Skip to main content

Mechanical and Surgical Options for Patients with End-Stage Heart Failure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Guide to Heart Transplantation
  • 1596 Accesses

Abstract

While heart failure medications, and in certain cases, cardiac resynchronization therapy or implantable cardiac defibrillators have improved quality of life and survival in heart failure patients, overall morbidity and mortality is still high [1]; refractory end-stage heart failure patients ultimately require either short or long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) or heart transplantation. While transplantation is the current gold standard and only definitive solution, the lack of available donor hearts and prevalence of significant comorbidities as contraindication to transplantation has led to growing use of MCS devices. Indeed, in patients with end stage heart failure considered too unstable to await a suitable donor organ, biventricular or left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as well as total artificial hearts (TAHs) can be employed as bridge-to-transplantation therapy and have been shown to improve quality of life, survival-to-transplantation rates, and post-transplant survival [2, 3].

ACC/AHA guidelines state that general indications for referral for MCS include stage D patients who demonstrate LVEF <25% and NYHA class III-IV functional status in spite of guideline-directed medical therapy, with either high predicted 1–2 year mortality (based on reduced peak oxygen consumption or clinical prognostic scores) or continuous dependence on parenteral inotropic support [2]. Generally, patient selection should be a multidisciplinary decision involving advanced heart failure/transplantation cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, nurses, social workers, and palliative care clinicians.

Mechanical circulatory support consists primarily of ventricular assist devices (VADs) and the newer Total Artificial Heart (TAH), of which the latter will be discussed in detail in Chap. 17. Overall, the optimal strategy should include implanting the ideal MCS device with the best durability and lowest incidence of adverse events and that provides satisfactory cardiac output for either one or both failing ventricles. This chapter aims to provide an overview of mechanical circulatory support devices and indications for their usage in end-stage heart failure patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lund LH, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, et al. The registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: thirty-second official adult heart transplantation report--2015; focus theme: early graft failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(10):1244–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;128(16):e240–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Copeland JG, Smith RG, Arabia FA, et al. Cardiac replacement with a total artificial heart as a bridge to transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(9):859–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1435–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstein DJ, Oz MC, Rose EA. Implantable left ventricular assist devices. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(21):1522–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Christiansen S, Klocke A, Autschbach R. Past, present, and future of long-term mechanical cardiac support in adults. J Card Surg. 2008;23(6):664–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Toeg HD, Al-Atassi T, Garcia JP, Ruel M. An update on mechanical circulatory support for heart failure therapy. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2014;29(2):167–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lok SI, Martina JR, Hesselink T, et al. Single-centre experience of 85 patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: clinical practice and outcome after extended support. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44:e233–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park SJ, Milano CA, Tatooles AJ, et al. Outcomes in advanced heart failure patients with left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5:241–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL, et al. Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6000 mechanical circulatory support patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:141–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Slaughter MS, Pagani FD, McGee EC, et al. HeartWare ventricular assist system for bridge to transplant: combined results of the bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(7):675–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. ClinicalTrials.gov. Accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01166347 on 4 June, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  13. Esmore D, Kaye D, Spratt P, et al. A prospective, multicenter trial of the VentrAssist left ventricular assist device for bridge to transplant: safety and efficacy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;27(6):579–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morshuis M, El-Banayosy A, Arusoglu L, et al. European experience of DuraHeart magnetically levitated centrifugal left ventricular assist system. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35:1020–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, et al. Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(12):1495–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mancini DM, Beniaminovitz A, Levin H, et al. Low incidence of myocardial recovery after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 1998;98(22):2383–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Feldman D, Pamboukian SV, Teuteberg JJ, et al. The 2013 international society for heart and lung transplantation guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(2):157–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stevenson LW, Pagani FD, Young JB, Jessup M, Miller L, Kormos RL, et al. INTERMACS profiles of advanced heart failure: the current picture. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;28:535–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gordon RJ, Weinberg AD, Pagani FD, et al. Prospective, multicenter study of ventricular assist device infections. Circulation. 2013;127:691–702.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hasin T, Marmor Y, Kremers W, et al. Readmissions after implantation of axial flow left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:153–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wever-Pinzon O, Drakos SG, Kfoury AG, et al. Morbidity and mortality in heart transplant candidates supported with mechanical circulatory support: is reappraisal of the current United network for organ sharing thoracic organ allocation policy justified? Circulation. 2013;127(4):452–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Quader MA, Wolfe LG, Kasirajan V. Heart transplantation outcomes in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device-related complications. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(1):75–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Deng MC, Weyand M, Hammel D, et al. Selection and management of ventricular assist device patients: the Muenster experience. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2000;19(8 Suppl):S77–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Paden ML, Conrad SA, Rycus PT, et al. Extracorporeal life support organization registry report 2012. ASAIO J. 2013;59:202–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Prodhan P, Bhutta AT, Gossett JM, et al. Comparative effects of ventricular assist device and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on renal function in pediatric heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1428–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lemaire A, Anderson MB, Prendergast T, et al. Outcome of the impella device for acute mechanical circulatory support. Innovations (Phila). 2013;8:12–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pozzi M, Quessard A, Nguyen A, et al. Using the Impella 5.0 with a right axillary artery approach as bridge to long-term mechanical circulatory assistance. Int J Artif Organs. 2013;36:605–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sassard T, Scalabre A, Bonnefoy E, et al. The right axillary artery approach for the impella recover LP 5.0 microaxial pump. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1468–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kar B, Adkins LE, Civitello AB, et al. Clinical experience with the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device. Tex Heart Inst J. 2006;33(2):111–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, et al. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(23):2241–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Abrams D, Combes A, Brodie D. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiopulmonary disease in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt A):2769–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime Moriguchi MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moriguchi, J. (2017). Mechanical and Surgical Options for Patients with End-Stage Heart Failure. In: Kobashigawa, J. (eds) Clinical Guide to Heart Transplantation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43773-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43773-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43771-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43773-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics