Abstract
Humans are increasingly becoming urbanized. Because a number of bird species readily live in urban areas and birds are relatively easily observed, birds are becoming the largest everyday encounter with wild fauna people will have, globally. Despite, few studies have been made on how visual (or acoustic) bird encounter affects humans. The few existing studies show that birds provide humans with increased self-evaluated well-being when seeing and hearing them. These values provided by birds can be recognized as a cultural ecosystems service.
Here we review extant literature to consider why certain species fascinate humans more than others, and some can increase well-being and provide ecosystem services, while others offer disservices through unappealing characteristics. We particularly highlight indications of links between species diversity and well-being. Finally, we discuss possible reasons for variations in our responses to birds and birdsong associated with age, gender, childhood, contact with nature, and the biophilia theory.
If interaction with birds truly increases quality of life, then this value should be considered in the planning of sustainable cities. Both conservation and proper management of existing urban green areas are needed to increase possibilities to encounter many bird species.
Keywords
- Biodiversity
- Green space
- Passerines
- Songbirds
- Urban soundscape
- Urban woodland
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alcock I, White MP, Wheeler BW, Fleming LE, Depledge MH (2014) Longitudinal effects on mental health of moving to greener and less green urban areas. Environ Sci Technol 48:1247–1255
Annerstedt M, Jönsson P, Wallergård M, Johansson G, Karlson B, Grahn P, Hansen ÅM, Währborg P (2013) Inducing physiological stress recovery with sounds of nature in a virtual reality forest—Results from a pilot study. Physiol Behav 118:240–250
Balter M (2010) Evolution of language, animal communication helps reveal roots of language. Science 328:969–971
Belaire A, Westphal LM, Whelan CJ, Minor ES (2015) Urban residents’ perceptions of birds in the neighborhood: biodiversity, cultural ecosystem services, and disservices. Condor 117:192–202
Benfield JA, Bell PA, Troup LJ, Soderstrom NC (2010) Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment. J Environ Psychol 30:103–111
Bjerke T, Østdahl T (2004) Animal-related attitudes and activities in an urban population. Anthrozoös 17:2
Björk EA (1985) The perceived quality of natural sounds. Acustica 57:185–188
Björk J, Albin M, Grahn P, Jacobsson H, Ardö J, Wadbro J, Östergren PO, Skärbäck E (2008) Recreational values of the natural environment in relation to neighbourhood satisfaction, physical activity, obesity and wellbeing. J Epidemiol Community Health 62:1–7
Blair RB (2001) Birds and butterflies along urban gradients in two ecoregions of the U.S. In: Lockwood JL, McKinney ML (eds) Biotic homogenization. Norwell (MA): Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, pp 33–56
Bolhuis JJ, Okanoya K, Scharff C (2010) Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech. Nat Rev 11:747–759
Brown TL, Dawson CP, Miller RL (1979) Interests and attitudes of metropolitan New York residents about wildlife. Trans N Am Wildl Nat Resour Conf 44:289–297
Clergeau P, Mennechez G, Sauvage A, Lemoine A (2001) Human perception and appreciation of birds: a motivation for wildlife conservation in urban environments of France. In: Marzluff M, Bowman R, Donelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Boston
Clucas B, Marzluff JM (2014) Attitude and actions toward birds in urban areas; human cultural differences influence bird behavior. Auk 129(1):8–16
Clucas B, Rabotyagov S, Marzluff JM (2014) How much is that birdie in my backyard? A cross-continental economic valuation of native urban songbirds. Urban Ecosyst 18:251–266
Cocker M, Tipling D (eds) (2013) Birds and people. Jonathan Cape, London
Cohen DA, McKenzie TL, Sehgal A, Williamson S, Golinelli D, Lurie N (2007) Contribution of public parks to physical activity. Am J Public Health 97(3):509–514
Coluccy JM, Drobney RD, Graber DA, Sheriff SL, Witter DJ (2001) Attitudes of central Missouri residents toward local giant Canada geese and management alternatives. Wildl Soc Bull 29:116–123
Cooper CB, Smith JA (2010) Gender patterns in bird-related recreation in the USA and UK. Ecol Soc 15(4):4
Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Skinner AMJ, Davies ZG, Rouquette JR, Maltby LL, Warren PH, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ (2012) Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience 62:47–55
Davis AY, Belaire A, Fafran MA, Milz D, Sweeney ER, Loss SR, Minor ES (2012) Green infrastructure and bird diversity across an urban socioeconomic gradient. Ecosphere 3:11
Dawson CP, Miller RL, Brown TL (1978) Human attitudes toward urban wildlife. Trans Northeast Sect Wildl Soc 35:143–153
Earp SE, Maney DL (2012) Birdsong: Is it music to their ears? Front Evol Neurosci 4:1–10
Fivush R, Bohanek JG, Zaman W, Grapin S (2012) Gender differences in adolescents’ autobiographical narratives. J Cogn Dev 13:295–319
Fredrickson LM, Anderson DH (1999) A qualitative exploration of the wilderness experience as a source of spiritual inspiration. J Environ Psychol 19:21–39
Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of green space increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3:390–394
Fuller RA, Katherine NI, Davies ZG, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ (2012) Interactions between people and birds in urban landscapes. In: Lepczyk CA, Warren PA (eds) Urban bird ecology and conservation. Studies in avian biology (no. 45). University of California Press, Berkley, CA, pp 249–266
Giusti M, Barthel S, Marcus L (2014) Nature routines and affinity with the biosphere: a case study of preschool children in Stockholm. Child Youth Environ 24:3
Grahn P, Stigsdotter U (2003) Landscape planning and stress. Urban For Urban Green 2:1–18
Halfwerk W, Bot S, Buikx J, van der Velde M, Komdeur J, ten Cate C, Slabbekoorn H (2011) Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:14549–14554
Hartig T, Mang M, Evans G (1991) Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environ Behav 23:3–26
Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries S, Frumkin H (2014) Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health 35:207–228
Hedblom M, Söderström B (2010) Importance of urban and peri-urban woodlands for the avi-fauna in urban forest fragments: an analysis of 34 Swedish cities. J Biogeogr 37:1302–1316
Hedblom M, Heyman E, Antonsson H, Gunnarsson B (2014) Birdsong diversity influences people’s appreciation of urban landscapes. Urban For Urban Green 13(3):469–474
Heyman E (2010) Clearance of understory in urban woodlands: assessing impact on bird abundance and diversity. For Ecol Manag 260:125–131
Heyman E, Gunnarsson B, Dovydavicius L (2016) Management of urban nature and its impact on bird ecosystem services. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M (eds) Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 465–490
Hough RL (2014) Biodiversity and human health: evidence for causality? Biodiver Conserv 23:267–288
Jackson C (1993) Doing what comes naturally? Women and environment in development. World Dev 21:1947–1963
Jerzak L (2001) Suburbanization of the magpie in the Palearctic. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Boston, MA, pp 503–425
Johns-Laird PN, Oatley K (2010) Emotions, music, and literature. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Feldman Barret L (eds) Handbook of emotions. Guilford, New York City, NY, pp 102–113
Kaczynski AT, Potwarka LR, Smale BJA, Havitz ME (2009) Association of parkland proximity with neighborhood and park-based physical activity: variations by gender and age. Leis Sci 31(2):174–191
Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol 16:169–182
Keniger LE, Gaston KJ, Irvine KN, Fuller RA (2013) What are the benefits of interacting with nature? Int J Environ Res Public Health 10:913–935
Kjellgren A, Buhrkall H (2010) A comparison of the restorative effect of a natural environment with that of a simulated natural environment. J Environ Psychol 30:464–472
Knez I (2006) Autobiographical memories for places. Memory 14:359–377
Knez I (2014a) Affective and cognitive reactions to subliminal flicker from fluorescent lighting. Conscious Cogn 26:97–104
Knez I (2014b) Place and the self: An autobiographical memory synthesis. Philos Psychol 2:164–192
Knez I, Kers C (2000) Effects of indoor lighting, gender and age on mood and cognitive performance. Environ Behav 6:817–831
Knez I, Thorsson S, Eliasson I (2013) Climate change: concerns, beliefs, and emotions in residents, experts, decision makers, tourists, and tourist industry. Am J Clim Chang 2:254–269
Krause B (2014) The great animal orchestra. Finding the origins of music in the world’s wild places. Profile Books, London
Lepczyk AC, Warren PS, Machabée L, Kinzig AP, Mertig AG (2012) Who feeds the birds? A comparison across regions. In: Lepczyk AC, Warren PS (eds) Urban bird ecology and conservation. Studies in avian biology, no 45. The Cooper Ornithological Society. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
Lepczyk CA, La Sorte F, Aronson M, Goddard M, MacGregor-Fors I, Nilon C, Warren P (2016) Global patterns and drivers of urban birds. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M (eds) Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 13–34
Luck GW, Davidson P, Boxall D, Smallbone L (2011) Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well-being and connection to nature. Conserv Biol 25:816–826
Magai C (2001) Emotions over the lifespan. In: Birren JE, Schai KW (eds) Handbook of the psychology of aging. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 310–344
Marler P (2000) Origins of music and speech: insights from animals. In: Wallin NL, Merker B, Brown S (eds) The origins of music. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p 41
Marzluff JM (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Boston, MA, p 19–47
McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890
Melles SJ (2005) Urban bird diversity as an indicator of human social diversity and economic inequality in Vancouver, British Columbia. Urban Habitats 3:1
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20:8
Mitchell R, Popham F (2008) Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet 372:1655–1660
Myer FS, Franz CM (2004) The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J Environ Psychol 24:503–515
Payne SR (2013) The production of a perceived restorativeness soundscape scale. Appl Acoust 74:255–263
Plambech T, Konijnendijk van den Bosch CC (2015) The impact of nature on creativity – a study among Danish creative professionals. Urban For Urban Green 14:255–263
Randler C (2008) Risk assessment by crow phenotype in a hybrid zone. J Ethol 26:309–316
Ratcliffe E (2015) Restorative perceptions and outcomes associated with listening to birds. Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Psychology Faculty of Arts and Human Sciences, University of Surrey
Ratcliffe E, Gatersleben B, Sowden PT (2013) Bird sounds and their contributions to perceived attention restoration and stress recovery. J Environ Psychol 36:221–228
Sander HA, Zhao C (2015) Urban green and blue: Who values what and where? Land Use Policy 42:194–209
Sanga I (2006) Kumpolo: aesthetic appreciation and cultural appropriation of bird sounds in Tanzania. Folklore 117:97–102
Schipperijn J, Ekholm O, Stigsdotter UK, Toftager M, Bentsen P, Kamper-Jørgensen F, Randrup TB (2010) Factors influencing the use of green space: results from a Danish national representative survey. Landsc Urban Plan 95:130–137
Shochat E (2004) Credit or debit? Resource input changes population dynamics of city-slicker birds. Oikos 106:622–626
Shwartz A, Turbé A, Simon L, Julliard R (2014) Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers: an experiment. Biol Conserv 171:82–90
Tamosiunas A, Grazuleviciene R, Luksiene D, Dedele A, Reklaitiene R, Baceviciene M, Vencloviene J, Bernotiene G, Radisauskas R, Malinauskiene V et al (2014) Accessibility and use of urban green spaces, and cardiovascular health: findings from a Kaunas cohort study. Environ Health 13:20. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-13-20
Thompson CW, Aspinall P, Montarzino A (2008) The childhood factor. Adult visits to green places and the significance of childhood experience. Environ Behav 40:111–143
Thorpe WH (1961) Birdsong: the biology of vocal communication and expression in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Timmers M, Fischer AH, Manstead ASR (2003) Ability versus vulnerability: beliefs about men’s and women’s emotional behavior. Cognit Emot 17:41–63
Tyrväinen L, Mäkinen K, Schipperijn J (2007) Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landsc Urban Plan 79(1):5–19
Tyrväinen L, Ojala A, Korpela K, Tsunetsugu Y, Kawaga T, Lanki T (2014) The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: a field experiment. J Environ Psychol 38:1–9
U.S. Department of the Interior (2011) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation, Washington
Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 11:201–230
UN 2014. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352)
Valcarcel A, Fernández-Juricic E (2009) Antipredator strategies of house finches: Are urban habitats safe spots from predators even when humans are around? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:637–685
Viollon S, Lavandier C, Drake C (2002) Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban Environment. Appl Acoust 63:493–511
Wallin NL, Merker B, Brown S (2000) The origins of music. The MIT press, Cambridge, MA
Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. ISBN 0-674-07442-4
Zhang W, Goodale E, Chen J (2014) How contact with nature affects children’s biophilia, biophobia and conservation attitude in China. Biol Conserv 177:109–116
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Debora Arlt and Matthew Hiron from the Department of Ecology at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences for their valuable comments regarding the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hedblom, M., Knez, I., Gunnarsson, B. (2017). Bird Diversity Improves the Well-Being of City Residents. In: Murgui, E., Hedblom, M. (eds) Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43312-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43314-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)