Skip to main content

Quantitative Analysis of 3D T1‐Weighted Gadolinium (Gd) DCE‐MRI with Different Repetition Times

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2308 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9805))

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) acquires T1-weighted MRI scans before and after injection of an MRI contrast agent such as gadolinium (Gd). Gadolinium causes the relaxation time to decrease, resulting in higher MR image intensities after injection followed by a gradual decrease in image intensities during wash out. Gd does not pass the intact blood–brain barrier (BBB), thus its dynamics can be used to quantify pathology associated with BBB leaks. In current clinical practice, it is suggested to use the same pulse sequence for pre-injection T1 calibration and Gd concentration calculation in the DCE image sequence based on the spoiled gradient recalled echo (SPGR) signal equation. A common method for T1 estimation is using variable flip angle (VFA). However, when the parameters such as the repetition time (TR) for image acquisition could be tuned differently for T1 estimation and DCE acquisition, the popular dcemriS4 software package that handles only a fixed TR often results in discrepancies in Gd concentration estimation. This paper reports a quick solution for calculating Gd concentrations when different TRs are used. First, the pre-injection T1 map is calculated by using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm with VFA acquisition, then, because the TR used for DCE acquisition is different from the VFA TR, the equilibrium magnetization is updated with the TR for DCE, and the Gd concentration is calculated thereafter. In the experiments, we first simulated Gd concentration curves for different tissue types and generated the corresponding VFA and DCE image sequences and then used the proposed method to reconstruct the concentration. Comparing with the original simulated data allows us to validate the accuracy of the proposed computation. Further, we tested performance of the method by simulating different amounts of Ktrans changes in a manually selected region of interest (ROI). The results showed that the new method can estimate Gd dynamics more accurately in the case where different TRs are used and be sensitive enough to detect slight Ktrans changes in DCE-MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tofts, P.: Quantitative MRI of the Brain: Measuring Changes Caused by Disease. Wiley, Hoboken (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. O’Connor, J.P., Jackson, A., Parker, G.J., Jayson, G.C.: DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents. Br. J. Cancer 96, 189–195 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sourbron, S., Ingrisch, M., Siefert, A., Reiser, M., Herrmann, K.: Quantification of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and blood–brain-barrier leakage with DCE-MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 62, 205–217 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tofts, P.S.: T1-weighted DCE imaging concepts: modelling, acquisition and analysis. Signal 500, 400 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liberman, G., Louzoun, Y., Ben Bashat, D.: T-1 mapping using variable flip angle SPGR data with flip angle correction. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 40, 171–180 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Whitcher, B., Schmid, V.J.: dcemriS4: a package for medical image analysis. R package version 0.40 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Statistical Parametric Mapping. http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/

  8. Parker, G.J.: Measuring contrast agent concentration in T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. In: Jackson, A., Buckley, D.L., Parker, G.J.M. (eds.) Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Oncology, pp. 69–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kanal, E., Maravilla, K., Rowley, H.: Gadolinium contrast agents for CNS imaging: current concepts and clinical evidence. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 35, 2215–2226 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fritz-Hansen, T., Rostrup, E., Larsson, H.B., Søndergaard, L., Ring, P., Henriksen, O.: Measurement of the arterial concentration of Gd-DTPA using MRI: a step toward quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 36, 225–231 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cuenod, C.A., Balvay, D.: Perfusion and vascular permeability: basic concepts and measurement in DCE-CT and DCE-MRI. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 94, 1187–1204 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pascual, B., Rockers, E., Bajaj, S., Anderson, J., Xue, Z., Karmonik, C., Masdeu, J.: Regional kinetics of [18F]AV-1451 uptake and Gadolinium concentration in young and older subjects. In: Abstract in 10th Human Amyloid Imaging, Miami, FL, p. 170, 13–15 January 2016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong Xue .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rockers, E.D., Pascual, M.B., Bajaj, S., Masdeu, J.C., Xue, Z. (2016). Quantitative Analysis of 3D T1‐Weighted Gadolinium (Gd) DCE‐MRI with Different Repetition Times. In: Zheng, G., Liao, H., Jannin, P., Cattin, P., Lee, SL. (eds) Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality. MIAR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9805. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43775-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43775-0_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43774-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43775-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics