Abstract
A perception analysis is an important approach for developing adequate sensitization activities and increasing the participation of local populations in ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR) and ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA). These concepts have great potential in the study area, the mountain region of Rio de Janeiro state, where a disaster in 2011 showed once more that landslides, mudslides and floods are recurrent. Although degradation of the natural ecosystems is one of the main reasons for the high vulnerability of the local population, ecosystem-based measures to reduce disaster risks and to adapt to climate change are still uncommon. Valuing the benefits of nature through community-based adaptation measures is one promising approach to reduce landscape and ecosystem degradation and vulnerability, but a high level of community awareness is needed to generate their active participation in protecting and restoring ecosystems. To analyze the degree of awareness and the reasons for the barriers to participation, a perception analysis was conducted based on collected quantitative and qualitative data. Results show that people (a) have a high perception of their vulnerability, but (b) have poor knowledge about the relation between risks and ecosystem services, (c) do not feel responsible for participating, and (d) do not see possibilities for a better engagement in disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. We conclude that these three gaps (b, c and d) need to be addressed as a main component of a sensitization concept for Eco-DRR and EbA in the region.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
All questions and results presented in this article are translations from Portuguese into English. For a list of all questions and results from the semi-structured questionnaire in Portuguese please see Lange et al. (2013).
- 2.
For the exact composition of each index please see Lange et al. (2013).
- 3.
The formula used to calculate the index of perception of vulnerability is: perception of vulnerability = perception of exposure + perception of sensitivity – perception of adaptive capacity (GIZ 2013). To generate a value between 0 and 1 for the vulnerability index, we used the formula “1 – ((Nmax -Nx)/(Nmax-Nmin))” (UNDP 1990).
- 4.
For more information on the composition of each index, including the sets of questions, please see Lange et al. (2013).
- 5.
For more information on the toolkit please see Lange et al. (2013).
References
Allen K (2006) Community-based disaster preparedness and climate adaptation: local capacity-building in the Philippines. Disasters 30(1):81–101
Borrini-Feyerabend G, Pimbert M, Farvar T et al (2007) Sharing power: a global guide to collaborative management of natural resources. Earthscan, London
Brasil (2012) Código Florestal: Lei n° 12.651 de 25 de maio de 2012. Presidência da República, Brasília. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12651.htm
Brodbeck N (ed) (2012) World risk report. Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft, Berlin
Care (2010) Community based adaptation toolkit. Digital toolkit. Care. http://www.careclimatechange.org/files/toolkit/CARE_Integration_Toolkit.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2014
CEPED-UFSC (2011) Atlas Brasileiro de Desastres Naturais: 1991–2010. Volume Rio de Janeiro. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis
Collins KMT, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Jiao QG (2007) A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. J Mixed Methods Res 1(3):267–294
Colls A, Ash N, Ikkala N (2009) Ecosystem-based Adaptation: a natural response to climate change. IUCN, Gland. 16 pp
DRM-RJ (2012) Diagnóstico sobre o risco a escorregamentos no estado do Rio de Janeiro e plano de contingencia para atuaçao do NADE/DRM-RJ no período de dezembro de 2011 a abril de 2012. Governo do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro
Fernandes NF, Guimaraes RF, Gomes RAT et al (2004) Topographic controls of landslides in Rio de Janeiro: field evidence and modeling. CATENA 55(2):163–181
Flick U (2007) Designing qualitative research. SAGE, London
Flick U (2011) Triangulation: Eine Einführung. Reihe Qualitative Sozialforschung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (2014) Atlas dos remanescentes florestais da Mata Atlântica, período 2012–2013. São Paulo. http://mapas.sosma.org.br/site_media/download/atlas_2012-2013_relatorio_tecnico_2014.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2014
Galindo Leal C, Gusmão-Câmara I (2003) The Atlantic Forest of South America: biodiversity status, threats, and outlook, vol 1, State of the Hotspots. Island Press, Washington, DC
Gibbs GR (2007) Analyzing qualitative data. In: Flick U (ed) The SAGE qualitative research kit. SAGE, Los Angeles
GIZ (2013) Assessing and monitoring climate vulnerability. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, Eschborn
Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 15:199–213
Guha-Sapir D, Vos F, Below R, Ponserre S (2012) Annual disaster statistical review 2011 – the numbers and trends. Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels
IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística) (2010) Censo Demográfico 2010. http://censo2010.ibge.gov.br. Accessed 10 Oct 2014
IIED (2009) Participatory learning and actions. Community-based adaptation to climate change. IIED, London
IPCC (2001) 3rd Assessment Report, Working Group II, Appendix I, www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/. Accessed 10 Oct 2014
Jha AK, Bloch R, Lamond J (2012) Cities and flooding: a guide to integrated urban flood risk management for the 21st century. The World Bank, Washington, DC. http://www.gfdrr.org/gfdrr/sites/gfdrr.org/files/urbanfloods/pdf/Cities%20and%20Flooding%20Guidebook.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2014
King L, Marfai M (2008) Coastal flood management in Semarang, Indonesia. Environ Geol 55(7):1507–1518
Lange W, Cavalcante L, Dünow L et al (2013) HumaNatureza2 = Proteção Mútua. Percepção de riscos e adaptação à mudança climática baseada nos ecossistemas na Mata Atlântica, Brasil. Schriftenreihe des Seminars für Ländliche Entwicklung 255 (SLE). Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Landwirtschaftlich-Gärtnerische Fakultät, Berlin. http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/series/sle/255/PDF/255.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2014
Madajewicz M, Pfaff A, van Geen A et al (2007) Can information alone change behavior? Response to arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh. J Dev Econ 84:731–754
Marengo JA (2008) Água e Mudanças Climáticas. Estudos Avançados 22(63):83–96
Mayring P (2000) Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qual Soc Res 1(2)
Mayring P (2010) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz, Weinheim
Messner F et al (2006) Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception – challenges for flood damage research. In: Schanze J, Zeman E, Marsalek J (eds) Flood risk management: hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures, vol 67, NATO Science Series. IV. Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 149–167
Mytanz C (2013) Indicators for local and regional vulnerability assessment in rural Cameroon. Climate Protection Programme for Developing Countries. Eschborn
Nehren U, Alfonso de Nehren S, Heinrich J (2009) Forest fragmentation in the Serra dos Órgãos: historical and landscape ecological implications. In: Gaese H et al (eds) Biodiversity and land use systems in the fragmented Mata Atlântica of Rio de Janeiro. Cuvillier, Göttingen, pp 39–64
Nehren U, Sudmeier-Rieux K, Sandholz S et al (eds) (2014) The ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction. Case study and exercise source book. UNEP and CNRD, Geneva
PBMC (2013a) Contribuição do Grupo de Trabalho 1 ao Primeiro Relatório de Avaliação Nacional do Painel Brasileiro de Mudanças Climáticas. Sumário Executivo GT1. PBMC, Rio de Janeiro
PBMC (2013b) Contribuição do Grupo de Trabalho 2 ao Primeiro Relatório de Avaliação Nacional do Painel Brasileiro de Mudanças Climáticas. Sumário Executivo do GT2. PBMC, Rio de Janeiro
Plapp S (2003) Wahrnehmung von Risiken aus Naturkatastrophen. Eine empirische Untersuchung in sechs gefährdeten Gebieten Süd- und Westdeutschlands. http://digbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/volltexte/3542003
Renaud FG, Sudmeier-Rieux K, Estrella M (2013) The relevance of ecosystems for disaster risk reduction. In: Renaud F, Sudmeier K, Estrella M (eds) The role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction. UNU Press, Tokyo, pp 3–25
Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC et al (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 142(6):1141–1153
SBF (2011) Áreas de Preservaçao Permanente e Unidades de Conservaçao x Áreas de Risco. O que uma coisa tem a ver com a outra?. Série Biodiversidade 41. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília
SEA (2012) Plano Estadual sobre Mudança do Clima. Governo do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro. http://download.rj.gov.br/documentos/10112/1312221/DLFE-56319.pdf/planoEstadualmudclima.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2014
Slovic P (1992) Perception of risk: reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In: Krimsky S et al (eds) Social theories of risk. Praeger, New York, pp 117–152
Slovic P, Weber EU (2002) Perception of risk posed by extreme events. Working paper. Columbia University, New York. http://www.rff.org/Documents/Events/Workshops%20and%20Conferences/Climate%20Change%20and%20Extreme%20Events/slovic%20extreme%20events%20final%20geneva.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2014
Smyth C, Royle S (2000) Urban landslide hazards: incidence and causative factors in Niterói, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Appl Geogr 20:95–117
Sudmeier-Rieux K, Ash N (2009) Environmental guidance note for disaster risk reduction: healthy ecosystems for human security, Revised Edition. IUCN, Gland
UNDP (1990) Human development report 1990. The concept of measurement of human development. United Nations Development Programme, New York/Oxford
UNEP (2015): Promoting ecosystems for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: opportunities for integration. Discussion paper. http://www.unep.org/disastersandconflicts/portals/155/publications/EcoDRR_Discussion_paper_web.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2015
Venton P (2008) Linking climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Tearfund, Teddington. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/3007_CCAandDRRweb.pdf Accessed 10 Oct 2014
Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C, Kuhlicke C (2013) The risk perception paradox – implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Anal 33(6):1049–1065
Weber EU (1997) Perception and expectation of climate change: precondition for economic and technological adaptation. In: Bazerman M, Messick D, Tenbrunsel A, Wade-Benzoni K (eds) Psychological perspectives to environmental and ethical issues in management. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 314–341
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lange, W., Pirzer, C., Dünow, L., Schelchen, A. (2016). Risk Perception for Participatory Ecosystem-Based Adaptation to Climate Change in the Mata Atlântica of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. In: Renaud, F., Sudmeier-Rieux, K., Estrella, M., Nehren, U. (eds) Ecosystem-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Adaptation in Practice. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43633-3_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43633-3_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43631-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43633-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)