A Conceptual Model of the Relationship Between Aligned Innovations and Sustainable Development for Project-Based Organizations

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)


This paper is a critical review of the conceptual models that are developed in the area of finding motivators behind different parties’ alignment to implement innovation and to develop more sustainable projects. Different parties always have diversified interests. The alignment of those parties has to have drivers, but at the same time it has also challenges. Investigations of drivers and challenges will facilitate better achievement of sustainable development goals. Alignment of organizational projects creates new opportunities in the market for those projects. The second part of this research paper presents a conceptual model architecture. This model is explaining inhibitors and reinforcements for having innovative projects. The model shows that innovative projects have certain characteristics. The purpose of innovative projects in this research is alignment and resources optimization for better sustainability. The main goal of the research is providing an approach for best practice of achieving sustainability among innovative projects.


Innovation Sustainable Development Alignment 


  1. Abousamra, R. (2002) The relationship between the characteristics of intra-group conflict and the levels of organizational conflict—Applied research on the Egyptian constructions sector (Unpublished Master Thesis, Ein Shams Library).Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1989). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8(4), 310–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreeva, T., & Kianto, A. (2011). Knowledge processes, knowledge-intensity and innovation: A moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 1016–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, A., & Foley, P. (2003). Foundations for a learning organization: Organization learning mechanisms. The Learning Organization, 10(2), 74–82. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arumugam, V., Antony, J., & Kumar, M. (2013). Production economics linking learning and knowledge creation to project success in Six Sigma projects: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 141(1), 388–402. Retrieved from Scholar
  6. Barnaba, V., Paroli, M., & Piconese, S. (2012). The ambiguity in immunology. Frontiers in Immunology, 3. 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00018.Google Scholar
  7. Bessant, J., & Tidd, J. (2011). Innovation and entrepreneurship (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Besterfield, D. H., Besterfield-Michna, C., & Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2011). Total quality management (3rd ed.). Delhi: Pearson Education India.Google Scholar
  9. Boeck, H., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2008). RFID and buyer‐seller relationships in the retail supply chain. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 36(6), 433–460. 10.1108/09590550810873929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brennan, D. R., Turnbull, P. W., & Wilson, D. T. (2003). Dyadic adaptation in business-to-business markets. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12), 1636–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brix, J., & Lauridsen, K. M. (2012). Learning styles and organizational development in practice: An exploratory study of how learning styles and individual learning strategies can facilitate organizational development. International Journal of Innovation and Leaning, 12(2), 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cardwell, D. (2013, January 22). LEDS emerge as popular green lights. New York Times. Retrieved from
  13. Chen, W. W., & Deo, R. S. (2006). The variance ratio statistic at large horizons. Econometric Theory, 22(2). 10.1017/s0266466606060099.Google Scholar
  14. Dulaimi, M. F., Alhashemi, M., Ling, F. Y. Y., & Kumaraswamy, M. (2010). The execution of public–private partnership projects in the UAE. Construction Management and Economics, 28(4), 393–402. 10.1080/01446191003702492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dulaimi, M., & Ang, A. F. (2009). Elements of learning organisations in Singapore’s construction industry. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research, 14(1), 83–92.Google Scholar
  16. Dulaimi, M., & Kumaraswamy, M. (2000). Procuring for innovation: The integrating role of innovation in construction procurement. In Proceedings of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Glasgow, UK.Google Scholar
  17. Dulaimi, M., Nepal, M., & Park, M. (2005). A hierarchical structural model of assessing innovation and project performance. Construction Management and Economics, 23(6), 565–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ergano, K., Duncan, A., Adie, A., Tedla, A., Woldewahid, G., Ayele, Z., et al. (2001). Implementation challenges of innovation systems perspective in Fodder production in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: International Livestock Research Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, M. A., & Capper, J. M. (2000). Obstacles and opportunities for technological innovation in business teaching and learning. International Journal of Management Education, 1, 37–47.Google Scholar
  20. Gima, K., & Li, H. (2000). Marketing’s influence tactics in new product development: A study of high technology firms in China. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Golipour, R., Jandaghi, G., Mirzaei, T., & Arbatan, R. (2011). The impact of organizational trust on innovativeness at the Tehran oil refinery company. African Journal of Business Management, 5(7), 2660–2667.Google Scholar
  22. Gratton, L. (2007). Hot spots. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  23. Grey, S. (2014, July). Unknown unknowns. Published under Enterprise risk management and ISO 31000, Project risk management and IEC 62198, Risk assessment. Retrieved July 2014, from
  24. Güttel, W., & Konlechner, S. W. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and competence obsolescence: Empirical data from research-intensive firms. Learning Fusion. p. 357.Google Scholar
  25. Hammuda, I., & Dulaimi, M. (1996). Empowering the organization: A comparative study of different approaches to empowerment. In CIB Beijing International Conference, China, 21–24 October.Google Scholar
  26. Hammuda, I., & Dulaimi, M. (1997). The theory and application of empowerment: A comparative study of the different approaches to empowerment in construction, service, and manufacturing industries. International Journal of Project Management, 5(5), 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Handy, C. (1999). Understanding organizations (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. (2000, May/June). Building an innovation factory. HBR, pp. 157–166.Google Scholar
  29. Harrison, S., Rouse, E. D., & Amabile, T. M. (2014). Flipping the script: Creativity as an antecedent. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 10457–10457. 10.5465/ambpp.2014.10457symposium.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hofseted, G., & Hofstede, G. (2004). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  31. Jamali, D., & Sidani, Y. (2008). Learning organizations: Diagnosis and measurement in a developing country context. The Learning Organization, 15(1), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and inter-organizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mayer, M. (2006, May 17). License to pursue dreams. Stanford Technology Ventures Program/Stanford School of Engineering. Retrieved June 20, 2012, from
  34. Mayle, D. (2006). Innovation in practice. In J. Henry & D. Mayle (Eds.), Creativity, innovation and change media book (pp. 33–38). Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar
  35. McCaffer, R., & Edum-Fotwe, F. T. (2000). Engineering and the future of construction. Industry: Realities and emerging possibilities. In: Proceedings, 4th Asia-Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (APSEC 2000), September 13–16, 2000, Kuala Lumpur (pp. 33–40).Google Scholar
  36. McKenna, E. (2012). Business psychology and organizational behavior: A student handbook (5th ed.). Hove, England: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  37. Møller, A. P. (2008). Interactions between interactions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1133(1), 180–186. 10.1196/annals.1438.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nicholls, R. J., & Branson, J. (1998). Coastal resilience and planning for an uncertain future: An introduction. The Geographical Journal, 164(3), 255. 10.2307/3060614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paletz, S. B. F., & Schunn, C. D. (2010). A social-cognitive framework of multidisciplinary team innovation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(1), 73–95. 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01029.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patterson, F., Kerrin, M., Gatto-Roissard, G., & Coan, P. (2009). Everyday innovation: How to enhance innovative working in employees and organisations. London, UK: NESTA.Google Scholar
  42. Schein, E. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, A., & Yousuf, H. (2012, January 19). Kodak files for bankrupcy. CNNMoney. Retrieved July 20, 2012, from
  44. Stelling, A., Millar, J., Phengsavanh, P., & Stur, W. (2006). Establishing learning alliances between extension organizations: Key learnings from Laos. Extension Farming Systems Journal, 5(1), 221–234.Google Scholar
  45. Tidd, J. (2001). Innovation management in context: Environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(3), 169–183. 10.1111/1468-2370.00062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2013). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organisational change (5th ed.). West Sussex, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Tomescu, M., Bucurean, M., Abrudan, M., & Rosca, R. (2004). Ten key concepts and the success of Romanian organizations (p. 120). Bucharest: University of Oradea CODECS Publishing House.Google Scholar
  48. Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2011). Product design and development (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  49. Walter, A., Helfert, G., & Müller, T. A. (2000). The impact of satisfaction, trust, and relationship value on commitment: Theoretical considerations and empirical results. Paper presented at the 16th IMP Conference, Bath.Google Scholar
  50. Weir, M., Huggins, R., Schiuma, G., & Lerro, A. (2003). Valuing knowledge assets in renewable energy SMEs: Some early evidence. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(2), 225–234.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher Colleges of TechnologyBritish University in DubaiDubaiUAE
  2. 2.British University in DubaiUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations