Abstract
Circumstantial evidentiality refers to the semantic-pragmatic-grammatical encoding of an inference which has been drawn on some physical evidence surrounding the speech participants (cf. Squartini, Linguistics 46(5):917–947, 2008; J Pragmat 44(15):2116–2128, 2012; Cornillie, Funct Lang 16(1):44–62, 2009). Reportative evidentiality corresponds to the pragmatic-semantic-grammatical marking of a proposition as a piece of information the SP/W has been told by someone (i.e. Willett, Stud Lang 12(1):57–91, 1988; Aikhenvald, Evidentiality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004; Tantucci, J Pragmat 57:210–230, 2013).
This study will shed new light on the multimodal encoding of both by looking at the evidential meaning which emerges from the interplay of a constative speech act and the physical or socio-cultural situation in which this speech act occurs. The first part of this article is dedicated to some prototypical instances of circumstantial evidentiality. I will argue that the physical situation where a constative speech act occurs crucially constitutes the real evidential marker of a circumstantial-evidential utterance, regardless of the semantic-pragmatic-grammatical encoding of the proposition. I will propose that this sort of unescapable correspondence between a constative speech-act and the physical situation where this is realized, represents a felicitous example of evidential pragmeme (cf. Mey, Pragmatics: an introduction. 2nd ed. Vol. Blackwell, Oxford, 2001; J Pragmat 42(11):2882–2888, 2010; Capone, J Pragmat 37(9):1355–1371, 2005; J Pragmat 40(6):1019–1040, 2008; J Pragmat 42(2):377–391, 2010 on the notion of pragmemes), viz. the evidential meaning of a proposition that is obtained as the result of being conveyed ‘in the situation’.
In the second part of this study I will focus on reportative evidentiality. Concerning this latter domain, it is traditionally expected that new information occurring in news report registers should predictably appear in the form of an evidential construction or strategy. Contrary to this common assumption, I will provide corpus-based evidence showing that this is not the case. Focusing on the news report section of the written corpus of Mandarin LCMC (Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese (See http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/projects/corpus/LCMC/ for more information. Last accessed 20/10/15)), this study aims at showing that new information in Mandarin news report often tends to occur as an assertive speech act, and only subsequently marked as an evidential. I will propose that this recurring pattern corresponds to a conventionalized pragmeme of written news report in Mandarin Chinese. Namely, the situated context where new information comes into play (i.e. news report articles from newspapers, news blogs/websites), together with the conventionalized expectation of a subsequent evidential marking, constitute a standardized pattern of news report in written Mandarin Chinese. As a result, the both situational and textual matrix of this pragmeme allows the writer to convey reportative evidentiality even in cases where a proposition formally occurs as a bare assertion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The latter is said to refer to Aikhenvald’s category (2004) of assumed evidentiality.
- 2.
In (9) the epistemic modal potere is acceptable as it expresses a comparatively lower commitment to the evaluation, which can clearly map the meaning of a conjecture.
- 3.
See McEnery and Xiao (2004) for more information about this corpus.
- 4.
The apostrophe indicates that P’ is a different proposition from P.
- 5.
Stands for evidential stance.
- 6.
Stands for assertive stance.
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boas, F. (1938). Language. In F. Boas (Ed.), General anthropology (pp. 124–145). New York: D. C. Heath Company.
Capone, A. (2005). Pragmemes (a study with reference to English and Italian). Journal of Pragmatics, 37(9), 1355–1371.
Capone, A. (2008). Belief reports and pragmatic intrusion (the case of null appositives). Journal of Pragmatics, 40(6), 1019–1040.
Capone, A. (2010). On the social practice of indirect reports (further advances in the theory of pragmemes). Journal of Pragmatics, 42(2), 377–391.
Chappell, H. (2001). A typology of evidential markers in sinitic languages. In H. Chappell (Ed.), Chinese grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives (pp. 56–85). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cornillie, B. (2007). Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish (semi-) auxiliaries: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Cornillie, B. (2009). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language, 16(1), 44–62.
Evans, V. (2007). A glossary of cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Faller, M. (2002). Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD. Palo Alto: Stanford University.
Floyd, R. (1997). La estructura categorial de los evidenciales en el Quechua Wanka. Lima: Instituto Linguistico de Verano.
Floyd, R. (1999). The structure of evidential categories in Wanka Quechua. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guentchéva, Z. (Ed.). (1996). L’énonciation médiatisée. Louvain: Peeters.
Guentchéva, Z., & Londaburu, J. (Eds.). (2007). L’énonciation médiatisée (Vol. 2). Louvain: Peeters.
Hopper, P. J. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 213–241). New York: Academic Press.
Kamio, A. (1997). Territory of information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kecskes, I. (2010). Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 2889–2897.
Kurzon, D. (1998). The speech act status of incitement: Perlocutionary acts revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(5), 571–596.
Lazard, G. (1996). Le médiatif en persan. In Z. Guentchéva (Ed.), L’énonciation médiatisée (pp. 21–30). Louvain: Peeters.
Lazard, G. (1999). Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other? Linguistic Typology, 3(1), 91–109.
Lazard, G. (2001). On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 359–367.
McEnery, A., & Xiao, Z. (2004). The Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese: A corpus for monolingual and contrastive language study. Religion, 17, 3–4.
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Mey, J. L. (2010). Reference and the pragmeme. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 2882–2888.
Mushin, I. (2001). Evidentiality and epistemological stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nuyts. (2001). Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pedersen, T. (1996). Fishing for exactness. SCSUG 96, Austin, TX.
Pike, K. L. (1954/1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague: Mouton.
Pulte, W. (1985). The experienced and non experienced past in Cherokee. International Journal of American Linguistics, 51, 543–544.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (Vol. 626). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Squartini, M. (2008). Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian. Linguistics, 46(5), 917–947.
Squartini, M. (2012). Evidentiality in interaction: The concessive use of the Italian future between grammar and discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(15), 2116–2128.
Tantucci, V. (2013). Interpersonal evidentiality: The Mandarin V-过guo construction and other evidential systems beyond the ‘source of information’. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 210–230.
Tantucci, V. (2015a). Traversativity and grammaticalization: The aktionsart of 过guo as a lexical source of evidentiality. Chinese Language and Discourse, 6(1), 57–100.
Tantucci, V. (2015b). Epistemic inclination and factualization: A synchronic and diachronic study on the semantic gradience of factuality. Language and Cognition, 7(3), 371–414.
Tantucci, V. (2016a). Towards a typology of constative speech acts: Actions beyond evidentiality, epistemic modality and factuality. Intercultural Pragmatics, 13(2), 181–209.
Tantucci, V. (2016b). Textual factualization: The phenomenology of assertive reformulation and presupposition during a speech event. Journal of Pragmatics, 101, 155–171.
Tantucci, V. (2016c). Immediate and extended intersubjectification in language change: Beyond the opposition between theory-theory and simulation-theory. In O.'. N. Sean (Ed.), Dualism, platonism and voluntarism: Explorations at the quantum, microscopic, mesoscopic and symbolic neural levels. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Traugott, E. C. (1995). Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In D. Stein & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation (pp. 31–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Willett, T. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12(1), 57–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tantucci, V. (2016). The Multimodal Marking of Evidentiality: Pragmemes of Circumstantial Inference and Mandarin Written News Report. In: Allan, K., Capone, A., Kecskes, I. (eds) Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43490-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43491-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)