Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Total Glossectomy Defect Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Oral Oncology

  • 1646 Accesses

Abstract

Advanced tumours of oral tongue or base of the tongue have poor oncological outcome and are functionally debilitating. The procedure of total glossectomy for surgical management of such locally advanced disease of the tongue was described in 1950s by Kremer [1]. However, total glossectomy procedure with laryngeal preservation was associated with significant morbidity due to aspiration; therefore, this procedure often has been mentioned as a “morbid procedure for a morbid disease”. Due to poor functional outcomes, it was relegated as a palliative procedure, and validity of such a procedure without laryngectomy was questioned [2, 3]. Due to the procedure-related morbidity, there was a trend towards organ preservation, and a variety of modalities such as chemoradiation and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation are now recommended for management of advanced carcinomas of oral and base of the tongue. However, many patients undergoing organ preservation treatment require surgical salvage for a residual or locally recurrent disease. Also, reports suggest unacceptable compromise with oncological outcome following organ preservation protocols. Recent development in microvascular reconstructive techniques has enabled better functional outcomes in patients undergoing total glossectomy [2, 4]. Therefore, in order to improve the oncological outcome without debilitating morbidity, there is renewed interest in considering total glossectomy as primary modality for management of advanced tongue tumours. The main factors that underlined this transition were better understanding of the dynamics associated with tongue reconstruction and availability of reconstructive options (Fig. 7.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kremer AJ. A surgical technique for primary combined en bloc resection of tongue, floor of mouth and cervical lymphatics. Surgery. 1951;39:227–46.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kreeft A, Tan IB, Van den Brekel MW, Hilgers FJ, Balm AJ. The surgical dilemma of ‘functional inoperability’ in oral and oropharyngeal cancer: current consensus on operability with regard to functional results. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009;34:140–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sultan MR, Coleman JJ. Oncologic and functional considerations of total glossectomy. Am J Surg. 1989;158:297–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sinclair CF, Carroll WR, Desmond RA, Rosenthal EL. Functional and survival outcomes in patients undergoing total glossectomy compared with total laryngoglossectomy. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg. 2011;145:755–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Calabrese L, Giugliano G, Bruschini R, Ansarin M, Navach V, Grosso E, Gibelli B, Ostuni A, Chiesa F. Compartmental surgery in tongue tumors: description of a new surgical technique. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2009;29:259–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mc Connel FMS, Cerenko D, Mendlesohn MS. Manofluorographic analysis of swallowing. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1988;21:625–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ariyan S. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. A versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63:73–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haddock NT, Delacure MD, Saadeh PB. Functional reconstruction of glossectomy defects: the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous neotongue. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2008;24:343–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vega C, Leon X, Cervelli D, et al. Total or subtotal glossectomy with microsurgical reconstruction: functional and oncological results. Microsurgery. 2011;31:517–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lyos AT, Evans GR, Perez D, Schusterman MA. Tongue reconstruction: outcomes with the rectus abdominis flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:442–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu P, Robb GL. Reconstruction for total and near total glossectomy defects. Clin Plast Surg. 2005;32:411–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haughey BH. Tongue reconstruction: concepts and practice. Laryngoscope. 1993;103:1132–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tiwari R, Karim ABMF, Greven AJ, Snow GB. Total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117:512–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kimata Y, Sakuraba M, Hishinuma S, et al. Analysis of the relations between the shape of the reconstructed tongue and postoperative functions after subtotal or total glossectomy. Laryngoscope. 2003;113:905–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yun IS, Lee DW, Lee WJ, et al. Correlation of neotongue volume changes with functional outcomes after long term follow up of total glossectomy. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:111–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Urken ML, Moscoso JF, Lawson W, Biller HF. A systematic approach to functional reconstruction of the oral cavity following partial and total glossectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:589–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Calcaterra T. Laryngeal suspension after supraglottic laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol. 1971;94:306–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goode RL. Laryngeal suspension in head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope. 1976;86:349–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weber RS, Ohlms L, Bowman J, et al. Functional results after total or near total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117:512–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Krespi YP, Sisson GA. Reconstruction after total or subtotal glossectomy. Am J Surg. 1983;146:488–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang EI, Yu P, Skoracki RJ, Liu J, Hanasono MM. Comprehensive analysis of functional outcomes and survival after microvascular reconstruction of glossectomy defects. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3061–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shedd DP, Scatliff JA, Kirchner JA. A cineradiographic study of postresectional alterations in oropharyngeal physiology. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1960;110:69–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gehanno P, Guedon C, Barry B, et al. Advanced carcinoma of the tongue: total glossectomy without total laryngectomy. Review of 80 cases. Laryngoscope. 1992;102:1369–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rihani J, Lee MR, Lee T, Ducic Y. Flap selection and functional outcomes in total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149:547–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, et al. Postoperative complications and functional results after total glossectomy with microvascular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:1028–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Davison SP, Grant NN, Schwarz KA, et al. Maximising flap inset for tongue reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1982–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Biglioli F, Liviero F, Frigerio A, et al. Function of sensate free forearm flap after partial glossectomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006;34:332–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dziegielewski PT, Ho ML, Rieger J, Singh P, Langille M, Harris JR, Seikaly H. Total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation and free flap reconstruction: objective functional outcomes and systematic review of the literature. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:140–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ozkan O, Oozkan O, Derin AT, Bektas G, Cinpolat A, Duymaz A, Mardini S, Cigna E, Chen H–C. True functional reconstruction of total or subtotal glossectomy defects using a chimeric anterolateral thigh flap with both sensorial and motor innervation. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74:557–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Baas M, Duraku LS, Corten EM, Mureau MA. A systematic review on the sensory functional benefits. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68:1025–35. Epub ahead of print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Navach V, Zurlo V, Calabrese L, Massaro MA, Bruschini R, Giugliano G, Ansarin M, Chiesa F. Total glossectomy with preservation of the larynx: oncological and functional results. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51:217–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Center, Narayana Health, Bangalore, India

    Vijay Pillai

  2. Cytecare Cancer Hospitals, Bangalore, India

    Vikram D. Kekatpure

Authors
  1. Vijay Pillai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vikram D. Kekatpure
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikram D. Kekatpure .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Head and Neck Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, USA

    Moni Abraham Kuriakose

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pillai, V., Kekatpure, V.D. (2017). Total Glossectomy Defect Reconstruction. In: Kuriakose, M.A. (eds) Contemporary Oral Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43854-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43854-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43852-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43854-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation