Skip to main content

Online Dating – A Unified and Unifying Symbolic Good Market

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Structure of Digital Partner Choice
  • 561 Accesses

Abstract

This last chapter will combine the lines of argumentation and provide a conclusive sociological understanding of the phenomenon ‘online dating’. Applying a Bourdieusian notion of ‘structure’, we will argue that the social distances between agents of different social classes, otherwise maintained by social, geographic, and institutional segregation in a largely direct way, are consolidated in digital partner markets in a particularly immediate way. In the ‘hyper-focus’ online dating, users – socially classified before even entering the market – classify themselves, their symbolic goods and their potential partners in the course of their practices and interactions. It is under the conditions of numeric abundance of potential partners from all social classes where the scarcity and hierarchy of symbolic goods already operative in the offline world come to light and can unfold their full force. A dating platform is a partner market with a unique efficacy, as it allows symbolic capital to operate very efficiently in its function of converting the users’ capital endowments. In the aggregate, users thereby create a particularly structured market, which reinforces the relations of societal domination also effective outside of the online dating market. In contrast to reductionist theories of individual choice, that conceive of the market’s structure as condition and outcome of individual preferences only, the Bourdieusian conceptualization helps us to understand the role of relational structuring practices. Given the fact that habitus is operative even in the supposedly structure-free sphere of online dating, this work makes a case for a sociological approach that remains sensitive to the aggregated effects of reproduction strategies in a realm closest to the idea of freedom of action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Given the increase of educational expansion in Western societies, mate choice research should analyze which different milieus and lifestyles are hidden behind formally identical educational attainments.

  2. 2.

    Further research may profit from this consideration, for example by relaxing the strong assumption of homophily in analysing homogeneity developments within international comparisons.

References

  • Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid life. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zeʾēv, A. (2004). Love online: Emotions on the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/cam032/2003055129.html

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words. Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). Physical space, social space and habitus. Lecture at the University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2008). The Bachelors’ Ball. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. P. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozon, M., & Heran, F. (2006). La formation du couple. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bühler-Illieva, E. (2006). Einen Mausklick von mir entfernt. Auf der Suche nach Liebesbeziehungen im Internet. Marburg: Tectum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (1993). Habitus, field, and capital: The question of historical specificity. In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives (pp. 61–88). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, A. (2004). Romantic regressions: An analysis of behavior in online dating systems. Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geser, H., & Bühler, I. (2006). Partnerwahl online. Retrieved from http://socio.ch/intcom/t_hgeser15.pdf

  • Hakim, C. (2010). Erotic capital. European Sociological Review, 26(5), 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (2002). How economics forgot history: The problem of historical specificity in social science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. (2012). Why love hurts. A sociological explanation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffmann, J. C. (2011). Sex@amour: Wie das Internet unser Liebesleben verändert. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebaron, F. (2001). Toward a new critique of economic discourse. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(5), 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. (2008). Preferences and choice constraints in marital sorting: Evidence from Korea. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunt, P. (2006). Rational choice theory versus cultural theory. On taste and social capital. In M. Altmann (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary behavioral economics: Foundations and developments (pp. 326–339). New York: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potarca, G., & Mills, M. (2013). Racial homophily and exclusion in online dating preferences: A cross-national comparison. Unpublished working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, A. (2012). Elective affinities 2.0? A Bourdieusian approach to couple formation and the methodology of E-Dating. Social Science Research on the Internet (RESET), 1(1), 175–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, A., & Zillmann, D. (2016). Online dating as a social sciences research tool. In F. X. Olleros, & M. Zhegu (Eds.), Research handbook of digital transformations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, A., Witte, D., & Gengnagel, V. (2016). Pluralizing field analysis: Toward a relational understanding of the field of power. Social Science Information/Information sur les sciences sociales (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2002). The fall of public man. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skopek, J. (2011). Partnerwahl im Internet: Eine quantitative Analyse von Strukturen und Prozessen der Online-Partnersuche. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skopek, J., Schmitz, A., & Blossfeld, H. P. (2011). The gendered dynamics of age preferences – Empirical evidence from online dating. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 23(3), 267–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D. (2016). Von kleinen Lügen und kurzen Beinen. Selbstdarstellung bei der Partnersuche im Internet [About little lies and small legs. Self-presentation in online dating]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., Schmitz, A., & Blossfeld, H. P. (2011). Lügner haben kurze Beine. Zum Zusammenhang unwahrer Selbstdarstellung und partnerschaftlicher Chancen im Online-Dating. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 23(3), 291–318.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmitz, A. (2017). Online Dating – A Unified and Unifying Symbolic Good Market. In: The Structure of Digital Partner Choice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43530-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43530-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43529-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43530-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics