Advertisement

An Approach Towards Assessing Effective IT Governance Setting: Malaysia Public Sector Case Study

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

Great strides have been made in IT governance in the past decade. Today’s organizations need a flexible, complementary, and collaborative IT governance setting to prosper in a turbulent environment that would enable organizations to sustain realizing value from IT instead of restraining its contribution by emphasizing control. The review of existing literature to identify and determine best practices had been studied by previous researchers in order to construct the factors within each category. The aim of this paper is to identify the domain of IT governance and provide insights practice with each domain that was detected through literature.

Keywords

IT governance IT governance mechanism IT decision-making 

References

  1. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 368–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowen, P. L., Cheung, M. Y. D., & Rohde, F. H. (2007). Enhancing IT governance practices: A model and case study of an organization’s efforts”. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 8(3), 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brisebois, R., Boyd, G., & Shadid, Z. (2007, August). Canada—What is IT governance? And why is it important for the IS auditor? into IT. The INTOSAI IT Journal, 25, 30–35. Retrieved from http://www.intosaiitaudit.org/intoit_articles/25_p30top35.pdf
  4. Broadbent, M. (2003). The right combination. Retrieved April 11, 2003, from www.cio.com
  5. Brown, A. E., & Grant, G. G. (2005). Framing the frameworks: A review of IT governance research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 696–712.Google Scholar
  6. Chin, P. O., Brown, G. A., & Hu, Q. (2004). The impact of mergers and acquisitions on IT governance structures: A case study. Journal of Global Information Management, 12(4), 50–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grant, G. G., Brown, A., Uruthirapathy, A., & McKnight, S. (2007). An extended model of IT governance: A conceptual proposal. In Proceedings of the 13th Americas Conference of the Information Systems, Keystone, CO.Google Scholar
  8. Gu, B., Xue, L., & Ray, G. (2008). IT governance and IT investment performance: An empirical analysis. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on Information Systems, Paris (pp. 1–17).Google Scholar
  9. Henderson, J. C., Venkatraman, N., & Oldach, S. (1996). Aligning business and IT strategies. In J. N. Luftman (Ed.), Competing in the information age: Strategic alignment in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Information Technology Governance Institute. (2003). Board briefing on IT governance. Retrieved July 7, 2008, from www.itgi.org/Template_ITGI.cfm?Section¼Recent_Publications&CONTENTID¼39652&TEMPLATE¼/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm
  11. Information Technology Governance Institute. (2008). Aligning COBIT®4.1, ITIL® V3 and ISO/IEC 27002 for business benefit. Retrieved November 10, 2010, from http://www.isaca.org/Knowledge-Center/Research/ResearchDeliverables/Pages/Aligning-COBIT-4-1-ITIL-V3-and-ISO-IEC-27002-for-BusinessBenefit.aspx
  12. Information Technology Governance Institute. (2009). An executive view of IT governance. Rolling Meadows, IL: Author.Google Scholar
  13. Luftman, J. N. (2002). Assessing IT-business alignment maturity. Communications of AIS, 4(14).Google Scholar
  14. Luftman, J. N. (2003). Assessing IT-business alignment. Information Systems Management, 20(4), 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luftman, J. N., & Brier, T. (1999). Achieving and sustaining business-IT alignment. California Management Review, 42(1), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ortiz, S. A. (2003). Testing a model of the relationships among organisational performance, IT-business alignment and IT governance (Unpublished PhD thesis, University of North Texas, Denton, TX).Google Scholar
  17. Patel, N. (2002). Emergent forms of IT governance to support global e-business models. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4(2), 33–48.Google Scholar
  18. Patel, N. (2004). An emerging strategy for e-business IT governance. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology governance. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.Google Scholar
  19. Peterson, R. R. (2002). Information technology governance processes under environmental dynamism: Investigating competing theories of decision making and knowledge sharing. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://latienda.ie.edu/working_papers_economia/WP02-31.pdf
  20. Peterson, R. (2004). Integration strategies and tactics for information technology governance. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology governance (pp. 37–74). Hershey, PA: IGI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rau, K. G. (2004). Effective governance of IT: Design objectives, roles and relationships. Information Systems Management, 21(4), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ribbers, P. M. A., Peterson, R. R., & Parker, M. M. (2002). Designing information technology governance processes: Diagnosing contemporary practices and competing theories. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI (pp. 1–12).Google Scholar
  23. Robinson, N. (2007). The many faces of IT governance: Crafting an IT governance architecture. Information Systems Control Journal, 1, 1–4.Google Scholar
  24. Schwartz, K. D. (2007, May). IT governance definition and solutions. IT governance topics covering definition, objectives, systems, and solutions. CIO. Retrieved from http://www.cio.com/article/111700/IT_Governance_Definition_and_Solutions#what
  25. Selig, G. (2008). Implementing IT governance: A practical guide to global best practices in IT management. Zaltbommel, The Netherlands: Van Haren.Google Scholar
  26. Symons, C. (2005). IT governance framework: Structures, processes and communication. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from www.cba.co.nz/download/Forr051103656300.pdf
  27. Van Grembergen, W. (2000). The balanced scorecard and IT governance. Information Systems Control Journal, 2, 40–3.Google Scholar
  28. Van Grembergen, W. (Ed.). (2003). Strategies for Information Technology Governance, . Hershey, PA: Idea Group.Google Scholar
  29. Van Grembergen, W., & de Haes, S. (2005). Measuring and improving IT governance through the Balanced Scorecard. ISACA Journal, 2.Google Scholar
  30. Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes, S. (2009). Enterprise governance of information technology: Achieving strategic alignment and value. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S., & Guldentops, E. (2004). Structures, processes, and relational mechanisms for IT governance. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology governance (pp. 1–36). Hershey, PA: IGI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ward, J., & Peppard, J. (2002). Strategic planning for information systems. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Weill, P. (2004). Don’t just lead govern: How top-performing firms govern IT. MIS Quarterly Executive, 3(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  34. Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior result. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  35. Weill, P., & Ross, J. (2005). A matrixed approach to designing IT governance. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(2), 26.Google Scholar
  36. Weiss, J., & Anderson, D. (2004). Aligning Technology and Business Strategy: Issues & Frameworks, A Field Study of 15 Companies, In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (Jan) 2004.Google Scholar
  37. Winniford, M., Conger, S., & Erickson-Harris, L. (2009). Confusion in the ranks: IT service management practice and terminology. Information Systems Management, 26(2), 153–163. doi: 10.1080/10580530902797532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zmud, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (1999). Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management Information System Department, Faculty of Information Science and TechnologyUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Information Science and TechnologyUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations