Basili, V.R.: What’s so hard about replication of software engineering experiments? https://www.cs.umd.edu/~basili/presentations/RESER (2011). Accessed 18 Mar 2016
Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, R.C., Mellor, S., Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J., Thomas, D.: Manifesto for Agile Software Development (2001)
Google Scholar
Bonr, J., Farley, D., Kuhn, R., Thompson, M.: The reactive manifesto. http://www.reactivemanifesto.org/ (2014). Accessed 29 Mar 2016
Dugard, P., File, P., Todman, J.: Single-case and Small-n Experimental Designs: A Practical Guide to Randomization Tests, 2nd edn. Routledge (2012)
Google Scholar
Gast, D., Ledford, J.: Single Case Research Methodology: Applications in Special Education and Behavioral Sciences. Taylor & Francis (2014)
Google Scholar
Guevara, P.C.: Manifesto for minimalist software engineers. http://minifesto.org/ (2013). Accessed 29 Mar 2016
Harman, M., Jia, Y., Langdon, W.B.: A Manifesto for higher order mutation testing. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Software Testing, Verification, and Validation Workshops. ICSTW’10, pp. 80–89. IEEE (2010)
Google Scholar
Juristo, N., Moreno, A.M.: Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation, 1st edn. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated (2010)
Google Scholar
Kawalerowicz, M., CODEFUSION: microsoft visual studio extension NActivitySensor. https://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/4675d6fb-2608-48ed-ae0a-320b3a756047 (2013–2016). Accessed 18 Mar 2016
Kazdin, A.E.: Single-case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. Oxford University Press (2011)
Google Scholar
Kitchenham, B.A., Madeyski, L., Budgen, D., Keung, J., Brereton, P., Charters, S., Gibbs, S., Pohthong, A.: Robust Statistical Methods for Empirical Software Engineering. Empirical Software Engineering (in press) (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9437-5. doi:10.1007/s10664-016-9437-5
Kohavi, R., Longbotham, R., Sommerfield, D., Henne, R.M.: Controlled experiments on the web: survey and practical guide. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 18(1), 140–181 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10618-008-0114-1
Madeyski, L.: On the effects of pair programming on thoroughness and fault-finding effectiveness of unit tests. In: Münch, J., Abrahamsson, P. (eds.) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4589, pp. 207–221. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73460-4_20. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73460-4_20
Madeyski, L.: Impact of pair programming on thoroughness and fault detection effectiveness of unit test suites. Softw. Process: Improve. Pract. 13(3), 281–295 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/spip.382. doi:10.1002/spip.382
Madeyski, L.: Test-Driven Development: An Empirical Evaluation of Agile Practice. Springer, Heidelberg, London, New York (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04288-1. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04288-1
Madeyski, L., Jureczko, M.: Which process metrics can significantly improve defect prediction models? An empirical study. Softw. Qual. J. 23(3), 393–422 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11219-014-9241-7. doi:10.1007/s11219-014-9241-7
Madeyski, L., Kawalerowicz, M.: Continuous test-driven developmenta novel agile software development practice and supporting tool. In: Maciaszek, L., Filipe, J. (eds.) ENASE 2013—Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, pp. 260–267 (2013). http://madeyski.e-informatyka.pl/download/Madeyski13ENASE.pdf. doi:10.5220/0004587202600267
Madeyski, L., Piechowiak, A.: Exclipse plug-in activity sensor. http://sens.e-informatyka.pl/projekty/activity-sensor/ (2006). Accessed 18 Mar 2016
Madeyski, L., Szała, Ł.: Impact of aspect-oriented programming on software development efficiency and design quality: an empirical study. IET Softw. 1(5), 180–187 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen:20060071. doi:10.1049/iet-sen:20060071
Madeyski, L., Szała, Ł.: The impact of test-driven development on software development productivity—an empirical study. In: Abrahamsson, P., Baddoo, N., Margaria, T., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Software Process Improvement, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4764, pp. 200–211. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75381-0_18. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75381-0_18
Thomke, S.: Enlightened experimentation—the new imperative for innovation. Harv. Bus. Rev. 79(2), 66–75 (2001)
Google Scholar
Tichy, W.F.: Should computer scientists experiment more? Computer 31(5), 32–40 (1998)
MathSciNet
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Vokáč, M., Tichy, W., Sjøberg, D.I.K., Arisholm, E., Aldrin, M.: A controlled experiment comparing the maintainability of programs designed with and without design patterns–a replication in a real programming environment. Empir. Softw. Eng. 9(3), 149–195 (2004)
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Zendler, A., Horn, E., Schwärtzel, H., Plödereder, E.: Demonstrating the usage of single-case designs in experimental software engineering. Inf. Softw. Technol. 43(12), 681–691 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-5849(01)00177-X. doi:10.1016/S0950-5849(01)00177-X