Advertisement

New Technology for NGH Development and Production

  • Michael D. MaxEmail author
  • Arthur H. Johnson
Chapter
  • 684 Downloads

Abstract

The main area in which new technology and approaches has the potential to dramatically reduce the cost of natural gas hydrate (NGH) development is in drilling and reservoir planning, and preparation for production. Substantial existing technology and emerging methods being developed for ultra-deepwater, particularly those based on operating processing equipment on the seafloor rather than in vessels overhead, can be used in a re-specified form. New approaches to drilling and reservoir planning are made possible by matching technology to the unique characteristics of NGH in its reservoir, including the shallow depth below the seafloor of potential pay zones, the additional benefits of depressurization-dissociation conversion (Max and Johnson in Advances in clean hydrocarbon fuel processing: science and technology. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 413–434, 2011), and the fact that the converted NGH product (which consists almost entirely of relatively pure natural gas and very low salinity water) will be at substantially lower pressures within the reservoir. Not only can pressure in the reservoir be controlled, but it is possible to maintain different pressures in different parts of the reservoir to better control dissociation and water and gas movement. A completely new, integrated approach to drilling NGH deposits is intended to optimize the opportunities presented by NGH deposits.

Keywords

Technology innovation Exploration Production Drilling Coiled tubing Casing Active bottom hole assemblies Active tethered drilling Active wellbore lining Sand control Gas/water separation Active reservoir control Technology readiness level 

References

  1. Anderson, B., R. Boswell, T.S. Collett, H. Farrell, S. Ohtsuki, M. White, and M. Zyrianova. 2014. Review of the findings of the Iġnick Sikumi CO2–CH4 gas hydrate exchange field trial. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on gas hydrates (ICGH8-2014), July 28–August 1, Beijing, China, 17 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Beckman, J. 2014. ONS highlights next-phase deepwater drilling, subsea recovery challenges. Offshore 7(10): 44–45.Google Scholar
  3. BH. 2016. TeleCoil intelligent coiled tube services. Baker Hughes. http://www.bakerhughes.com/products-and-services/pressure-pumping/coiled-tubing-services/telecoil-downhole-communications-system. Accessed 23 Jan 2016.
  4. Boswell, R., T.S. Collett, M. Frye, W. Shedd, D.R. McConnell, and D. Shelander. 2012. Subsurface gas hydrates in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Marine and Petroleum Geology: 21 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.10.003.Google Scholar
  5. Bourillet, J.F., C. Augris, P. Cirac, J.P. Mazé, A. Normand, B. Loubrieu, A. Crusson, M. Gaudin, D. Poirier, C. Satra Le Bris, and L. Simplet. 2007. European ocean research fleets. Towards a Common Strategy and Enhanced Use Position Paper 10, European Science Foundation Marine Board, 64 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Brillon, C.L., R.S. Shafer, and A.A. Bello. 2007. Pushing the envelope with coil tubing drilling. American Association of Drilling Engineers, AADE-07-NTCE-31, 16 pp. http://www.slb.com/~/media/files/technical_papers/2007/07ntce31.pdf. Accessed 7 Mar 2016.
  7. Byrom, T.G. 1999. Coiled-tubing drilling in perspective. Journal of Petroleum Technology: 57–61.Google Scholar
  8. Carriere, G.J., and T.C. Gipson. 2003. Coiled tube drilling rig. U.S. Patent US 6,502,641 B1, 7 Jan 2003, 12 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Daigle, T.P., S.H. Hantz, B. Phillips, and R. Janjua. 2012. Treating and releasing produced water at the ultra-deepwater seabed. Offshore 74: 76–77.Google Scholar
  10. Daigle, H., A. Cook, and A. Malinverno. 2015. Permeability and porosity of hydrate-bearing sediments in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Marine and Petroleum Geology 68(A): 551–564.Google Scholar
  11. DOE. 2011. Technology readiness assessment guide. U.S. Department of Energy, particularly Table 7. Hardware TRL definitions, descriptions and supporting information, 73 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Durham, W.B., S.H. Kirby, and L.A. Stern. 2003. The strength and rheology of methane clathrate hydrate. Journal of Geophysical Research 108: 11 pp. doi: 10.1029/2002JB001872.
  13. Eldridge, A. 2013. Subsea industry: Drilling on the floor of the Arctic Ocean. http://www.albertaoilmagazine.com/2013/10/offshore-Arctic-drilling/. Accessed 22 June 2015.
  14. Fontenot, K.R., B. Lesso, R.D. Strickler, and T.M. Warren. 2005. Using casing to drill directional wells. Oilfield Review, Summer 2005: 44–61.Google Scholar
  15. Frye, M., W. Shedd, and R. Boswell. 2012. Gas hydrate resource potential in the Terrebonne Basin, Northern Gulf of Mexico. Marine and Petroleum Geology 34: 150–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fujii, T., K. Suzuki, T. Takayama, M. Tamaki, Y. Komatsu, Y. Konno, J. Yoneda, K. Yamamoto, and J. Nagao. 2015. Geological setting and characterization of a methane hydrate reservoir distributed at the first offshore production test site on the Daini-Atsumi Knoll in the eastern Nankai Trough, Japan. Marine and Petroleum Geology 66(1): 310–322. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gutenberg. 2015. List of research vessels by country. Guttenberg Press. http://www.self.gutenberg.org/articles/list_of_research_vessels_by_country. Accessed 2 Nov 2015.
  18. H2020. 2014. Work Programme, Extract from Part 19—Commission Decision C(2014)4995. http://ncp-space.net/are-you-familiar-with-the-technology-readiness-levels/. Accessed 22 Aug 2015.
  19. Hannegan, D.M. 2005. Methane hydrate drilling technology, OTC Paper 17448. In Proceedings of the offshore technology conference, 2–5 May 2005, Houston, TX3 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Hopkins, P., H. Saleh, and G. Jewell. 2015. Composite riser study confirms weight, fatigue benefits compared with steel. Offshore 70: 72, 74.Google Scholar
  21. Hydro. 2016. Eelume the snake robots, Pros and Cons. Hydrographic Catelogue. admin@hydrographic-catalogue.com. Accessed 15 May 2016.
  22. JOGMEC. 2013. News release: Gas production from methane hydrate layers confirmed. Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation, Tokyo, 3 pp. http://www.jogmec.go.jp/english/news/release/release0110.html. Accessed 26 Apr 2016.
  23. Johnson, A.H. 2012. Global resource potential of gas hydrate—A new calculation, U.S. DOE-NETL Fire in the Ice Newsletter. Fire in the Ice 11(2): 1–4.Google Scholar
  24. Kawamoto, T. 2013. The first offshore MH production test. PDF presentation. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/06/f1/Takami%20Kawamoto%20-%20The%20First%20Offshore%20Production%20Test.pdf. Accessed 22 Dec 2015.
  25. Khurana, S. 2015. Online exclusive: New strategy needed for deepwater development, unconventional plays. Offshore Digital Magazine, 29 Jan 15. http://www.offshore-mag.com/articles/2015/01/online-exclusive-new-strategy-needed-for-deepwater-development-unconventional-plays.html. Accessed 29 May 2015.
  26. Kolle, J.J., and M.D. Max. 2000. Seafloor drilling of the hydrate economic zone for exploration and production of methane. Tempress Technologies. http://ttinc10.qwestoffice.net/papers/hydratedrill.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2016.
  27. Kruusmaa, M., and T. Salumäe. 2016. U-CAT for underwater archeology. Sea Technology 57(4): 37–38, 40.Google Scholar
  28. Max, M.D., and R.E. Pellenbarg. 2000. Inflatable, non-collapsible, personal flotation device. United States Patent (No. 6,066,017), 23 May 2000.Google Scholar
  29. Max, M.D., and A.H. Johnson. 2011. Methane hydrate/clathrate conversion. In: Advances in clean hydrocarbon fuel processing: Science and technology, ed. M.R. Khan, 413–434. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy No. 19. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Max, M.D., and A.H. Johnson. 2013. Natural gas hydrate (NGH) arctic ocean potential prospects and resource base. OTC Paper 23798. In (Digital) Proceedings arctic technology conference, Houston, Texas, USA, 3–5 Dec 2012, 11pp.Google Scholar
  31. Max, M.D., A.H. Johnson, and W.P. Dillon. 2013. Natural gas hydrate arctic ocean deepwater resource potential. Springer Briefs in Energy, 113 pp.Google Scholar
  32. MD. 2016. Positive displacement motors (PDM). Micron Downhole Tools. http://micon-drilling.de/Download/Catalog_PDM_EN.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2015.
  33. Milne, G. 2012. Deep water installation of steel catenary Risers (Subsea Asia) Presentation 3 October 2012 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 3 pp. http://www.subseauk.com/documents/presentations/installation%20of%20scrs%20subsea%20asia%203rd%20oct%202012.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2015.
  34. Moyano, B., E.H. Jensen, and T.A. Johansen. 2011. Improved quantitative calibration of rock physics models. Petroleum Geoscience 17: 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nagarajan, N.R., M.M. Honarpour, and K. Sampath. 2007. Reservoir-fluid sampling and characterization—Key to efficient reservoir management. Journal of Petroleum Technology (SPE): 80–92.Google Scholar
  36. Offshore 10/5/15. 2015. Centrica gets go-ahead for North Sea coiled tubing shallow borehole. Offshore Magazine. http://www.offshore-mag.com/articles/2015/10/centrica-gets-go-ahead-for-north-sea-coiled-tubing-shallow-borehole.html. Accessed 6 Oct 2015.
  37. Offshore 10/26/15. 2015. Island vessel completes Butch shallow gas investigations. http://www.offshore-mag.com/articles/2015/10/island-vessel-completes-butch-shallow-gas-investigations.html. Accessed 23 Nov 2015.
  38. Offshore 10/29/15. 2016. FMC, Shell introduce new hydraulic tubing connector system. Offshore Magazine. http://www.offshore-mag.com/articles/2015/10/fmc-shell-introduce-new-hydraulic-tubing-connector-system.html. 30 Mar 2016.
  39. Offshore 4/19/16. 2016. Statoil launches new subsea concept. Offshore Magazine. http://www.offshore-mag.com/articles/2016/04/statoil-launches-new-subsea-concept.html. Accessed 12 May 2016.
  40. OL. 2013. Methane Hydrate Community Workshop Report. Consortium for Ocean Leadership report on meeting June 4–6, Washington, DC, 40 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Schlumberger. 2012. Horizontal drilling. http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/search.cfm.
  42. Schlumberger. 2016. TD direct casing-drilling and liner-drilling technology. Accessed 29 Feb 2016.Google Scholar
  43. Schoderbek, D., H. Farrell, K. Hester, J. Howard, K. Raterman, S. Silpngarmlert, K.L. Martin, B. Smith, and P. Klein. 2013. ConocoPhillips Gas Hydrate Production Test Final Technical Report for DOE Award No.: DE-NT0006553, 204 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Small, A. 2016. Decommissioning subsea structures, moorings requires geotechnical considerations. Offshore Magazine, vol. 76(3), 3536. http://www.offshore-mag.com/articles/print/volume-76/issue-3/engineering-construction-installation/decommissioning-subsea-structures-moorings-requires-geotechnical-considerations.html. Accessed 25 Mar 2016.
  45. Spaziani, A.L., and J. Lucas-Head. 2012. Effective communications and geosteering in thin, horizontal targets. Seafloor geohazards related to subsurface fluid migration. Abstracts volume, Operations Geology Workshop 5 Oct 2012, Aberdeen, Scotland, Geological Society of London, 60.Google Scholar
  46. Theimer, K., and J. Kolle. 2007. Microhole high-pressure jet drill for coiled tubing. Final Report TR-117 for US Department of Energy, 51 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Walsh, M.R., S.H. Hancock, S.J. Wilson, S.L. Patil, G.J. Moridis, R. Boswell, T.S. Collett, C.A. Koh, and D. Sloan. 2009. Preliminary report on the commercial viability of gas production from natural gas hydrates. Energy Economics 31: 815–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Watson, J. 2016. Shell Nigeria saves $1M in digital oilfield infrastructure costs with IoT solutions powered by Ingenu and KONČAR. PennEnergy 5/10/16. http://www.pennenergy.com/articles/pennenergy/2016/05/shell-nigeria-saves-1m-in-digital-oilfield-infrastructure-costs-with-iot-solutions-powered-by-ingenu-and-kon-ar.html?cmpid=EnlDailyPetroMay102016&eid=288179069&bid=1399855. Accessed 14 May 2016.
  49. Weatherford. 2001. Whipstocks and whipstock mills. Weatherford drilling and intervention services. http://www.weatherford.com/en/products-services/well-construction/re-entry-services/cased-hole-systems. Accessed 26 Apr 2016.
  50. Whitley, E., and S. Clarke. 2015. High-performance inertial microelectromechanical system. Sea Technology 56(12): 21–25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hydrate Energy International LLCKennerUSA

Personalised recommendations