• Jen JungEun Oh
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)


Unlike other countries at a similar income level, Russia’s urbanization rate plateaued more than two decades ago (Fig. 10.1). However, this does not imply a lack of dynamic. On the contrary, Russian cities have been undergoing critical economic, social, and demographic changes, which have produced new urban mobility needs and challenges. Since the breakup of the Soviet Union, the country has gone through a dramatic economic and political transition. Today, Russia’s socioeconomic model is characterized by a mixture of the new market economy and the institutional legacy of the Soviet era, including a large footprint of the state and a generous social contract. These idiosyncrasies of Russia’s model are also mirrored in the ways in which urban land is developed, infrastructure is built, and public services are provided.


Public Transport Urban Transport Public Transport System Private Operator Public Transport Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This chapter benefited immensely from the insight, data and information provided by the Russian Federal Ministry of Transport, the Scientific and Research Institute of Motor Transport (NIIAT), the Directorate of the Moscow Transport Hub, and representatives from Russian municipalities: Aktyubinsk, Astrakhan, Balashikha, Cheboksary, Kemerovo, Krasnodar, Lipetsk, Moscow, Nizhniy Novgorod, Novosibirsk, Omsk, Rostov-on-Don, St. Petersburg, Stavropol, Stavropol, Tambov, Tomsk, Tyumen, Ulan-Ude, Ussuriysk, Velikiy Novgorod, Vladivostok, Volgograd, Volzhskiy, Yekaterinburg, and Znamensk. The author is grateful for valuable background material and support from current and formal World Bank colleagues, including Kenneth Gwilliam, Maria Shmis, Aleksandra Durova, and Evgenia Epaneshnikova. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author and should not be attributed in any manner to any organizations or individuals listed above. Any mistakes found in the report are the sole responsibility of the author.


  1. Buckley RM, Mini F (2000) From commissars to mayors: cities in the transition economies. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coulibaly S, Deichmann U, Dillinger WR, Heroiu MI, Kessides IN, Kunaka C, Saslavsky D (2012) Eurasian cities: new realities along the silk road. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gayah VV, Daganzo CF (2012) Analytical capacity comparison of one-way and two-way signalized street networks. Transp Res Rec 2301:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Golubchikov O (2004) Urban planning in Russia: towards the market. Eur Plan Stud 12(2):229–247. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000183950 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hovavko IY (2014) Economic analysis of traffic congestion in Moscow (Экoнoмичecкий aнaлиз мocкoвcкиx пpoбoк), Public Administration, the Newsletter (Гocудapcтвeннoe упpaвлeниe. Элeктpoнный вecтник). 43.
  6. ITF (2016) Moscow wins international transport award for tackling traffic gridlock. ITF Media Release, 19 May 2016. Paris: ITF.
  7. Oh J, Gwilliam K (2013) Review of the urban transport sector in the Russian Federation: transition to long-term sustainability, Transport Paper 41. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Oh J, Gwilliam K, Podolske R, Agarwal OM (2012) A national framework for sustainable urban transport systems: proposals for improving urban transportation in Russian cities. World Bank, Washington DC, Google Scholar
  9. Oxfam (2014) Inequality trends and policy responses in contemporary Russia, Oxfam Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
  10. Russian Federation (2002) Federal Law on State and Municipal Unitary Enterprises, No.161-FZ.Google Scholar
  11. Russian Federation (2007) Federal Law on Automobile Roads and Road Activity, No. 257-FZ.Google Scholar
  12. Russian Federation (2011), Federal Law on Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation, No. 69-FZ.Google Scholar
  13. Selin M (2012) Problems in the investment in tramway infrastructure: a case study in Ufa, Russia. Paper presented at the European transport conference, Frankfurt, Germany, 29 Sep–1 Oct 2014.Google Scholar
  14. St. Petersburg Government (2012) Parking study and survey in St. Petersburg, prepared by JSC “SPC” TRANSIS.Google Scholar
  15. St. Petersburg Government (2014) Categories of citizens entitled to preferential travel in the passenger public transport in St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
  16. World Bank (2010) Russia Economic Report, No. 22, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. World Bank (2013) Poverty social impact analysis for the national urban transport improvement project, Russian Federation, prepared by Ecorys.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The World BankWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations