A Human Rights Approach to Bioethics

Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 70)


Human rights and bioethics are conceptually and operationally much closer than usually assumed. This is not surprising as both normative frameworks emerged from the same dramatic events: the Second World War, the Holocaust, and the Nuremberg trials. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) of 1948, which would become the cornerstone of the international human rights law, was to a significant extent informed by the horror caused by the revelation that prisoners of concentration camps, including children, were used by Nazi physicians as subjects of brutal experiments. This shocking discovery led the Nuremberg trial to develop in 1947 the famous ten principles for medical research, which have come to be known as the Nuremberg Code. In this regard, it has been reported that “the details revealed daily at Nuremberg gave content to the rights recognized by Articles 4 through 20 of the Declaration” (Baker 2001, p. 242). Similarly, it has been pointed out that “World War II was the crucible in which both human rights and bioethics were forged, and they have been related by blood ever since.” (Annas 2005, p. 160) The fact is that at present all major international ethical and policy instruments relating to bioethics adopt a human rights approach.


Human Dignity Universal Declaration Normative Framework Intergovernmental Organization Bioethical Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Andorno, Roberto. 2013a. International policy and a universal conception of human dignity. In Human dignity in bioethics: From worldviews to the public square, ed. Nathan J. Palpant and Stephan Dilley, 127–141. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Andorno, Roberto. 2013b. Principles of international biolaw. Seeking common ground at the intersection of bioethics and human rights. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
  3. Annas, George J. 2005. American bioethics. Crossing human rights and health law boundaries. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Annas, George J., Lori Andrews, and Rosario Isasi. 2002. Protecting the endangered human: Toward an international treaty prohibiting cloning and inheritable alterations. American Journal of Law and Medicine 28(2–3): 151–178.Google Scholar
  5. Ashcroft, Richard. 2010. Could human rights supersede bioethics? Human Rights Law Review 10(4): 639–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, Robert. 2001. Bioethics and human rights: A historical perspective. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10(3): 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blith, Eric, and Abigail Farrand. 2004. Anonymity in donor-assisted conception and the UN convention on the rights of the child. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 12(2): 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boussard, Helène. 2007. The ‘Normative Spectrum’ of an ethically-inspired legal instrument: The 2005 universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. In Biotechnologies and international human rights, ed. Francesco Francioni, 97–127. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Donnelly, Jack. 1989. Universal human rights in theory and practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Faunce, Thomas. 2005. Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration. Journal of Medical Ethics 31(3): 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gordijn, Bert, and Henk Ten Have. 2014. Future perspectives. In Handbook of global bioethics, ed. Henk Ten Have and Bert Gordijn, 829–844. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Habermas, Jürgen. 2003. The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jonas, Hans. 1985. Technik, Medizin und Genetik. Zur Praxis des Prinzips Verantwortung. Frankfurt: Insel.Google Scholar
  14. Kirby, Michael. 2006. UNESCO and universal principles on bioethics: What’s next? In Proceedings: Twelfth session of the international bioethics committee, ed. UNESCO. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  15. Knowles, Lori. 2001. The lingua franca of human rights and the rise of a global bioethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10: 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mann, Jonathan. 1996. Health and human rights. Protecting human rights is essential for promoting health. British Medical Journal 312: 924–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nickel, James. 1987. Making sense of human rights: Philosophical reflections on the universal declaration of human rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Schroeder, Doris. 2005. Human rights and their role in global bioethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14(2): 221–234.Google Scholar
  19. Schuklenk, Udo and Landman, Willem. 2005. From the editors. In Developing world bioethics. Special issue: Reflections on the UNESCO Draft Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights 5(3): iii–vi.Google Scholar
  20. Thomasma, David. 2001. Proposing a new agenda: Bioethics and international human rights. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10: 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 2000. General comment no. 14: The right to the highest attainable standard of health (Art. 12). Geneva: UN.Google Scholar
  22. UNESCO. 2005. Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations