Advertisement

Assessing the Application Potential of Selected Ecosystem-Based, Low-Regret Coastal Protection Measures

  • C. Gabriel David
  • Nannina Schulz
  • Torsten Schlurmann
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 42)

Abstract

Climate change and subsequent processes triggered by climate change demand novel assessments and protection schemes in coastal environments, as frequency and intensity of extreme events as well as mean sea water levels are expected to rise. Most often, conventional coastal engineering approaches are solely built for protection purposes, but often come with negative side-effects to the coastal environment and communities. During the last decade, new concepts in coastal engineering have started emerging. Several technical measures with an ecosystem-based design have been developed and, in some places, already implemented over the last decade. These low-regret measures, for instance green belts, coir fibers and porous submerged structures, reveal their full potential as stand-alone coastal protection or when used in combination with each other. They are believed – and in some cases documented – to be a better alternative or potential complement to conventional “hard” coastal engineering protection. Concrete examples are taken from the densely populated coastal area of Jakarta Utara (North Jakarta) and the National Capital Integrated Coastal Development (NCICD), showing benefits and further opportunities, but also challenges for applied low-regret coastal protection measures and ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction. An assessment of the application potential of three “soft” protection measures is given and discussed.

Keywords

Soft coastal protection measures Ecosystem-based and Low Regret Adaptation Management (ELRAM) 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors appreaciate the support of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), who funded this work within the TWIN-SEA project.

References

  1. Akhwady R (2012) Kinerja terumbu buatan silinder berongga (bottle reeftm) sebagai pemecah gelombang ambang terbenam. Ph.D. dissertation, Insititute of Tenth November Surabaya Indonesia (in Indonesian language)Google Scholar
  2. Andayani A, Soejarwo PA, Indriasari VY (2013) Uji Coba Pemasangan Karung Geotekstil Memanjang (KGM) di Pantai Kamal Muara. (Trial test of longitudinal geotextile tube installation in Kmal Muara coastal area). Unpublished report. Pusat Pengkajian dan Perekayasaan Teknologi Kelautan dan Perikanan – BADAN LITBANGKP-KKP (in Indonesian language)Google Scholar
  3. Arnouil DS (2008) Shoreline response for a Reef Ball™ submerged breakwater system offshore of Grand Cayman Island. Master thesis, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  4. Augustin LN, Irish JL, Lynett P (2009) Laboratory and numerical studies of wave damping by emergent and near-emergent wetland vegetation. Coast Eng 56:332–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baine MSP (2001) Artificial Reefs: a review of their design, application, management and per-formance. Ocean Coast Manag 44(3–4):241–259. doi: 10.1016/S0964-5691(01)00048-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balan K, Venkatappa Rao G (1996) Erosion control with natural geotextiles. In: Rao GV, Banergee K (eds) Environmental geotechnology with geosynthetics. The Asian Society for Environmental Geotechnology and CBIP, New Delhi, pp 317–325Google Scholar
  7. Bao TQ (2011) Effect of mangrove forest structures on wave attenuation in coastal Vietnam. Oceanologia 53(3):807–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbier EB, Georgiou IY, Enchelmeyer B, Reed DJ (2013) The value of wetlands in protecting southeast Louisiana from hurricane storm surges. PLoS One 8(3), e58715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Black K, Mead S (2009) Design of surfing reefs. Reef J 1(1):177–191Google Scholar
  10. Bleck M, Omeraci H (2004) Analytical model for wave transmission at artificial reefs. In: Proceedings 29th international conference on Coastal Engineering (ICCE), ASCE, Vol 1, Lisbon, pp 269–281Google Scholar
  11. Bloomberg MR, Burden AM (2013) Coastal climate resilience – urban waterfront adaptive strategies. Department of City Planning, The City of New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Bou-Zeid E, El-Fadel M (2002) Climate change and water resources in Lebanon and the Middle East. J Water Resour Plan Manag 128(5):343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burcharth HF, Hawkins SJ, Zanuttigh B, Lamberti A (2007) Environmental design guidelines for low crested coastal structures. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Cánovas V, Medina R (2012) A long-term equilibrium beach planform model for coastal work design. Coast Eng Proc 1(33) doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.9753/icce.v33.sediment.43
  15. Carlisle JR, Turner CH, Ebert EE (1964) Artificial habitat in the marine environment. California Department of Fish and Game Fish Bulletin 124, 93 pGoogle Scholar
  16. Carus M, Gahle C, Pendarovski C et al (2008) Studie zur Markt- und Konkurrenzsituation bei Naturfasern und Naturfaser-Werkstoffen (Deutschland und EU). Gülzower Fachgespräche 26, Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V. (Hrsg.), Gülzow 2008, S. 126Google Scholar
  17. Cave ID, Walker JFC (1994) Stiffness of wood in Farown plantation softwood: the influence of microfibril angle. For Prod J 44(5):43–48Google Scholar
  18. Cesar H (1996) Economic analysis of Indonesian coral reefs. World Bank Environment Department Paper Department, Environmentally Sustainable Development Vice Presidency. The World Bank, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Chasten MA, Rosati JD, McCormick JW, Randall RE (1993) Engineering design guidance for detached breakwaters as shoreline stabilization structures, Technical report CERC-93-19. US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, VicksburgGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheong SM, Silliman B, Wong PP et al (2013) Coastal adaptation with ecological engineering. Nat Clim Chang 3(9):787–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 26:152–158. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dattatri J, Raman H, Shankar N (1978) Performance characteristics of submerged breakwaters. Coast Eng Proc 1(16). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.9753/icce.v16.%p
  24. De Vriend HJ, van Koningsveld M (2012) Building with nature: thinking, acting and interacting differently. EcoShape, Building with Nature, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  25. Dean RG, Chen R, Browder AE (1997) Full scale monitoring study of a submerged breakwater, Palm Beach, Florida, USA. Coast Eng 29(3–4):291–315. ISSN 0378–3839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. EAK 2002 (2007) Empfehlungen für die Ausführung von Küstenschutzbauwerken – Korrigierte Ausgabe 2007. Recommendations for coastal protection works – Ammended Edition 2007 Herausgeber (ed) Kuratorium für Forschung im Küsteningenieurwesen. Die Küste, Heft 65Google Scholar
  27. EJF (2006) Mangroves: nature’s defence against Tsunamis – a report on the impact of mangrove loss and shrimp farm development on coastal defences. Environmental Justice Foundation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M (2012) Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci 37(11):1552–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gedan KB, Kirwan ML, Wolanski E et al (2011) The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: Answering re-cent challenges to the paradigm. Clim Chang 106:7–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. GIZ (2011) Mangroves. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbHGoogle Scholar
  31. Gonzalez M, Medina R (2001) On the application of static equilibrium bay formulations to natural and man-made beaches. J Coast Eng 43:209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goreau TJ, Trench RK (2012) Innovative methods of marine ecosystem restoration. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guannel G, Ruggiero P, Faries J et al (2015) Integrated modeling framework to quantify the coastal protection services supplied by vegetation. J Geophys Res Oceans 120:324–345. doi: 10.1002/2014JC009821 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Habel R (2001) Künstliche Riffe zur Wellendämpfung. Berlin (Deutschland, Bundesrepublik). Dissertation, Mensch und Buch Verlag, Berlin 2001, 128 S.; TU BerlinGoogle Scholar
  35. Hadi S, Latief H, Muliddin M (2013) Analysis of surface wave attenuation in mangrove forest. Proc ITB Eng Sci 35:89–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harada K, Imamura F, Hiraishi T (2002) Experimental study on the effect in reducing tsunami by the coastal permeable structures. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Kita-Kyushu, Japan, May 26–31Google Scholar
  37. Harris LH (2002) Submerged reef structures for habitat enhancement and shoreline erosion abatement. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal & Hydraulic Engineering Technical Note (CHETN), VicksburgGoogle Scholar
  38. Harris LE, Turk G, Mead S (2004) Combined recreational amenities and coastal erosion protection using submerged breakwaters for shoreline stabilization. Beach Preservation Technology 2004, FSBPAGoogle Scholar
  39. Hashim AM, Catherine SMP, Takaijudin H (2013) Effectiveness of mangrove forests in surface wave attenuation: a review. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 5(18):4483–4488Google Scholar
  40. Hiraishi T, Harada K (2003) Greenbelt tsunami prevention in south-pacific region. Rep Port Airport Res Inst 42:1–23Google Scholar
  41. Hsu JRC, Evans C (1989) Parabolic bay shapes and applications. Proc Inst Civ Eng (Part 2) 87:557–570. Thomas Telford, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. IFRC (2014) Viet Nam: country case study report – how law and regulation support disaster risk reduction. From: IFRC-UNDP Series on Legal Frameworks to support Disaster Risk Reduction, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  43. IPCC (2012) In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner G-K, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York, 582 ppGoogle Scholar
  44. Irzal F (2013) Grey solutions for urban water management: Jakarta case. Presented on “C40 workshop on climate adaptation and risk assessment” Rotterdam, the Netherlands June 3–6, 2013. http://www.deltacities.com/documents/presentations/04%20Jakarta_CDC%20website.pdf
  45. Kathiresan K, Rajendran N (2005) Coastal mangrove forests mitigated tsunami. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 65:601–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Komar PD (1976) Beach processes and sedimentation. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  47. Lacambra C, Friess DA, Spencer T, Möller I (2013) Bioshields: mangrove ecosystems as resilient natural coastal defenses. In: Fabrice R, Rieux KS, Marisol E (eds) The role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 82–108Google Scholar
  48. Lekha KR (2004) Field instrumentation and monitoring of soil erosion in coir geotextile stabilized slopes: a case study. Geotext Geomembr 22:399–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lekha KR, Kavitha V (2006) Coir geotextile reinforced clay dykes for drainage of low-lying areas. Geotext Geomembr 24(1):38–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lowe RJ, Falter JL, Bandet MD et al (2005) Spectral wave dissipation over a barrier reef. J Geophys Res 110:C04001. doi: 10.1029/2004JC002711 Google Scholar
  51. Marques AR, de Oliveira Patrício PS, dos Santos FS et al (2014) Effects of the climatic conditions of the southeastern Brazil on degradation the fibers of coir-geotextile: evaluation of mechanical and structural properties. Geotext Geomembr 42(1):76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Martin D, Bertasi F, Colangelo MA (2005) Ecological impact of coastal defence structures on sediment and mobile fauna: evaluating and forecasting consequences of unavoidable modifications of native habitats. Coast Eng 52(10–11):1027–1051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mason MA, Keulegan CH (1944) A wave method for determining depths over bottom discontinuities, U.S. Army Beach Erosion Board. Tech. Memo. 5. Beach Erosion Board, Washington, DC, 29 ppGoogle Scholar
  54. Massel SR, Gourlay MR (2000) On the modelling of wave breaking and set-up on coral reefs. Coast Eng 39:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mazda Y, Magi M, Kogo M, Hong PN (1997a) Mangrove as a coastal protection from waves in the Tong King delta, Vietnam. Mangrove Salt Marshes 1:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mazda Y, Wolanski E, King B et al (1997b) Drag force due to vegetation in mangrove swamps. Mangrove Salt Marshes 1:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mazda Y, Magi M, Ikeda Y et al (2006) Wave reduction in a mangrove forest dominated by Sonneratia sp. Wetlands Ecol Manag 14:365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McIvor AL, Möller I, Spencer T, Spalding M (2012) Reduction of wind and swell waves by mangroves. Natural coastal protection series: report 1. Cambridge coastal research unit working paper 40. Published by The Nature Conservancy and Wetlands International. 27 p. ISSN 2050–7941Google Scholar
  59. Mendez FM, Losada IJ (2004) An empirical model to estimate the propagation of random breaking and non-breaking waves over vegetation fields. Coast Eng 51:103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mendonca A, Fortes CJ, Capitao R et al (2012) Hydrodynamics around an artificial surfing reef at Leirosa, Portugal. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 138:226–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Miller DE, Hoitsma TR, White DJ (1998) Degradation rates of woven coir fabric under field conditions. In: Hayes DF (ed) Engineering approaches to ecosystem restoration. Proceedings of the 1998 wetlands engineering and river restoration conference, Denver, Colorado, March 22–27, 1998. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 266–271Google Scholar
  62. Narayan S, Suzuki T, Stive MJF, Verhagen HJ, Ursem WNJ, Ranasinghe R (2010) On the effectiveness of mangroves in attenuating cyclone-induced waves. In: Proceedings of the international conference on coastal engineering 32 (no page numbers). URL: http://journals.tdl.org/ICCE/article/view/1250
  63. NCICD (2014) Draft master plan. National Capital Integrated Coastal Development Project, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  64. Oumeraci H, Clauss GF, Habel R, Koether G (2001) Unterwasserfiltersysteme zur Wellendämpfung. Abschlussbericht zum BMBF-Vorhaben “Unterwasserfiltersysteme zur Wellendämpfung” (in German)Google Scholar
  65. Pickering H, Whitmarsh D (1997) Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the ‘attraction versus production’ debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fish Res 31:39–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Quartel S, Kroon A, Augustinus PGEF et al (2007) Wave attenuation in coastal mangroves in the Red River delta. Vietnam J Asian Earth Sci 29(4):576–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rajagopal A, Ramakrishna S (2009) Coir Geotextiles as separation and filtration layer for low intensity road bases. Indian Geotechnical Conference (IGC-2009), Guntur, India. Vol II, pp 941–946Google Scholar
  68. Ranasinghe R, Turner IL (2006) Shoreline Response to submerged structures: a review. Coast Eng 53:65–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. RBF (The Reefball Foundation) (2014) Webpage: http://www.reefball.org/. Accessed 20 Nov 2014
  70. Roeber V, Cheung KF, Kobayashi MH (2010) Shock-capturing Boussinesq-type model for nearshore wave processes. Coast Eng 57(4):407–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rosenzweig C, Solecki WD, Blake R et al (2011) Developing coastal adaptation to climate change in the New York City infrastructure-shed: process, approach, tools, and strategies. Clim Chang 106:93–127. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-0002-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schlurmann T, Bleck M, Oumeraci H (2003) Wave transformation at artificial reefs described by the Hilbert-Huang Transformation. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Coastal Engineering (ICCE2002). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 2:1791–1803Google Scholar
  73. Schurholz H (1991) Use of woven coir geotextiles in Europe. Coir XXXV(2):18–25Google Scholar
  74. Scyphers SB, Powers SP, Heck KL Jr, Byron D (2011) Oyster reefs as natural breakwaters mitigate shoreline loss and facilitate fisheries. PLoS One 6(8), e22396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Silva GG, De Souza DA, Machado JC, Hourston DJ (1999) Mechanical and thermal characterization of native brazilian coir fiber. J Appl Polym Sci 76(7):1197–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Silvester R, Hsu JRC (1997) Coastal stabilization. World Scientific Publ. Co, Singapore, 578 pp. (Reprint of Silvester and Hsu, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Spalding M, McIvor A, Tonneijck FH et al (2014) Mangroves for coastal defence. Guidelines for coastal managers & policy makers. Wetlands International and The Nature Conservancy, Wageningen, 42 pGoogle Scholar
  78. Strusinska-Correia A, Husrin S, Oumeraci H (2013) Tsunami damping by mangrove forests: a laboratory study using parameterized trees. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:483–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Subaida EA, Chandrakaran S, Sankar N (2009) Laboratory performance of unpaved roads reinforced with woven coir geotextiles. Geotext Geomembr 27:204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Suzuki T, Zijlema M, Burger B et al (2012) Wave dissipation by vegetation with layer schematization in SWAN. Coast Eng 59(1):64–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2011.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tanaka N, Sasaki Y, Mowjood MIM et al (2007) Coastal vegetation structures and their functions in tsunami protection: experience of the re-cent Indian Ocean tsunami. Landsc Ecol Eng 3:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Taubenböck H, Goseberg N, Lämmel G et al (2013) Risk reduction at the “Last-Mile”: an attempt to turn science into action by the example of Padang. Nat Hazard 65:915–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Temmerman S, Meire P, Bouma TJ et al (2013) Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature 504(12):79–83. doi: 10.1038/nature12859 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Teo FY, Falconer RA, Lin B (2009) Modelling effects of mangroves on tsunamis. Water Manag 162:3–12Google Scholar
  85. Thornton EB, Guza RT (1983) Transformation of wave height distribution. J Geophys Res 88:5925–5938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tuyen NB, Hung HV (2009) An experimental study on wave reduction efficiency of mangrove forests. In: Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Asian Pacific Coasts (APAC2009). Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Oct 13–16, Singapore, 4:336–343Google Scholar
  87. UNEP (2010) Linking ecosystems to risk and vulnerability reduction. The case of Jamaica. UNEP, Geneva. See also: http://postconflict.unep.ch/publications/RiVAMP.pdf Google Scholar
  88. USACE-U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2002) Coastal engineering manual. Engineer manual 1110-2-1100. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC. (in 6 volumes)Google Scholar
  89. USACE-U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2005) National Erosion Control Development and Demonstration Program (Section 227) Miami Beach, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  90. Vedharajan B, Gross O (2007) MANGREEN – Mangrove ecology and restoration in India. Report 2006/07 (DEEPWAVE Report 09/07), 40 pGoogle Scholar
  91. Vo-Luong P, Massel SR (2006) Experiments on wave motion and suspended sediment concentration at Nang Hai, Can Gio mangrove forest, Southern Vietnam. Oceanologia 48(1):23–40Google Scholar
  92. Vo-Luong P, Massel S (2008) Energy dissipation in non-uniform mangrove forests of arbitrary depth. J Mar Syst 74(1–2):603–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wehkamp S, Fischer P (2013) Crustaceans and fish abundances and species at and around artificially introduced tetrapod fields in the southern North Sea, 2013. Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research – Biological Institute Helgoland. doi: 10.1594/PANGAEA.821916
  94. Whitmarsh D, Santos MN, Ramos J, Monteiro CC (2008) Marine habitat modification through artificial reefs off the Algarve (southern Portugal): an economic analysis of the fisheries and the prospects for management. Ocean Coast Manag 51:463–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wilby RL, Keenan R (2012) Adapting to flood risk under climate change. Prog Phys Geogr 36(3):348–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Yanagisawa H, Koshimura S, Goto K et al (2009) The reduction effects of mangrove forest on a tsunami based on field surveys at Pakarang Cape, Thailand and numerical analysis. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Young IR (1989) Wave transformation over coral reefs. J Geophys Res 94:9779–9789CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Gabriel David
    • 1
  • Nannina Schulz
    • 1
  • Torsten Schlurmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Franzius Institute for Hydraulics, Estuarine and Coastal EngineeringLeibniz University of HanoverHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations