Abstract
The Andean region is one of the most interesting places where Participatory Budgeting was diffused. This chapter takes into account the adoption of Participatory Budgeting in two countries: Ecuador and Peru. It presents how the device was transferred to small cities such as Cotacachi and Villa El Salvador, analysing agents and dynamics. Both cases became important experiences that influenced the creation of national laws on Participatory Budgeting.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ampuero, N. P. (1997). Gobierno local, cidadania e izquierda en Lima Metropolitana: Independencia y Villa El Salvador. In C. R. Balbi (Ed.), Lima: aspiraciones, reconoscimiento y cidadania en los noventa (pp. 135–164). Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
Bocanegra, V. A. M. (2009). A Política urbana em bairros populares no Peru: limites e desafios para o desenvolvimento e a inclusão social. Dissertação de mestrado. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Planejamento Urbano e Regional. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, p. 188.
Burt, J. M. (1999). Sendero luminoso y la “batalla decisiva” en las barriadas de Lima: el caso de Villa El Salvador. In J. Steve (Ed.), Los senderos insólitos del Perú: guerra y sociedade, 1980–1985 (pp. 263–300). Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
Echegaray, G. C., & Marulanda, L. (2001). Desarrollo Local con Gestión Participativa. Presupuesto Participativo Villa El Salvador, Perú. HIS Simpa Papers, No. 09, Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies.
Equador. (2008). Constituición de 2008. República do Equador.
Equador. (2010). Ley Orgánica de Participación Ciudadana. República do Equador.
Foro. (2002). Ciudades para la vida: la agenda 21 en marcha. No. 7. Lima, pp. 1–10.
Hordjik, M. (2002). Participatory Budgeting in Villa El Salvador. PLA Notes, 44 (Special Issue No. 3), 12–15.
Hordjik, M. (2005, April). Participatory Governance in Peru: Exercising Citizenship. Participatory Governance. Environment & Urbanization, 17(1), 219–236.
Hordjik, M. (2009). Peru’s Participatory Budgeting: Configurations of Power, Opportunities for Change. The Open Urban Studies Journal (2), 43–55.
McNulty, S. (2012). An Unlikely Success: Peru’s Top-Down Participatory Budgeting Experience. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2), 1–19.
Meyers, R. (2005). Cotacachi – Presupuesto Participativo: Manual. Quito: Argudo & Asociados.
Ortiz, S. O. (2004). Cotacachi: una apuesta por la democracia participativa. Flasco: Quito.
Programa de Gestão Urbana. (2001). I Seminário Internacional sobre o Orçamento Participativo. Quito, s/p.
Propuesta Ciudadana. (2004). Documento de trabajo N. 3: Marco Legal del Presupuesto Participativo. Documento eletrônico, s/p.
Villa El Salvador. (2002). Plan Integral de Desarrollo al 2010: Presupuesto Participativo 200-2002. Villa El Salvador, 28 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Porto de Oliveira, O. (2017). Mosaics of Participation: Participatory Budgeting in Andean America and Transfers on a National Scale. In: International Policy Diffusion and Participatory Budgeting. Urban Politics in a Global Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43337-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43337-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43336-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43337-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)