Skip to main content

Authentic CSR and Leadership: Towards a Virtues-Based Model of Stakeholder Dialogue and Engagement. The Loccioni Group Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

The paper addresses the theme of authentic CSR based on a virtues and a charismatic approach. Several studies underline how entrepreneurial behaviors and values lie at the base of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)-oriented strategies and actions. The business ethics literature emphasises the values dimension of entrepreneurial and managerial activity and has introduced concepts such as management integrity, authenticity and virtues, which are becoming widespread in the corporate context.

Departing from these premises, the works focuses on entrepreneurial and managerial leadership and on its attributes and role in developing an authentic CSR oriented strategy. The work addresses the following questions: Can a business become a laboratory capable of orienting and educating stakeholders’ “minds and hearts”? How does leadership affect the dissemination of a CSR authentic orientation at all levels of the organization? On which values and virtues is an authentic leadership based?

These questions are the thread from which the study has been developed, focusing on the factors affecting leadership that put social responsibility as the foundation of behaviors, actions and strategies to be disseminated and shared inside and outside the company.

First, the work offers an analysis of the leadership theoretical framework paying specific attention to values and virtues-based models of leadership. Secondly, the paper presents the first results of an empirical analysis, centered on an exemplary case study relative to a company—the Loccioni Group—which has for years built the CSR-orientation into its mission and governance model and, recently, has been implementing a project aimed to assess virtues among its stakeholders, departing from its employees. The results of the study have both scientific and managerial implications and they underline the need for developing a methodology that allows further empirical research on the relationship between ethical values, humanistic education, family and social structures and the development of an authentic CSR model of entrepreneurial leadership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Moral behavior is defined as the ability to implement justice requirements derived from a fair distribution of rights and duties in a demanding operational context (Greenberg & Colquitt, 2005).

  2. 2.

    The Leadership Virtues Questionnaire (LVQ) was developed through successive pilot tests representing over 1000 managers.

  3. 3.

    The activities include: integrated technologies for environmental monitoring; measurement and quality control; biomedicine and medical equipments; telecommunication and environmental control; green energy; training and consultancy for businesses technical and managerial education.

References

  • Alford, H., & Signori, S. (2014). Brief considerations on the effectiveness of shareholder activism. A virtue ethics approach. Impresa Progetto-Electronic Journal of Management, 3, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argandoña, A. (2003). Fostering values in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argandoña, A. (2011). Beyond contracts: Love in firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1980). The Nicomachean ethics (D. Ross, Trans). Oxford, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartocci, M. (2011). Animal spirits in Vallesina. Enrico Loccioni e “l’impresa come gioco”. Milano: Luiss University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastons, M. (2008). The role of virtues in the framing of decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battaly, H. (2010). Introduction. Virtue and vice. Metaphilosophy, 41(1–2), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. (1998). Integrity in organizations: Beyond honesty and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertland, A. (2009). Virtue ethics in business and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, L. (2011). Spirituality and economic democracy. In L. Zsolani (Ed.), Spirituality and ethics in management. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. T. (2005). Corporate integrity. Rethinking organizational ethics and leadership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. B. (2011). The building of a virtuous transformational leader. The Journal of Virtues and Leadership, 2(1), 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 596–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L. (2012). Le nuove virtù del mercato nell’era dei beni comuni. Roma: Città Nuova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L., & Sena, B. (Eds.). (2013). The charismatic principle in social life. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (2004). Foreword. In J. B. Ciulla (Ed.), Ethics, the heart of leadership (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge, R. S. (2015). Leadership. In S. O. Idowu, N. Capaldi, M. Fifka, L. Zu, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Dictionary of corporate social responsibility (pp. 297–298). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capaldi, N. (2013). How American spiritual capital inform business and affects the common good. In S. Groschl (Ed.), Uncertainty, diversity and the common good. Changing norms and new leadership paradigms (pp. 25–40). Surrey: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: Corporate responsibility and model of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2000). Systemic leadership: Ethical and effective. The Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 21(4), 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contrafatto, M. (2011). Social and environmental accounting and engagement research: Reflections on the state of the art and new research avenues. Economia Aziendale Online, 2(3), 273–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortright, S. A., & Naughton, M. J. (2002). Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the catholic social tradition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A., & Rothstein, H. (2006). The effects of the perceived behavioral integrity of managers on employee attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Baldo, M. (2013a). CSR-oriented SMEs: A question of entrepreneurial virtues in action? Reflections in theory and practice. In J. O. Okpara & S. O. Idowu (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility. Challenges, opportunities and strategies for 21st century leaders (pp. 145–170). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Baldo, M. (2013b). Stakeholders management approach in Italian ‘territorial’ companies. Loccioni Group and the ‘land of values—LOV’ project. European Journal of International Management, 7(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Baldo, M. (2014). To the roots of entrepreneurial values: The relationship with the territory as a driver for the development of corporate social responsibility—An analysis of the experiences of Italian SMEs. In A. Yuksel Mermod & S. O. Idowu (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in the global business world (pp. 169–189). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Baldo, M. (2015). Charismatic leadership. In S. O. Idowu, N. Capaldi, M. Fifka, L. Zu, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Dictionary of corporate social responsibility (pp. 74–75). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1994). Social intelligence and democracy. In J. Gouinlock (Ed.), The moral writings of John Dewey (pp. 56–81). New York, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, D. M., & Hoffman, W. M. (2000). How to implement values-driven management. Walham, MA: Bentley College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S., & Banerjee, S. (2011). Ethical practices towards employees in small enterprises: A quantitative index. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 2(3), 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores, S. L., & Green, M. T. (2013). The importance of small business leader virtues. Small Business Institute, National Conference Proceedings, Winter, 37(1), 252–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, G. (2008). The virtuous manager: A vision for leadership in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 693–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (2007). Entrepreneurial narrative and a science of the imagination. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 613–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globe. (2008). Global leadership and organizational behavior effectiveness. Culture and Leader Effectiveness. Retrieved July 23, 2013, from www.ccl.org/leadership/pdf/GlobeStudy

  • Gottlieb, J. Z., & Sanzgiri, J. (1996). Towards an ethical dimension of decision making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12), 1275–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GPTW. (2013). Great place to work, 2013. Great Place to Work Institute. http://www.greatplacetowork.com; http://www.greatplacetowork.it

  • Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J. A. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership. New York: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K. (1991). The servant as leader. Indianapolis, IN: Robert Greenleaf Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui, B., & Sugden, R. (2005). Economics and social interactions. Accounting for interpersonal relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E. M. (1998). The role of character in business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 547–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetland, H. (2004). Leading to the extraordinary? Antecedents and outcomes of transformational leadership. Bergen: University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoivik von Weltzien, H. (2014). The heart of leadership is ethics. Impresa Progetto-Electronic Journal of Management, 11, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoivik von Weltzien, H., & Melé, D. (2009). Can a SME become a global corporate citizen? Evidence from a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 551–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istao. (2014). Marchegian excellent companies—Classifica delle principali imprese marchigiane, anno 2013. Ancona: Istao, Fondazione Aristide Merloni, Ottobre 2014. Retrived on November 2014, from http://www.fondazione-merloni.it

  • Jacobsen, C. (2001). Dynamics of charismatic leadership: A process theory, simulation model, and tests. Leadership Quarterly, 12(1), 75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2009). Ethics programs and ethical culture: A next step in unravelling their multi-faceted relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M., & Wempe, G. (2002). The balanced company: A theory of corporate integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ketola, T. (2008). A holistic corporate responsibility model: Integrating values, discourses and actions. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, H. R., & Mey, M. R. (2010). An ethics model to develop an ethical organisation. South African Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive developmental approach. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue. A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloch, T. R. (2008). Spiritual enterprises. Doing virtuous business. New York, NY: Encounter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K., & Cullen, J. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, M., Thomas, R., Leipziger, D., & Coleman, G. (2003). Living corporate citizenship: Strategic routes to socially responsible business. London: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. (2009). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naumes, W., & Naumes, M. J. (2006). The art and craft of case writing (2nd ed.). London: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M., & Butterfield, K. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, O. K. (2010). Are good leaders moral leaders? The relationship between effective military operational leadership and morals. Dissertation for the philosophiae doctor degree (PhD) at the University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreg, S., & Berson, Y. (2011). Leadership and employees’ reactions to change: The role of leaders’ personal attributes and transformational leadership style. Personnel Psychology, 64(3), 627–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. S. (1994). Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 106–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter-Morland, M. (2008). Systemic leadership and the emergence of ethical responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 509–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, K. W., & Proctor-Thomson, S. B. (2002). Perceived integrity of transformational leaders in organizational settings. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieper, J. (1966). The four cardinal virtues: Prudence, justice, fortitude, temperance. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, P. (2001). The question of organizational consciousness: Can organizations have values, virtues and visions? Journal of Business Ethics, 29, 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, P. (2011). Spirituality as the context for leadership. In L. Zsolani (Ed.), Spirituality and ethics in management. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., & Narvaez, D. (1994). Moral development in the profession, psychology and applied ethics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revell, A., & Blackburn, R. (2007). The business case for sustainability? An examination of small firms in the UK’s construction and restaurant sectors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, 404–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhode, D. L. (2006). Introduction: Where is the leadership in moral leadership? In D. L. Rhode (Ed.), Moral leadership, the theory and practice of power, judgment and policy (pp. 1–53). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, D., & Engle, S. (1986). After the vision: Suggests to corporate visionaries and vision champions. In J. D. Adams (Ed.), Transforming leadership (pp. 199–215). Alexandria, VA: Miles River Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. E., Zhu, W., Reina, C., & Maroosis, J. A. (2010). Virtue-based measurement of ethical leadership: The leadership virtues questionnaire. Consulting Psychology Journal, 62(4), 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruisi, M. (2009). Antropologia ed etica aziendale. Note sul tema di trascendentali e virtù imprenditoriali. Milano: Giuffré.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruisi, M. (2010, September 9–11). Measure entrepreneurial virtues. Towards a new perspective for the indicators of corporate success. Paper presented at the 23rd Eben Annual Conference Which values for which organisations? Trento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruisi, M., Fasone, V., & Paternostro, S. (2009, April 17–18). Respect and hope a binomial relationship supporting the creation of a true entrepreneurial model. Paper presented at Respect and economic democracy, Fifth Annual Conference of the European SPES Forum, Catania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauser, W. I., Jr. (2005). Ethics in business: Answering the call. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(4), 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. L. (1999). Behavioral integrity as a critical ingredient for transformational leadership. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12, 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, C. R. (1992a). Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in business. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (1992b). Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(3), 317–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J. (1999). Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(3), 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., & Lozano, J. F. (2000). Communicating about ethics with small firms: Experiences from the U.K. and Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unioncamere. (2003). Models of corporate social responsibility in Italy, executive summary. Rome: Italian Union of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Craft and Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varvelli, M. R., & Varvelli, R. (2014). 2Km di futuro. L’impresa di seminare bellezza. Milano: Il Sole 24 Ore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W. (2011). The nature of CSR leadership. Definitions, characteristics and paradoxes (CSR International Paper Series, 4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Ahsen, A. (2015). Sustainability leadership. In S. O. Idowu, N. Capaldi, M. Fifka, L. Zu, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Dictionary of corporate social responsibility (p. 444). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyakarnam, S., Bailey, A., Myers, A., & Burnett, D. (1997). Towards an understanding of ethical behaviour in small firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(15), 1625–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society (Vol. I–II). Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A. C., & Freeman, R. E. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, antipositivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9(2), 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S. (2006). Responsible competitiveness: Reshaping global markets through responsible business practices. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 334–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni, S. (Ed.). (1995). The economics of altruism. Hants: E. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mara Del Baldo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Del Baldo, M. (2017). Authentic CSR and Leadership: Towards a Virtues-Based Model of Stakeholder Dialogue and Engagement. The Loccioni Group Experience. In: Idowu, S., Vertigans, S. (eds) Stages of Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43536-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics