Skip to main content

Influencing Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Clinical Practice at the Edge of Care

Abstract

This chapter considers the role that the theory and practice of systemic consultation can play in understanding and influencing edge-of-care contexts. Issues relating to power, patterned responses and the need for reflective and reflexive practice are discussed. Examples are given of how indirect systemic work can support greater effectiveness and positive outcomes when risk and decision-making issues arise in children’s social care settings and similar contexts. Ways of putting theory into practice are described, including methods of consultation with teams, managers and front-line practitioners. A case study also illustrates how direct and indirect clinical work can be combined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aggett, P. (2015). A six step invariant consultation model: Helping family workers have new ideas for going forward. Context: Working with Complexities, 139, 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, M. D. T. (1987). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26, 415–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In S. McNamee & K. Gergen (Eds.), Therapy as social construction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G., Jackson, D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. (1956). Towards a theory of schizophrenia. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 1(4), 251–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. London: Fontana/Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G., Jackson, D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. (1972). Toward a theory of Schizophrenia. In G. Bateson (Ed.), Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst, K., White, S., Fish, S., Munro, E., Fletcher, K., & Lincoln, H. (2010). Ten pitfalls and how to avoid them: What research tells us. NSPCC. Retrieved from https://www.nspcc.org.uk/services-and-resources/research-and-resources/

  • Burnham, J. (2005). Relational reflexivity; A tool for socially constructing therapeutic relationships. In C. Flaskas, B. Mason, & A. Perlesz (Eds.), The space between: Experience, context, and process in the therapeutic relationship. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D., & Huffington, C. (2008). Six stages of systemic consultation. In D. Campbell & C. Huffington (Eds.), Organisations connected: A handbook of systemic consultation. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchin, G. (1987). Hypothesising, circularity and neutrality revisited: An invitation to curiosity. Family Process, 26(4), 405–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchin, G., Lane, G., & Ray, W. (1994). Cybernetics of prejudices in the practice of psychotherapy. London: Karnac Books..

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallos, R., & Draper, R. (2010). An introduction to family therapy: Systemic theory and practice. Maidenhead: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, G. (2005). “Thinking in and out of the frame”: Applying systemic ideas to social work with children. In M. Bower (Ed.), Psychoanalytical theory for social work practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, A., & Miller, G. (2014). Serious case review under working together 2013 in respect of Child D: Agreed at the serious case review panel May 2014. Retrieved from http://www.haringeylscb.org/sites/haringeylscb/files/child_d_overview_report_final_march_2015_0.pdf

  • Forrester, D., Westlake, D., McCann, M., Thurnham, A., Shefer, G., Glynn, G., et al. (2013). Reclaiming social work? An evaluation of systemic units as an approach to delivering children’s services. Final report of a comparative study of practice and the factors shaping it in three local authorities. Luton: University of Bedfordshire/Tilda Goldberg Centre for Social Work and Social Care.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruggeri, L. (1992). Therapeutic process as the social construction of change. In S. McNamee & K. Gergen (Eds.), Therapy as social construction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K., & McNamee, S. (1999). Relational responsibility. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S., & Trowler, I. (Eds.). (2011). Social work reclaimed: Innovative frameworks for child and family social work practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, V. (1994). Reflections on the practice of systemic management in the climate of the “contract” culture. Human Systems. The Journal of Systemic Consultation and Management, 5(1–2), 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. (1994). Family systems theory: Developments in the Milan-Systemic therapies. London: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, I. B. (Ed.). (2012). Culture and reflexivity in systemic psychotherapy: Mutual perspectives. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, W. P., Little, M., & Cronen, V. (1990). The systemic professional: Domain of action and the question of neutrality. Human Systems: The Journal of Systemic Consultation and Management, 1, 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lax, W. D. (1992). Post-modern thinking in clinical practice. In S. McNamee & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Therapy as social construction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, B. (1993). Towards positions of safe uncertainty. Human Systems: The Journal of Systemic Consultation and Management, 4, 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, B. (2005). Relational risk-taking and the therapeutic relationship. In C. Flaskas, B. Mason, & A. Perlesz (Eds.), The space between: Experience, context, and process in the therapeutic relationship. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. (1985). Oxford conversations. Conference jointly organised by the Kensington Consultation Centre, London, The Family Institute, Cardiff and the Charles Burns Clinic, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGoldrick, M. (1992). Ethnicity and the family life cycle. Family Business Review, 5(4), 437–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2008). Effective child protection (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2010a). Learning to reduce risk in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1135–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2010b). The Munro review of child protection. Part 1: A systems analysis. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2011). Edging away from care—How services successfully prevent young people entering care. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/how-services-prevent-young-people-entering-care-edging-away-from-care

  • Oliver, C. (2005). Reflexive inquiry: A framework for consultancy practice. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyett, S. (2007). New ways of working for applied psychologists in health and social care: Working psychologically in teams. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, B. (2009). Making social worlds. A communication perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendry, N. (2011). Systemic practice in a risk management context. In S. Goodman & I. Trowler (Eds.), Social work reclaimed: Innovative frameworks for child and family social work practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivett, M., & Street, E. (2009). Family therapy: 100 Key points and techniques. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvini, M. P., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing—circularity—neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19(1), 3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Nuffield Foundation. (2013). Making not breaking: Building relationships for our most vulnerable children. Findings and recommendations of the Care Inquiry. Retrieved from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Care%20Inquiry%20-%20Full%20Report%20April%202013.pdf

  • Tomm, K. (1985). Circular interviewing: A multi-faceted clinical tool. In D. Campbell & R. Draper (Eds.), Applications of systemic family therapy: The Milan approach. London: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomm, K. (1987). Interventive interviewing: Part II. Reflexive questioning as a means to enable self-healing. Family Process, 26(2), 167–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomm, K. (1988). Interventive interviewing: Part III. Intending to ask lineal, circular, strategic, or reflexive questions? Family Process, 27(1), 1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. (1984). The invented reality. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wren, B. and Daniels, G. (2005) Narrative therapies with children and their families: A practitioner's guide to concepts and approaches. In Vetere, A. and Dowling, E. (Eds.), Narrative therapies with children and their families. A practitioners guide to concepts and approaches. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greenwood, J. (2016). Influencing Systems. In: Smith, L. (eds) Clinical Practice at the Edge of Care. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43570-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics