Advertisement

Genealogical Exercises

  • Lorenzo Bernini
Chapter
  • 407 Downloads

Abstract

From the nineteenth century, in English, “queer” is used as a pejorative epithet against homosexual men. It comes from the German “quer,” which, in turn, is derived from the Latin verb “torquere,” meaning “transverse,” “diagonal” or “slanting.” “Queer” is thus the opposite of “straight” and—since heterosexuality is traditionally associated with moral rectitude—“heterosexual.” It can literally be translated into Italian as “storto” [“crooked”], “strano” [“strange”], “bizzarro” [“bizarre”], but semantically, queer is equivalent to “checca” [“fairy”] or “frocio” [“faggot”]. Different genealogies of queer theories are possible that pass through the histories of slavery, racial violence and critical race studies (Frantz Fanon, Sylvia Wynter, Hortense Spillers), but in the academic sphere, the first one to be generally credited with putting the adjective “queer” next to the noun “theory” is Teresa de Lauretis (1991), who in February of 1990 held a conference at the University of Santa Cruz (California) entitled “Queer Theory: Lesbian and Gay Sexualities.” The expression “queer theory” does not appear instead in the two books published that same year which are often considered the inaugural texts of queer philosophy and queer cultural studies, respectively: Gender Trouble by Judith Butler and Epistemology of the Closet by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick. In order to find the philosophical origins of these American academic queer theories, however, one must go even further back in time, to at least 1976, when The Will to Knowledge, the first volume of Michel Foucault’s History of Sexuality, was published in France. It served in fact as a fundamental reference for de Lauretis, Butler, Kosofsky Sedgwick and all the scholars that followed and continued to develop critical scholarship about sexuality.

Keywords

Sexual Minority Sexual Identity Queer Theory Sexual Revolution Pleasure Principle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bernini, Lorenzo. 2010b. La macelleria del Leviatano: Come nutrirsi delle carni di un mito. In La sovranità scomposta: Sull’attualità del Leviatano, ed. Lorenzo Bernini, Mauro Farnesi Camellone, and Nicola Marcucci. Milan, Udine: Mimesis.Google Scholar
  2. Bersani, Leo. 1986. The Freudian Body: Psychoanalysis and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1987. Is the Rectum a Grave? October, 43: 197–222. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3397574.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1990. The Culture of Redemption: Marcel Proust and Melanie Klein. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 1996. Homos. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bersani, Leo, and Adam Phillips. 2008. Intimacies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, Judith.1993. Bodies that Matter. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Califia, Patrick, and Robin Sweeney (ed). 1996. The Second Coming: A Leatherdyke Reader. New York: Alyson Publication.Google Scholar
  9. Cavarero, Adriana. [2007] 2011. Horrorism: Naming Contemporary Violence. Trans. William McCuaig. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2008. Inclinazione materna. In Di un altro genere: Etica al femminile, ed. Paula Ricci Sindoni, and Carmelo Vigna. Milan: Vita e pensiero.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2011. Inclining the Subject: Ethics, Alternity and Natality. In Theory After ‘Theory, ed. Jane Elliot, and Dereck Attridge. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2014. Inclinazioni. Milan: Raffaello Cortina Editore.Google Scholar
  13. De Lauretis, Teresa. 1991. Queer Theory: Lesbian and Gay Sexualities: An Introduction. Differences 3(2).Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1999a. Soggetti eccentrici. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1999b. La nemesi di Freud: Per un’archeologia degli studi su genere, sessualità e cultura. In Soggeti eccentrici. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2010. Freud’s Drive: Psychoanalysis, Literature and Film. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. “Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. [1972] 2000. Anti-Oedipus. New York: Viking Press.”Google Scholar
  18. Dworkin, Andrea. 1987. Intercourse. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Edelman, Lee. 2004. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foucault, Michel. 1982b. Afterword by Michel Foucault: The Subject and Power (Why Study Power: The Question of the Subject and How Power is Exercised?). In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Freud, Sigmund. [1920] 1990. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  22. _____. [1905] 2011. Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. Connecticut: Martino Fine Books.Google Scholar
  23. _____. [1929] 1961. Civilization and its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  24. Kerr, John. 1994. A Most Dangerous Method: The Story of Jung, Freud and Sabina Spielrein. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  25. LaPlanche, Jean. [1992b] 1999. Masochism and the General Theory of Seduction. In Essays on Otherness. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. _____. 1992c. Psychoanalysis, Time and Translation. In Jean Laplanche: Seduction Translation and the Drives, ed. John Fletcher, and Martin Stonton. London: Institute of Contemporary Arts.Google Scholar
  27. _____. [1992a] 1999. The Unfinished Copernican Revolution. In Essays on Otherness. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. MacKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Marcuse, Herbert. 1955. Eros and Civilisation. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  30. Pustianaz, Marco. 2004. Lo spazio dell’inversione. In Maschilità decadenti: La lunga fin de siècle. Bergamo: Sestante.Google Scholar
  31. Spielrein, Sabina. 1912. Die Destruktion als Ursache des Werdens. In Jahrbuch für psychoanalytische und psychopathologische Forschungen, 4.Google Scholar
  32. Warner, Michael (ed). 1993. Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  33. Watney, Simon. 1987. Policing Desire: Pornography, AIDS, and the Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  34. Westphal, Karl Friedrich. 1870. Die Konträre Sexualempfindung. In Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Bernini
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations