Valuing Ecosystems as an Economic Part of Climate-Compatible Development Infrastructure in Coastal Zones of Kenya & Sri Lanka

Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 42)


Even though ‘green’ options for addressing the impacts of climate change have gained in currency over recent years, they are yet to be fully mainstreamed into development policy and practice. One important reason is the lack of economic evidence as to why investing in ecosystems offers a cost-effective, equitable and sustainable means of securing climate adaptation, disaster risk reduction and other development co-benefits. This chapter presents a conceptual framework for integrating ecosystem values into climate-compatible development planning. Case studies from coastal areas of Kenya and Sri Lanka illustrate how such an approach can be applied in practice to make the economic and business case for ecosystem-based measures. It is argued that, rather than posing ‘grey’ and ‘green’ options as being necessarily in opposition to each other or as mutually incompatible, from an economic perspective both should be seen as being part and parcel of the same basic infrastructure that is required to deliver essential development services in the face of climate change.


Climate-compatible development Coastal ecosystems Economic valuation Mangroves 



This chapter presents the findings of research conducted under the iCoast project ‘understanding the fiscal and regulatory mechanisms necessary to achieve CCD in the coastal zone’. The project was carried out by Edinburgh Napier University, LTS International, Birmingham University, Ruhuna University in Sri Lanka and Kenya Marine and Fisheries Institute, in collaboration with Ecometrica. It was funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) and the Netherlands Directorate-General for International Cooperation (DGIS) under the Climate & Development Knowledge Network (CDKN), for the benefit of developing countries. However, the views expressed and information contained in this chapter are not necessarily those of or endorsed by DFID, DGIS or the entities managing the delivery of the Climate and Development Knowledge Network, nor the project’s implementing institutions, which can accept no responsibility or liability for such views, completeness or accuracy of the information or for any reliance placed on them.


  1. Agardy T, Alder J, Dayton P et al (2005) Coastal systems. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash, N (eds) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends: findings of the condition and trends working group, Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailly D, Willmann R (2001) Promoting sustainable aquaculture through economic and other incentives. In: Subasinghe R, Phillips M, Bueno P et al (eds) Aquaculture in the third millennium. Technical proceedings of the conference on aquaculture in the third millennium, Bangkok, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbier E, Hacker S, Kennedy C et al (2011) The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81(2):169–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batagoda, B (2003) The economic valuation of alternative uses of mangrove forests in Sri Lanka, UNEP/Global programme of action for the protection of the Marine Environment from Land-based Activities, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  5. Beaudoin Y, Pendleton L (2012) Why value the oceans? A discussion paper. TEEB Office, United Nations Environment Programme, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck M, Shepard C (2012) Coastal habitats and risk reduction. In: World risk report. Published in collaboration with the UN University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS) and The Nature Conservancy (TNC), Alliance Development Works (Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft), BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Bournazel J, Kumara M, Jayatissa L et al (2015) The impacts of shrimp farming on land-use and carbon storage around Puttalam Lagoon, Sri Lanka. Ocean Coast Manag 113:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cannon J (1999) Participatory workshop for the economic valuation of natural resources in the Togean Islands, Central Sulawesi. NRM/EPIQ, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  9. Chadburn O, Anderson C, Cabot Venton C, Selby S (2013) Applying cost benefit analysis at a community level: a review of its use for community based climate and disaster risk management. Oxfam Research Reports June 2013, Oxfam International and Tearfund, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark S, Grossman T, Przyuski N et al (2012) Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change: a cost-benefit analysis. Report prepared for Conservation International by Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California at Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  11. Colls A, Ash N, Ikkala N (2009) Ecosystem-based adaptation: a natural response to climate change. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), GlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper E, Burke L, Bood N (2008) Coastal capital: economic contribution of coral reefs and mangroves to Belize. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahdouh-Guebas F, Zetterstrom T, Ronnback P et al (2002) Recent changes in land-use in the Pambala-Chilaw Lagoon complex (Sri Lanka) investigated using remote sensing and GIS: conservation of mangroves vs. development of shrimp farming. Environ Dev Sustain 4:185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Das S (2009) Can mangroves minimize property loss during big storms? An analysis of house damage due to the super cyclone in Orissa. South Asia Network for Development and Environmental Economics (SANDEE), KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  15. Das S, Crépin A (2013) Mangroves can provide protection against wind damage during storms. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 134:98–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Mel M, Weerathunge C (2011) Valuation of ecosystem services of Maha Oya. Environmental Foundation, ColomboGoogle Scholar
  17. Emerton L (2006) Counting coastal ecosystems as an economic part of development infrastructure. Ecosystems and Livelihoods Group Asia, International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), ColomboGoogle Scholar
  18. Emerton L (2009) Investing in natural infrastructure: the economic value of Indonesia’s marine protected areas and coastal ecosystems. Coral Triangle Initiative, The Nature Conservancy. (TNC), DenpasarGoogle Scholar
  19. Emerton L (2014a) Using valuation to make the case for economic incentives: promoting investments in marine and coastal ecosystems as development infrastructure. In: Essam M (ed) Economic incentives for marine and coastal conservation: prospects, challenges and policy implications. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Emerton L (2014b) Valuing and investing in ecosystems as development infrastructure: economic analysis of options for climate-compatible development in coastal zones of Kenya & Sri Lanka. Technical report to iCoast project, LTS International, PenicuikGoogle Scholar
  21. Emerton L (2014c) Assessing, demonstrating and capturing the economic value of marine & coastal ecosystem services in the Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem. BOBLME-2014-Socioec-02, Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem project, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), PhuketGoogle Scholar
  22. Emerton L, Kekulandala B (2003) The economic value of Muthurajawela wetland, Sri Lanka. International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Regional Environmental Economics Programme and Sri Lanka Country Programme, ColomboGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferrario F, Beck M, Storlazzi C et al (2014) The effectiveness of coral reefs for coastal hazard risk reduction and adaptation. Nat Commun. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4794 Google Scholar
  24. Gunawardena M, Rowan J (2005) Economic valuation of a mangrove ecosystem threatened by shrimp aquaculture in Sri Lanka. Environ Manag 36(4):535–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haisfield K, Fox H, Yen S et al (2010) An ounce of prevention: cost-effectiveness of coral reef rehabilitation relative to enforcement. Conserv Lett 3(2010):243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huxham M (2013) Economic valuation of mangrove ecosystem services in Southern Kenya. Report prepared for iCoast Project, School of Life, Sport and Social Sciences, Napier University, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  27. Huxham M, Emerton L, Kairo J et al (2015) Envisioning a better future for Kenyan mangroves: comparing business as usual with climate compatible development. J Environ Manag 157:168–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IUCN (2012) An Environmental and Fisheries Profile of the Puttalam Lagoon System. Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme for South and Southeast Asia (GCP/RAS/237/SPA) Field Project Document 2011/LKA/CM/06. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Sri Lanka Country Office, ColomboGoogle Scholar
  29. King L, Nap G (2013) What the future holds: visioning as a tool to develop climate compatible development scenarios: tourism as a case study. iCoast Policy Brief, LTS International, PenicuikGoogle Scholar
  30. Kirui K, Kairo J, Bosire J et al (2013) Mapping of mangrove forest land cover change along the Kenya coastline using Landsat imagery. Ocean Coast Manag 83:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumara M (2014) Field notes on the returns to shrimp farming and other land uses in mangrove areas of Puttalam Lagoon. Report prepared for iCoast Project, Ocean University of Sri Lanka, TangalleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumara M, Jayatissa L (2013) Case study template for Puttalam Lagoon. Report prepared for iCoast Project, Ocean University of Sri Lanka, TangalleGoogle Scholar
  33. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  34. MMC (2005) Natural hazard mitigation saves: an independent study to assess the future savings from mitigation activities. Findings, conclusions, and recommendations, vol 1. Multihazard Mitigation Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Mohammed E (2012) Payments for coastal and marine ecosystem services: prospects and principles. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. MPP-EAS (1999) Total economic valuation: marine and coastal resources in the Straits of Malacca. MPP-EAS technical report no. 24/PEMSEA technical report no. 2, GEF/UNDP/IMO Regional Programme for the Prevention and Management of Marine Pollution in the East Asian Seas (MPP-EAS)/Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA), Quezon CityGoogle Scholar
  37. MRAG (2009) Fisheries and subsidies. Policy brief 9, Marine Resources Assessment Group Ltd. (MRAG) and UK Department for International Development (DFID) LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Munroe R, Doswald N, Roe D et al (2012) Does EbA work? A review of the evidence on the effectiveness of ecosystem-based approaches to adaptation. IIED, BirdLife International, Cambridge University and UNEP-WCMC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Naumann S, Anzaldua G, Berry P et al (2011) Assessment of the potential of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation and mitigation in Europe. Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment, Contract no. 070307/2010/580412/SER/B2, Ecologic Institute and Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University Centre for the EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  40. OECD (2008) Pro-poor growth and natural resources: the economics and politics. Development Cooperation Directorate, Development Assistance Committee, OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  41. Powell N, Osbeck M, Sinh Bach Tan, Vu Canh Toan (2010) World resources report case study: mangrove restoration and rehabilitation for climate change adaptation in Vietnam. World Resources Report, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  42. Primavera J (1997) Socio-economic impacts of shrimp culture. Aquac Res 28:815–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ProAct Network (2008) The role of environmental management and eco-engineering in disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation. ProAct Network, NyonGoogle Scholar
  44. Rao N, Carruthers T, Anderson P et al (2013) An economic analysis of ecosystem-based adaptation and engineering options for climate change adaptation in Lami Town, Republic of the Fiji Islands. Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP), ApiaGoogle Scholar
  45. Renaud F, Sudmeier-Rieux K, Estrella M (2013) The role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction. United Nations University Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  46. Rideout A, Joshi N, Viergever K et al (2013) Making predictions of mangrove deforestation: a comparison of two methods in Kenya. Glob Chang Biol 19:3493–501Google Scholar
  47. SCBD (2009) Biodiversity for development and poverty alleviation. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  48. Shepard C, Crain C, Beck M (2011) The protective role of coastal marshes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 6(11), e27374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shreve C, Kelman I (2014) Does mitigation save? Reviewing cost-benefit analyses of disaster risk reduction. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 10:213–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spalding M, Ruffo S, Lacambra C et al (2014) The role of ecosystems in coastal protection: adapting to climate change and coastal hazards. Ocean Coast Manag 90:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sudmeier-Rieux K (2013) Ecosystem approach to DRR: basic concepts and recommendations to governments, with a special focus on EuropeGoogle Scholar
  52. TEEB (2008) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: an interim report. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  53. TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature. A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), NairobiGoogle Scholar
  54. Temmerman S, Meire P, Bouma T et al (2013) Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature 504(7478):79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tompkins E, Mensah A, King L et al (2013) An investigation of the evidence of benefits from climate compatible development. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy working paper no. 124, London School of Economics and Sustainability Research Institute Paper No. 44, University of LeedsGoogle Scholar
  56. UN Global Compact, UNEP, Oxfam, WRI. (2011) Adapting for a green economy: companies, communities and climate change. A caring for climate report by the United Nations Global Compact, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Oxfam, and World Resources Institute (WRI), UN Global Compact Office, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. UNEP (2004) Analyzing the resource impact of fisheries subsidies: a matrix approach. Economics and Trade Branch, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  58. UNEP (2011) Making the case for ecosystem-based adaptation: building resilience to climate change. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), NairobiGoogle Scholar
  59. UNEP-WCMC (2006) In the front line: shoreline protection and other ecosystem services from mangroves and coral reefs. World Conservation Monitoring Centre, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  60. UNEP-WCMC (2011) Marine and coastal ecosystem services: valuation methods and their application. UNEP-WCMC Biodiversity series no. 33, UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  61. van Beukering P, Brander L, Tompkins E, McKenzie E (2007) Valuing the environment in small Islands: an environmental economics toolkit. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  62. Wattage P (2011) Valuation of ecosystem services in coastal ecosystems: Asian and European perspectives. Ecosystem Services Economics (ESE) working paper series no. 8, Division of Environmental Policy Implementation, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), NairobiGoogle Scholar
  63. Weragodatenna D (2010) An atlas of the Puttalam Lagoon area. IUCN – International Union for Conservation of Nature, ColomboGoogle Scholar
  64. Westers T (2012) Assessing sustainability of smallholder shrimp farms in Sri Lanka. Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Calgary, AlbertaGoogle Scholar
  65. World Bank and FAO (2009) The sunken billions – the economic justification for fisheries reform. The World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environment Management GroupColomboSri Lanka
  2. 2.School of Life, Sport and Social SciencesEdinburgh Napier UniversityEdinburghUK
  3. 3.Independent ConsultantEdinburghUK
  4. 4.Ocean University of Sri LankaTangalleSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations