Documentation Status and Child Development in the U.S. and Europe

Chapter

Abstract

Unauthorized status pertains to immigrants in countries around the world who do not have full inclusion and status as citizens. This chapter focuses on two examples—the Roma in Europe and the undocumented in the U.S.—that reflect groups at risk due to formal social exclusion. The United States and the European Union each face their own policy debates regarding unauthorized immigrants and its effects on child development. In each case, we briefly summarize the history of those with the status, including trends over recent years; evidence on whether lacking citizenship as represented in documentation affects child development; the mechanisms through which the status may affect access to contexts associated with positive child development; and then programs and policies that may affect the status itself, or access to developmental contexts linked to the status. Finally, we synthesize the emerging commonalities and distinct patterns across the U.S. and Europe from the relevant evidence, and future directions for theory and research.

Keywords

Undocumented Roma United States European Union 

References

  1. A death in Patchoque. (2008). New York Times, A28.Google Scholar
  2. Abrego, L. (2014). Sacrificing families: Navigating laws, labor, and love across borders. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Abel, G. J., & Sander, N. (2014). Quantifying global international migration flows. Science, 343(6178), 1520–1522.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Act, J. R. (1924). ch. 190. Stat, 153.Google Scholar
  5. Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2009). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ataman, A., Çok, F., & Şener, T. (2012). Understanding civic engagement among young Roma and young Turkish people in Turkey. Human Affairs, 22(3), 419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bardach, E. (2012). A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  8. Baucal, A. (2006). Development of mathematical and language literacy among Roma students. Psihologija, 39(2), 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bean, F. D., Leach, M. A., Brown, S. K., Bachmeier, J. D., & Hipp, J. R. (2011). The educational legacy of unauthorized migration: Comparisons across US-immigrant groups in how parents’ status affects their offspring. International Migration Review, 45, 348–385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett, J. (2012). The Roma early childhood inclusion overview report. Budapest: UNICEF, Open Society Foundations and Roma Education Fund.Google Scholar
  11. Bernhardt, A., Milkman, R., Theodore, N., Heckathorn, D., Auer, M., DeFilippis, J., et al. (2009). Broken laws, unprotected workers. National employment law project. New York: NELP.Google Scholar
  12. Biro, M., Smederevac, S., & Tovilovic, S. (2009). Socioeconomic and cultural factors of low scholastic achievement of Roma children. Psihologija, 42(3), 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brabeck, K., & Xu, Q. (2010). The impact of detention and deportation on Latino immigrant children and families: A quantitative exploration. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 32(3), 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burde, D., Kapit, A., Wahl, R., Guven, O., & Skarpeteig, M. (2014). Education in emergencies: A review of theory and research (manuscript under review). New York: New York University.Google Scholar
  15. Congress, U. S. (1882). Chinese Exclusion Act. In 47th congress, session I.Google Scholar
  16. Congress, U. S. (1965). Hart-celler act (Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965).Google Scholar
  17. Crosnoe, R., & Fuligni, A. J. (2012). Children from immigrant families: Introduction to the Special Section. Child Development, 83(5), 1471–1476.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. De Piccoli, N., Colombo, M., & Mosso, C. (2002). Active participation as an expression of the sense of community. Paper presented at the IV European Congress of Community Psychology, Barcelona, Spain, 8–11 November.Google Scholar
  19. Dimitrova, R., Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & van de Vijver, F. (2013). Collective identity and wellbeing of Roma minority adolescents in Bulgaria. International Journal of Psychology, 48(4), 502–513.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Erikson, E. H. (1959). Psychological issues: identity and the life cycle. In Erikson E. H. (Ed.), Growth and crises of the healthy personality (Vol. 1, pp. 50–100). New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  21. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis (No. 7). WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  22. Evans, G. (2004). The environment of childhood poverty. American Psychologist, 59(2), 22–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. European Commission. (2010). Roma in Europe: The implementation of European Union Instruments and Policies for Roma Inclusions—Progress Report 2008–2010. European Union.Google Scholar
  24. European Commission. (2014). Report of the implementation of the EU framework for National Roma Integration Strategies. European Union.Google Scholar
  25. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2014). Poverty and employment: The situation of Roma in 11 EU Member States. Google Scholar
  26. Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, adopted 10 Nov. 1994, opened for signature 1 Feb. 1995, entered into force 1 Feb. 1998, 2151 UNTS 243, ETS 157, reprinted in 34 ILM 351 (1995). http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/157/htm.39statesparties.
  27. Gonzales, R. G. (2011). Learning to be illegal: Undocumented youth and shifting legal contexts in the transition to adulthood. American Sociological Review, 76(4), 602–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gonzales, R. G., Terriquez, V., & Ruszczyk, S. P. (2014). Becoming DACAmented assessing the short-term benefits of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). American Behavioral Scientist, 58(14), 1852–1872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gormley, W. T., Jr., Gayer, T., Phillips, D., & Dawson, B. (2005). The effects of universal pre-K on cognitive development. Developmental Psychology, 41, 872–884.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Havighurst, R. J. (1952). Developmental tasks and education. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
  31. Hoefer, M., Rytina, N., & Baker, B. C. (2012). Estimates of the unauthorized immigrant population residing in the United States: January 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  32. Kitsantonis, N., & Bilefsky, D. (2013). Greek abduction case highlights Roma tensions. The New York Times. Retrieved November 11, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/22/world/europe/roma-couple-ordered-jailed-by-greek-authorities.html
  33. Lazarová, B., & Pol, M. (2002). Multikulturalita a rovné příležitosti v české škole [Multiculturality and equal opportunities in Czech school]. Praha: Institut pedagogicko-psychologického poradenství ČR.Google Scholar
  34. Lenoir, R. (1974). Les Exclus: Un Français sur dix [The excluded: One in ten French]. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  35. Lipott, S. (2012). Roma as a protected minority-policies and best practices in the EU. The Romanian Journal European Affairs, 12, 78.Google Scholar
  36. Lopez, M. H., & Marcelo, K. B. (2008). The civic engagement of immigrant youth: New evidence from the 2006 Civic and Political Health of the Nation Survey. Applied Developmental Science, 12(2), 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). Research on resilience: Response to commentaries. Child Development, 71(3), 573–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund. (2014). Detention, deportation, and devastation: The disproportionate effect of deportations on the Latino Community. MALDEF.Google Scholar
  40. Migration Policy Institute. (2004). The Roma of Eastern Europe: Still searching for inclusion. Migration Information Source. Google Scholar
  41. Molnár, E., & Dupcsik, C. (2008). Country report on education: Hungary. EDUMIGROM Background Papers.Google Scholar
  42. National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia. (2009). Law on the fundamentals of the educational system. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia.Google Scholar
  43. National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia. (2010). Law on preschool education. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia.Google Scholar
  44. New York Office of Immigrant Affairs. (2014). Deferred action. Retrieved November 16, 2014, from http://www.nyc.gov/html/imm/html/initiatives/defaction.shtml
  45. Ngai, M. M. (2004). Impossible subjects: Illegal aliens and the making of modern America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Nunev, J. (2000). Current problems of ethno-cultural identification of Roma in Bulgaria. In V. Rusanov (Ed.), Aspects of ethnocultural situation in Bulgaria (pp. 273–281). Sofia: Open Society Foundation.Google Scholar
  47. Ortega, A. N., Horwitz, S. M., Fang, H., Kuo, A. A., Wallace, S. P., & Inkelas, M. (2009). Documentation status and parental concerns about development in young US children of Mexican origin. Academic pediatrics, 9, 278–282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Passel, J. S. (1986). Undocumented immigration. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 487, 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. (2008). Trends in unauthorized immigration. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  50. Passel, J., Cohn, D., Krogstad, J. M., & Gonzalez-Barrera, A. (2014). As growth stalls, unauthorized immigrant population becomes more settled. Washington, DC: Pew Research Institute.Google Scholar
  51. Potochnick, S. R., & Perreira, K. M. (2010). Depression and anxiety among first-generation immigrant Latino youth: key correlates and implications for future research. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198, 470–477.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Roma Early Childhood Inclusion. (2012). Roma early childhood inclusion: The RECI Overview Report.Google Scholar
  53. Šerek, J., Petrovičová, Z., & Macek, P. (2011). The civic life of young Czech Roma: Perceived resources, barriers, and opportunities. Diversity is Reality: Effective Leadership of Diverse Teams in a Global Environment, 143–152.Google Scholar
  54. Suárez-Orozco, C., Yoshikawa, H., Teranishi, R. T., & Suárez-Orozco, M. M. (2011). Growing up in the shadows: The developmental implications of unauthorized status. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 438–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Suárez-Orozco, C., Yoshikawa, H., & Tseng, V. (2015). Intersecting inequalities: Future directions for research with immigrant-origin children and youth. Report, William T. Grant Foundation.Google Scholar
  56. Svensson, A. L., Marojevic, S., Kovats, M., Surdu, M., & Rakocevic, N. K. (2007). Breaking the cycle of exclusion: Roma children in South East Europe.Google Scholar
  57. Teranishi, R., Suarez-Orozco, C., & Suarez-Orozco, M. (2015). In the shadows of the ivory tower: Undocumented undergraduates in the uncertain era of immigration reform. Los Angeles: UCLA Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
  58. Thompson, I. (2013). Romani. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from http://aboutworldlanguages.com/romani
  59. Torpey, J. C. (Ed.). (2001). Documenting individual identity: The development of state practices in the modern world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  60. United Nations. (1999). Convention on the rights of the child. New York: Author.Google Scholar
  61. UNICEF. (2007). Breaking the cycle of exclusion–Roma children in South East Europe.Google Scholar
  62. UNICEF. (2011). The right of Roma children to education: Position paper.Google Scholar
  63. UNICEF. (2013). Every child’s birth right: Inequities and trends in birth registration. New York: Author.Google Scholar
  64. Weiland, C., & Yoshikawa, H. (2013). Impacts of a prekindergarten program on children’s mathematics, language, literacy, executive function, and emotional skills. Child Development, 84, 2112–2130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. World Bank. (2003). Bosnia Herzegovina Poverty Assessment (p. 21).Google Scholar
  66. Yoshikawa, H. (2011). Immigrants raising citizens: Undocumented parents and their young children. New York, NY: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  67. Yoshikawa, H., Godfrey, E. B., & Rivera, A. C. (2008). Access to institutional resources as a measure of social exclusion: Relations with family process and cognitive development in the context of immigration. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2008(121), 63–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Yoshikawa, H., & Kalil, A. (2011). The effects of parental undocumented status on the developmental contexts of young children in immigrant families. Child Development Perspectives, 5, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yoshikawa, H., Suarez-Orozco, C., & Gonzales, R. (in press). Society for Research in Adolescence consensus statement on unauthorized status and youth development. Journal of Research on Adolescence. Google Scholar
  70. Yoshikawa, H., Weiland, C., Ulvestad, K., Perreira, K., Crosnoe, R., Chaudry, A., et al. (2014). Improving access of low-income immigrant families to health and human services: The role of community-based organizations (Policy Brief No. 4, Immigrant Access to Health and Human Services Project). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  71. Yoshikawa, H., Weisner, T. S., & Lowe, E. D. (Eds.). (2006). Making it work: Low-wage employment, family life, and child development. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  72. Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Zoon, I. (2001). On the margins: Roma and public services in Romania, Bulgaria, and Macedonia; with a supplement on housing in the Czech Republic; a call to action to improve Romani access to social protection, health care, and housing. Open Society Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NYUNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations