Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainability Innovation: Experiences in the Jewellery Business

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovating in Practice

Abstract

The chapter aims to study engagement as the basis for innovative projects that respond to an objective of social and environmental sustainability and describes the multi-stakeholder committee as the ideal container for realizing such engagement. The chapter explores the experience of the Ethics Committee of Coloured Gemstones, by Assogemme, in Italy. The goal of the Committee is to define “a procedural code concerning the production and marketing of the coloured gemstones in accordance with the principles of ethical conduct”. The stakeholder engagement approach and the founding of a multi-stakeholder committee for the creation of ethical guidelines are widespread in the jewellery business, which presents many ethical problems: child labour, environmental havoc and social inequality. But the case analysed is the first experience in the coloured gemstone jewellery industry, which is characterized by a plurality of ethical aspects related to the variety of these gemstones. The study of this Committee, which is engaged in the challenge to create a sustainable innovation process, a managerial system for the traceability of jewellery products made with coloured gemstones, underlines opportunities and problems of the stakeholder engagement approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gold, cassiterite, wolframite and coltan are conflict minerals, minerals mined in conditions of armed conflict and human rights abuses, and are regulated by the US Conflict Minerals law.

References

  • Abramovsky, L., Kremp, E., López, A., Schmidt, T., & Simpson, H. (2009). Understanding co-operative R&D activity: Evidence from four European countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18, 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmmed, M. H., & Mohammad, A. (2005). The cost and management. Corporate Governance: Bangladesh Perspective, 33(6), 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G. (2000). The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 317–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albareda, L., Ysa, T., & Lozano, J. M. (2004, October 22–23). The role of public policies in promoting CSR: A comparison among the EU-15. In proceedings of Interdisciplinary CSR Research Conference, ICCSR. University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, M., & Skjoett-Larsen, T. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoldi, F., Cerrato, D., & Todisco, A. (2008). La responsabilità sociale delle PMI distrettuali’. In M. Molteni & A. Todisco (Eds.), Responsabilità sociale d’impresa (pp. 115–142). Milano: Guida del Sole 24 Ore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atallah, G. (2002). Vertical R&D spillovers, cooperation, market structure, and innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(3), 179–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayona, C., Garcia-Marco, T., & Huerta, E. (2001). Firms’ motivations for cooperative R&D: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy, 30(8), 1289–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—Evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokskin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2003, March 14–15). The determinants of R&D cooperation: Evidence from Dutch CIS Data 1996–1998. In Proceedings of ZEW Workshop on the Empirical Economics of Innovation and Patenting, Mannheim, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2007). Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances. Research Policy, 36(7), 930–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caroli, M., & Tantaldo, C. (2011). (a cura di). Le Reti d’Imprese come strumento privilegiato per la diffusione di una Sostenibilità di Sistema, Luiss Business School, 2011. Accessed February 2015, from http://www.pcnitalia.it

  • Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. M. (2002). Logistics social responsibility: An integrative framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 23(1), 145–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. M. (2004). The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 145–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. (2005). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesaretti, G., & Azzurra, A. (Eds.). (2011). Strategie e strumenti per la valorizzazione sostenibile delle produzioni agroalimentari di qualità. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. (2004). The art of the possible: Relationship management in power regimes and supply chains. Supply Chain Management, 9(5), 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Chiara, A. (2012). La competitività responsabile nelle PMI: Strategia vincente nei territori “nemici”. Rivista Piccola Impresa/Small Business, 1, 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Chiara, A. (2013). Commercio etico dei diamanti: Iniziative normative o autoregolamentazione in un’ottica di network? Micro and Macro Marketing, 3, 521–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Chiara, A., & Russo-Spena, T. (2011). CSR strategy in multinational firms: Focus on human resources, suppliers and community. Journal of Global Responsibility, 2, 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freel, M., & Harrison, R. (2006). Innovation and cooperation in the small firm sector: Evidence from ‘Northern Britain’. Regional Studies, 40(4), 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30(2), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasbergen, P. (2010). Global action networks: Agents for collective action. Global Environmental Change, 20(1), 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 315–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnership: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31(4), 477–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., Albert, N. L., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 567–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmati, M. (Ed.). (2002). Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability. London: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnert, S. (2001). An evolutionary theory of collective action: Schumpeterian entrepreneurship for the common good. Constitutional Political Economy, 12, 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, A. (2008). Determinants of R&D cooperation: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(1), 113–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., Hillebrand, B., & McAlister, D. (2002). Managing socially responsible buying: How to integrate non‐economic criteria into the purchasing process. European Management Journal, 20(6), 641–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, X. (1996). Las transformaciones del sector público en las sociedades avanzadas. Del estado del bienestar al estado relacional’ (Papers de Formació No. 23). Diputació de Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midttun, A. (2005). Realigning business, government and civil society: Emerging embedded relational governance beyond the (Neo)Liberal and welfare state models. Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society, 5(3), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Cooperative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molteni, M., Pedrini, M., & Bertolini, S. (Eds.). (2006). La responsabilità sociale d’impresa nelle aziende familiari italiane. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. E., & Poist, R. F. (2002). Social responsible logistics: An exploratory study. Transportation Journal, 41(4), 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noland, J., & Philliphs, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2004). Principles of corporate governance. Accessed May 5, 2007, from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/18/31557724

  • OECD. (2011, May 4). First meeting of the OECD-hosted working group on gold. Summary report. http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investmentfordevelopment/48582867.pdf

  • Piciocchi, P., Vollero, A., & Palazzo, M. (2009). Towards the integration between corporate community relations and CSR communication strategies. The Enel Case Study. Esperienze d’impresa, 2, 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piga, C., & Vivarelli, M. (2004). Internal and external R&D: A sample selection approach. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(4), 457–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo-Spena, T., & De Chiara, A. (2012). CSR, Innovation strategy and supply chain management: Toward an integrated perspective. International Journal of Technology Management, 58, 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacconi, L. (2007). A social contract account for CSR as an Extended Model of corporate governance (II): Compliance, reputation, and reciprocity. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. (2007). R&D Alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 364–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, D. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Wisse, B. (2010). The role of regulatory fit in visionary leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, A. C., & Laberge, M. (2005). Convening stakeholder networks. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 19(Autumn), 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tether, B. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teuscher, P., Grüninger, B., & Ferdinand, N. (2006). Risk management in Sustainable Supply Chain (SSCM): Lessons learnt from the case of GMO-free soybeans. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2006). United Nations Department of Public Information. Conflict Diamonds. Accessed online December 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unicri. (2013). Coloured gemstones. Accessed March 2014, from http://www.viji.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Coloured-gemstones-presentation-UNICRI.pdf

  • van Tulder, R., van Wijk, J., & Kolk, A. (2009). From chain liability to chain responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Suppl. 2), 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vurro, C., Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2009). Shaping sustainable value chains: Network determinants of supply chain governance models. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(Suppl. 4), 607–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, S. (2007). Realising global change: Developing the tools: Building the infrastructure. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 26, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Fesenmaie, D. R. (2007). Collaborative destination marketing: A case study of Elkhart country. Indiana Tourism Management, 28, 863–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S. (2006). The logic of collaborative governance: Corporate responsibility, accountability, and social contract (Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Working Paper No. 17). Cambridge: School of Government, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucchella, A. (2007). La responsabilità sociale nelle reti d’impresa. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 2, 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A heartfelt thanks to Dr. Luisa La Via, chairman of the Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Naples “L’Orientale”, Naples, Italy

    Alessandra De Chiara

Authors
  1. Alessandra De Chiara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra De Chiara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

    Tiziana Russo-Spena

  2. University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

    Cristina Mele

  3. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, VTT, Finland

    Maaria Nuutinen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Chiara, A. (2017). Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainability Innovation: Experiences in the Jewellery Business. In: Russo-Spena, T., Mele, C., Nuutinen, M. (eds) Innovating in Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43380-6_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation