Skip to main content

Learning from Water: Two Complementary Definitions of the Concept of Life

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolution and Transitions in Complexity

Abstract

The concept of life is central to biology and related life sciences, but there is no convergence on a definition. With the aim to resolve this problem analogies were studied between definitions of water and life. The concept of water refers to two phenomena: material particles (the H2O molecules) and interacting water molecules (liquid water). Likewise, the concept of life can be viewed as referring to a property of special material particles (the organisms) and to the system of interacting organisms (the ecosystem). In a comparable way as chemical theory has solved the problem of defining the water molecule, one can apply the Operator Theory for solving the problem of defining the organism concept. The analogy with water subsequently offers inspiration for two ontologically distinct definitions of life: (1) a definition of life as a general indication for a property that all organisms have, and (2) a definition of life that refers to a system of interacting organisms. These two definitions refer to different ontological kinds and accordingly cannot be merged into a single definition. For this reason the concept of life can be viewed as involving two, complementary, definitions. It is discussed how findings based on the water-life analogy contribute to current discussions about the definition of life.

“There is such a deep entanglement between these two levels that both the collective and the individual organization of life are cause and consequence of each other. Nevertheless, it is important to underline that there is also a basic asymmetry between the individual (metabolic) network and the collective (ecological) one: both are self-maintaining and self-producing organizations, but only individual beings (organisms) are autonomous agents with a self-produced, active physical border, plus a high degree of functional integration among components, plus a machinery for hereditary reproduction”(Ruiz-Mirazo et al. 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Becquerel P (1950) La suspension de la vie des spores des bactéries et des moisissures desséchées dans le vide, vers le zéro absolu. Ses conséquences pour la dissémination et la conservation de la vie dans l’univers. Les Comptes rendus de l”Académie des sciences, Paris, 231: p 1274, pp 1392–1394

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau MA (2007) What is life. In: Sarkar S, Plutynski A (eds) A companion to the philosophy of biology. Blackwell Publishing, New York. pp 455–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau MA (1998) Four puzzles about life, vol 4, Artificial life. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau MA, Cleland CE (2010) The nature of life. In: Bedau MA, Clevand CE (eds) Classical and contemporary perspectives from philosophy and science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benner SA, Ricardo A, Carrigan MA (2004) Is there a common chemical model for life in the universe? Current opinion in chemical biology 8:672–689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boden MA (2000) Autopoiesis and life. Cognit Sci Quarterly 1:117–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Broca MP (1860–1861) Rapport sur la question soumise à la Société de Biologie au sujet de la reviviscence des animaux desséchés. Mém Soc Biol, 3me Série, II, 1860: 1–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler JLR, van de Vijver G (Eds) (2000) Closure: emergent organizations and their dynamics. Ann N Y Acad Sci 901

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland CE (2012) Life without definitions. Synthese 185:125–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland CE, Chyba CF (2002) Defining “life”. Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere 32:387–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland CE, Chyba CF (2007) Does “life” have a definition? In: Sullivan III, Woodruff T, Baross JA (eds) Planets and life: the emerging science of astrobiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Deamer DW, Fleischaker GR (eds) (1994) Origins of life: the central concepts. Jones & Bartlett, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche C (1997) Autopoietic systems, replicators, and the search for a meaningful biological definition of life. Ultimate Reality and Meaning 20:244–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox Keller E (2002) Making sense of life: explaining biological development with models, metaphors and machines. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gánti T (1971) The principle of life (in Hungarian). Gondolat, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengeveld R (2010) Definitions of life are not only unnecessary, but they can do harm to understanding. Foundations of Science 16:323–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heylighen F (1990) Relational closure: a mathematical concept for distinction-making and complexity analysis. In: Trappl R (ed) Cybernetics and systems “90. World Science, Singapore, pp 335–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2001) Extrapolating a hierarchy of building block systems towards future neural network organisms. Acta Biotheoretica 49: 171–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2008) Analyzing hierarchy in the organization of biological and physical systems. Biol Rev 83: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2009) The Operator Hierarchy: Evolution Beyond Genes. Abstract of a poster presentation at ECAL 2009, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2010a) Towards a hierarchical definition of life, the organism, and death. Foundations of Science 15: 245–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2010b) Explaining the origin of life is not enough for a definition of life. Foundations of Science 16: 327–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2010c) The Operator Hierarchy. A chain of closures linking matter, life and artificial intelligence. Ph.D. thesis Radboud University Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2012a) Contributions of the operator hierarchy to the field of biologically driven mathematics and computation. In: Integral biomathics: tracing the road to reality

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2012b) The pursuit of complexity. The utility of biodiversity from an evolutionary perspective. KNNV. pp 120

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2012c) The role of logic and insight in the search for a definition of life. J Biomol Struct Dyn 29(4):619–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2014) General laws and centripetal science. Eur Rev 22:113–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM, van Straalen NM (1999) Operators, the Lego–bricks of nature: evolutionary transitions from fermions to neural networks. World futures. J Gen Evol 53: 329–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilin D (1959) The Leeuwenhoek lecture: the problem of anabiosis or latent life: history and current concept. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 150:149–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshland DE Jr (2002) The seven pillars of life. Science 295:2215–2216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luigi Luisi P, Ferri F, Stano P (2006) Approaches to semi-synthetic minimal cells: a review. Naturwissenschaften 93:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machery E (2012) Why I stopped worrying about the definition of life… why you should as well. Synthese 185:145–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition. The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, (also in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 42)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales J (1998) The definition of life. Psychozoan 1 (a strictly electronic journal): 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris V, Raine DJ (1998) A fission-fusion origin for life. Orig Life Evol Biosph 28:523–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver JD, Perry RS (2006) Definitely life but not definitely. Origin Life Evol Biosphere 36:515–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popa R (2003) Between necessity and probability. Searching for the definition and the origin of life, Advances in astrobiology and biogeophysics. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray TS (1991) Evolution and optimization of digital organisms. In: Billingsley KR, Derohanes E, Brown H, III (eds) Scientific excellence in supercomputing: The IBM 1990 Contest prize papers, Athens, GA, 30602: The Baldwin Press, The University of Georgia. pp 489–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Mirazo K, Pereto J, Moreno A (2004) A universal definition of life: autonomy and open-ended evolution. Origin Life Evol Biosphere 34:323–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell MJ, Barge LM, Bhartia R, Bocanegra D, Branscomb E, Bracher PJ, Kidd R, McGlynn S, Meier DH, Nitschke W, Shibuya T, Vance S, White L, Kanik I (2014) The drive to life on wet and icy worlds. Astrobiol 14:308–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sagan C (1970) Life. Encyclopedia Brittannica. pp 1083–1083A. Chicago: Encyclopedia Brittannica Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SP (1977) Introduction. In: Schwartz SP (ed) Naming, necessity, and natural kinds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims K (1994) Evolving 3D morphology and behavior by competition. In: Brooks RA, Maes P (eds) Artificial life IV: proceedings. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 28–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K, Griffith P (1999) Sex and death: an introduction to philosophy of biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoelhorst JW (2008) The explanatory logic and ontological commitments of generalized Darwinism. J Econ Methodol 15:343–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trifonov EN (2011) Vocabulary of definitions of life suggests a definition. J Biomol Struct Dyn 29:259–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Steen WJ (1997) Limitations of general concepts: a comment on Emmeche’s definition of “life”. Ultimate Real Mean 20:317–320

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerard A. J. M. Jagers op Akkerhuis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jagers op Akkerhuis, G.A.J.M. (2016). Learning from Water: Two Complementary Definitions of the Concept of Life. In: Jagers op Akkerhuis, G. (eds) Evolution and Transitions in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43802-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics