Abstract
This last chapter will combine the lines of argumentation and provide a conclusive sociological understanding of the phenomenon ‘online dating’. Applying a Bourdieusian notion of ‘structure’, we will argue that the social distances between agents of different social classes, otherwise maintained by social, geographic, and institutional segregation in a largely direct way, are consolidated in digital partner markets in a particularly immediate way. In the ‘hyper-focus’ online dating, users – socially classified before even entering the market – classify themselves, their symbolic goods and their potential partners in the course of their practices and interactions. It is under the conditions of numeric abundance of potential partners from all social classes where the scarcity and hierarchy of symbolic goods already operative in the offline world come to light and can unfold their full force. A dating platform is a partner market with a unique efficacy, as it allows symbolic capital to operate very efficiently in its function of converting the users’ capital endowments. In the aggregate, users thereby create a particularly structured market, which reinforces the relations of societal domination also effective outside of the online dating market. In contrast to reductionist theories of individual choice, that conceive of the market’s structure as condition and outcome of individual preferences only, the Bourdieusian conceptualization helps us to understand the role of relational structuring practices. Given the fact that habitus is operative even in the supposedly structure-free sphere of online dating, this work makes a case for a sociological approach that remains sensitive to the aggregated effects of reproduction strategies in a realm closest to the idea of freedom of action.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Given the increase of educational expansion in Western societies, mate choice research should analyze which different milieus and lifestyles are hidden behind formally identical educational attainments.
- 2.
Further research may profit from this consideration, for example by relaxing the strong assumption of homophily in analysing homogeneity developments within international comparisons.
References
Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ben-Zeʾēv, A. (2004). Love online: Emotions on the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/cam032/2003055129.html
Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words. Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford: University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1996). Physical space, social space and habitus. Lecture at the University of Oslo.
Bourdieu, P. (2008). The Bachelors’ Ball. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. P. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Bozon, M., & Heran, F. (2006). La formation du couple. Paris: La Découverte.
Bühler-Illieva, E. (2006). Einen Mausklick von mir entfernt. Auf der Suche nach Liebesbeziehungen im Internet. Marburg: Tectum.
Calhoun, C. (1993). Habitus, field, and capital: The question of historical specificity. In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives (pp. 61–88). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66.
Fiore, A. (2004). Romantic regressions: An analysis of behavior in online dating systems. Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.
Geser, H., & Bühler, I. (2006). Partnerwahl online. Retrieved from http://socio.ch/intcom/t_hgeser15.pdf
Hakim, C. (2010). Erotic capital. European Sociological Review, 26(5), 499–518.
Hodgson, G. M. (2002). How economics forgot history: The problem of historical specificity in social science. New York: Routledge.
Illouz, E. (2012). Why love hurts. A sociological explanation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kauffmann, J. C. (2011). Sex@amour: Wie das Internet unser Liebesleben verändert. Konstanz: UVK.
Lebaron, F. (2001). Toward a new critique of economic discourse. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(5), 123–129.
Lee, S. (2008). Preferences and choice constraints in marital sorting: Evidence from Korea. Working Paper.
Lunt, P. (2006). Rational choice theory versus cultural theory. On taste and social capital. In M. Altmann (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary behavioral economics: Foundations and developments (pp. 326–339). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Potarca, G., & Mills, M. (2013). Racial homophily and exclusion in online dating preferences: A cross-national comparison. Unpublished working paper.
Schmitz, A. (2012). Elective affinities 2.0? A Bourdieusian approach to couple formation and the methodology of E-Dating. Social Science Research on the Internet (RESET), 1(1), 175–202.
Schmitz, A., & Zillmann, D. (2016). Online dating as a social sciences research tool. In F. X. Olleros, & M. Zhegu (Eds.), Research handbook of digital transformations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (forthcoming).
Schmitz, A., Witte, D., & Gengnagel, V. (2016). Pluralizing field analysis: Toward a relational understanding of the field of power. Social Science Information/Information sur les sciences sociales (forthcoming).
Sennett, R. (2002). The fall of public man. London: Penguin.
Skopek, J. (2011). Partnerwahl im Internet: Eine quantitative Analyse von Strukturen und Prozessen der Online-Partnersuche. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Skopek, J., Schmitz, A., & Blossfeld, H. P. (2011). The gendered dynamics of age preferences – Empirical evidence from online dating. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 23(3), 267–290.
Zillmann, D. (2016). Von kleinen Lügen und kurzen Beinen. Selbstdarstellung bei der Partnersuche im Internet [About little lies and small legs. Self-presentation in online dating]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag (forthcoming).
Zillmann, D., Schmitz, A., & Blossfeld, H. P. (2011). Lügner haben kurze Beine. Zum Zusammenhang unwahrer Selbstdarstellung und partnerschaftlicher Chancen im Online-Dating. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 23(3), 291–318.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmitz, A. (2017). Online Dating – A Unified and Unifying Symbolic Good Market. In: The Structure of Digital Partner Choice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43530-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43530-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43529-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43530-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)