How to Implement a Fracture Liaison Service
- 860 Downloads
The case for Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) for the prevention of secondary fractures is clear. With an ageing population, the burden of osteoporosis is set to increase. Despite evidence for the clinical effectiveness of secondary fracture prevention, translation in the real world setting remains disappointing: worldwide, eighty per cent of fragility fracture patients are neither assessed nor treated for osteoporosis or falls risk, with the aim of reducing future fracture incidence. If implemented, a wide variety of service models are used to deliver effective secondary fracture prevention. To support and promote the use of effective models of care across the globe, the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) launched the Capture the Fracture® (CTF) programme in 2013. This expert-led and evidence-based programme aims to reduce secondary fractures by facilitating the implementation of FLS on a global level. A primary resource developed by CTF is the Best Practice Framework (BPF), which sets standards for FLS, serves as a benchmark for existing FLS and serves as a guidance tool for developing FLS. In an effort to engage the global medical community, CTF offers a Best Practice Recognition programme where FLS can submit their service to IOF for evaluation against the BPF for a gold, silver or bronze star in recognition of achievements. The FLS is then included in the showcase of best practice and plotted on the CTF Map of Best Practice that displays participating FLS and their respective achievement level. To influence change, the map can be used as a visual representation of FLS available worldwide, their achievements, as well as the areas for opportunity and development in secondary fracture prevention.
KeywordsVertebral Fracture Fragility Fracture Vertebral Fracture Assessment Secondary Fracture Fracture Liaison Service
The authors would like to thank all the FLS applicants for taking part of the CTF programme.
- 5.Hernlund E et al (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8:136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ (2012) Capture the fracture a global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. World Osteoporosis Day Report 2012. The report is available online: https://www.iofbonehealth.org/capture-fracture-report-2012.
- 9.Cooper C et al (2012) Long-term treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a review from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF). Curr Med Res Opin 28(3):475–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures--an “OPTIMAL” model of care from Singapore. Chandran M, Tan MZ, Cheen M, Tan SB, Leong M, Lau TC. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(11):2809–17. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2368-8. Epub 2013 Apr 25. PMID: 23615816
- 20.Australia /New Zealand:http://osteoporosis.org.nz/, Canada:http://www.osteoporosis.ca/fls/utm_source=Home+Page&utm_medium=Menu+Button&utm_campaign=FLS, UK:https://www.nos.org.uk/fls-resources, Singapore: PMID:23615816, USA: PMID: 24014197
- 21.Ensrud KE, Schousboe JT (2011) Clinical practice. Vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 364(17):1634–1642Google Scholar
- 35.Burch J et al (2014) Systematic review of the use of bone turnover markers for monitoring the response to osteoporosis treatment: the secondary prevention of fractures, and primary prevention of fractures in high-risk groups. Health Technol Assess 18(11):1–180CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar