Abstract
The Major Evolutionary Transitions theory of Szathmáry and Maynard Smith is famous for its contribution to the understanding of complex wholes in biology. Typical for Major Evolutionary Transitions theory is the select use of functional criteria, notably, cooperation, competition reduction and reproduction as part of a larger unit. When using such functional criteria, any group of attached cells can be viewed as multicellular, such as a plant or the slug-shaped aggregation of cells of a slime mould. In addition, one could also have used structural criteria to arrive at the conclusion that the cells in the slug of a slime mould are attached without plasma strands, while the cells of a plant are attached and connected through plasma strands. A theory which in addition to functional criteria also uses structural criteria for the identification of major transitions is the Operator Theory. Using the Operator Theory one can, for example, conclude that the slug of a slime mould represents a pluricellular organisation because its cells are not connected through plasma strands, while the cells of a plant are connected through plasma strands and for this reason represent a multicellular organism. In this chapter, the relationships between the Major Evolutionary Transitions theory and the Operator Theory are studied with a focus on transitions that lead to organisms.
‘In attempting to distinguish organisms from parts and from groups, authors often list qualities that typify organisms, but usually also recognize the many exceptions to these general patterns. Many such qualities fail as definitional criteria on the grounds that they are necessary for recognizing an organism, but not sufficient because they also are met by many non-organisms’ (Pepper and Herron 2008 ).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alvarez de Lorenzana JM (1993) The constructive universe and the evolutionary systems framework. In: Salthe SN (ed) Development and evolution. Complexity and change in biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 291–308, Appendix
Bardele CF (1997) On the symbiotic origin of protists, their diversity, and their pivotal role in teaching systematic biology. Ital J Zool 64:107–113
Bonner JT (1974) On development: the biology of form. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Booth A (2014) Symbiosis, selection, and individuality. Biol Philos. doi:10.1007/s10539-014-9449-8
Bouchard F, Huneman P (eds) (2013) From groups to individuals. Evolution and emerging individuality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Bourke AFG (2011) Principles of social evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Buss LW (1987) The evolution of individuality. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Calcott B, Sterelny K (eds) (2011) The major transitions in evolution revisited. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Cartwright P (2013) Developmental insights into the origin of complex colonial hydrozoans. Integr Comp Biol 43:82–86
Chan CX, Bhattacharya D (2010) The origin of plastids. Nature Educ 3:84
Corning PA (1983) The synergism hypothesis. McGraw-Hill, New York
Corning PA, Szathmáry E (2015) ‘Synergistic selection’: a Darwinian frame for the evolution of complexity. J Theor Biol 371:45–58
Gagat P, Bodył A, Mackiewicz P, Stiller JW (2014) Tertiary plastid endosymbioses in dinoflagellates. In: Löffelhardt W (ed) Endosymbiosis. Springer, Wien, pp 233–290
Giddings TH, Staehelin LA (1978) Plasma membrane architecture of Anabaena cylindrica: occurrence of microplasmodesmata and changes associated with heterocyst development and the cell cycle. Cytobiology 16:235–249
Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Godfrey-Smith P (2013) Darwinian individuals. In: Bouchard F, Huneman P (eds) From groups to individuals. Evolution and emerging individuality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Heylighen F (1990) Relational closure: a mathematical concept for distinction-making and complexity analysis. In: Trappl R (ed) Cybernetics and systems ’90. World Science, Singapore, pp 335–342
Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2008) Analysing hierarchy in the organisation of biological and physical systems. Biol Rev 83:1–12
Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2010a) The Operator Hierarchy, a chain of closures linking matter life and artificial intelligence, Alterra Scientific contributions 34. Alterra, Wageningen
Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2010b) Towards a hierarchical definition of life, the organism, and death. Found Sci 15:245–262
Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2012a) The pursuit of complexity. The utility of biodiversity from an evolutionary perspective. KNNV Publisher, Zeist, The Netherlands
Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2012b) The role of logic and insight in the search for a definition of life. J Biomol Struct Dyn 29:619–620
Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2014) General laws and centripetal science. Eur Rev 22:113–144
Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM, van Straalen NM (1999) Operators, the Lego–bricks of nature: evolutionary transitions from fermions to neural networks. World Futures 53:329–345
Keeling PJ (2010) The endosymbiotic origin, diversification and fate of plastids. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:729–748
Koestler A (1978) Janus: a summing up. Hutchinson & Co. Ltd, London
Maynard Smith J (1988) Evolutionary progress and the levels of selection. In: Nitecki MH (ed) Evolutionary progress. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 219–230
Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. W.H. Freeman Spektrum, Oxford
McShea DW, Simpson CG (2011) The miscellaneous transitions in evolution. In: Sterelny K (ed) The major transitions in evolution revisited. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Miller JG (1978) Living systems. McGraw-Hill, New York
Pepper JW, Herron MD (2008) Does biology need an organism concept? Biol Rev 83:621–627
Queller DC, Strassmann JE (2009) Beyond society: the evolution of organismality. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:3143–3155
Salthe S (1985) Evolving hierarchical systems: their structure and representation. Columbia University Press, New York
Santelices B (1999) How many kinds of individual are there? Tree 14:152–155
Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Soc Philos Sci 106:467–482
Stebbins G (1969) The basis of progressive evolution. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
Szathmáry E (2015) Toward major evolutionary transitions theory 2.0. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:10104–10111
Szathmáry E, Maynard Smith J (1995) The major evolutionary transitions. Nature 374:227–232
Turchin VE (1977) The phenomenon of science, a cybernetic approach to human evolution. Colombia University Press, New York
Von Bertalanffy L (1950) An outline of general system theory. Br J Philos Sci 1:134–165
West SA, Fisher RM, Gardner A, Kiers ET (2015) Major evolutionary transitions in individuality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. doi:10.1073/pnas.1421402112
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jagers op Akkerhuis, G.A.J.M. (2016). The Role of Structural Criteria in Transitions Theory: A Focus on Organisms. In: Jagers op Akkerhuis, G. (eds) Evolution and Transitions in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43802-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43802-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43801-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43802-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)