Abstract
To learn about science, English language learners (ELLs) need to be able to understand the language of science, as language is an integral part of learning science content. Science teachers need to be prepared for meeting ELLs’ content and language needs. Because of the growing number of ELLs in mainstream classes, all teachers – not just bilingual or English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) specialists – need to be prepared for meeting ELLs’ content and language needs. The context of this chapter is a teacher preparation model that started in California and was applied in Indiana, New York, and Florida with both in-service and pre-service teacher. Over the course of the past 10 years, elementary and secondary teachers learned about a language-based approach to content instruction (LACI) to address the content and language needs of ELLs in their classes. This chapter argues that LACI enables teachers to simultaneously focus on language and content in the content area of science. Using examples from classroom discourse in a fourth-grade classroom in Indiana, the chapter presents principles – the 6 Cs of support – for implementing LACI in science instruction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Athanases, S. Z., & de Oliveira, L. C. (2011). Toward program-wide coherence in preparing teachers to teach and advocate for English language learners. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 195–215). New York: Routledge.
Athanases, S. Z., & de Oliveira, L. C. (2014). Scaffolding versus structured assistance for Latina/o youth in an urban school: Tensions in building toward disciplinary literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 263–299.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bunch, G. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37, 298–341.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Walking the road: Race, diversity, and social justice in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Davison, C., & Williams, A. (2001). Integrating language and content: Unresolved issues. In B. Mohan, C. Leung, & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream (pp. 51–70). Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
de Oliveira, L. C. (2007). Academic language development in the content areas: Challenges for English language learners. INTESOL Journal, 4(1), 22–33.
de Oliveira, L. C. (2011). In their shoes: Teachers feel like English language learners through a math simulation. Multicultural Education, 19(1), 59–62.
de Oliveira, L. C., & Dodds, K. N. (2010). Beyond general strategies for English language learners: Language dissection in science. The Electronic Journal of Literacy Through Science, 9(1), 1–14. Available online at http://ejlts.ucdavis.edu/article/2010/9/1/beyond-general-strategies-english-language-learners-language-dissection-science
de Oliveira, L. C., & Lan, S.-W. (2014). Writing science in an upper elementary classroom: A genre- based approach to teaching English language learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25(1), 23–39.
de Oliveira, L. C., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2015). Focus on grammar and meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.
de Oliveira, L. C., & Yough, M. (Eds.). (2015) Preparing teachers to work with English language learners in mainstream classrooms. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing and TESOL Press.
de Oliveira, L. C., Lan, S.-W., & Dodds, K. (2013). Reading, writing, and talking science with English language learners. In J. Nagle (Ed.), English learner instruction through collaboration and inquiry in teacher education (pp. 3–23). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. [100 abstract proposals were submitted for this book and 12 accepted]
Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 491–520.
Fang, Z. (2012). Approaches to developing content area literacies: A synthesis and a critique. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 56(2), 111–116.
Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2008). Reading in secondary content areas: A language-based pedagogy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 53(7), 587–597.
Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging discourses in the ESL classroom: Students, teachers, and researchers. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
Hammond, J. (2006). High challenge, high support: Integrating language and content instruction for diverse learners in an English literature classroom. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 269–283.
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 20(1), 6.
Hansen, L. (2006). Strategies for ELL success. Science and Children, 43(4), 22–25.
Harcourt. (2005). Harcourt science: Indiana edition. Orlando: Harcourt.
Keenan, S. (2004). Reaching English language learners: Strategies for teaching science in diverse classrooms. Science and Children, 42(2), 49–51.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, O., & Miller, E. (2016). Engaging in phenomena from project-based learning in a place-based context in science. In L. C. de Oliveira (Ed.), The Common Core State Standards for literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects for English language learners. Alexandria: TESOL Press.
Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdes, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for Common Core State Standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233.
Lucas, T., & Grinberg, J. (2008). Responding to the linguistic reality of mainstream classrooms: Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & J. Mclntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 606–636). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2010). The growing numbers of limited English proficient students: 1999/2000–2009/10. Retrieved from http://www.ncela.us/files/uploads/9/growing_EL_0910.pdf
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010a). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Authors.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010b). Application of Common Core State Standards for English language learners. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/application-for-english-learners.pdf
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nieto, S. (2000). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
Schleppegrell, M. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education, 12, 431–459.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: SUNY Press.
Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers: A coherent approach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Oliveira, L.C. (2017). A Language-Based Approach to Content Instruction (LACI) in Science for English Language Learners. In: Oliveira, A., Weinburgh, M. (eds) Science Teacher Preparation in Content-Based Second Language Acquisition. ASTE Series in Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43516-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43516-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43514-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43516-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)