Advertisement

The Orthogeriatric Approach: Progress Worldwide

  • David R. MarshEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Practical Issues in Geriatrics book series (PIG)

Abstract

The role of geriatricians in the rehabilitation phase after surgical treatment of fragility fractures, particularly hip fractures, has been accepted for many years, although it has not been widespread in the world because there are many countries where the discipline of geriatric medicine is not yet strongly established. However, it is only in the last 10 years that their role in the acute, perioperative phase has begun to be established. This began in the United Kingdom and has spread, particularly in Europe and Australasia, though there have also been a few important centres of development in the USA, Israel and Singapore. There is an exponentially increasing published evidence base suggesting that orthogeriatric co-management can be both better quality and more cost-effective. It is therefore desirable that this format of service delivery, or a variation of it, should become established in the emerging economies, where the expected rise in fragility fracture incidence will be most severe. Two organisations are actively pursuing that goal: the Fragility Fracture Network and AOTrauma.

The UK experience was that continuous, patient-level audit of hip fracture management, with nearly real-time feedback to participants, was a powerful driver of orthogeriatric co-management. That model is being closely followed in Ireland, Australasia and the German-speaking European countries. The Fragility Fracture Network is offering it globally and a pilot in Europe was successful. However, that mechanism has to follow a process of consensus on guidelines and standards that is led by orthopaedics and geriatrics (or its equivalent) but also includes anaesthetists, nurses, physiotherapists, rehabilitationists and osteoporosis specialists. The audit, or an equivalent performance indicator, then measures compliance with those standards and that is one proven driver of positive change. However, the consensus process is the essential first step and is powerful in raising fragility fracture care up the policy agenda.

Keywords

Fragility Fracture Fracture Unit Geriatric Fracture Comprehensive Geriatric Care Orthogeriatric Care 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Irvine RE, Devas MB (1967) The geriatric orthopaedic unit. J Bone Joint Surg 49B:186–187Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Devas M (1976) Geriatric orthopaedics. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 58(1):16–21PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Irvine RE (1982) A geriatric orthopaedic unit. In: Coakley D (ed) Establishing a geriatric service. Croom Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sainsbury R (1991) Hip fracture. Rev Clin Gerontol 1(1):67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parker MJ, Todd CJ, Palmer CR et al (1998) Inter-hospital variations in length of hospital stay following hip fracture. Age Ageing 27(3):333–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cameron I, Crotty M, Currie C et al (2000) Geriatric rehabilitation following fractures in older people: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 4(2):i–ivPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Wright RJ, Resnick NM (2001) Reducing delirium after hip fracture: a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 49(5):516–522CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Congresso Nazionale AITOG (2016) La fragilità scheletrica nell’anziano: approccio multidisciplinare [Online]. Available: http://www.igea.it/sites/default/files/news_events_press/files_allegati/congressoaitogprogrammamilano20-21maggio2016-igea.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2016
  9. 9.
    Pioli G, Giusti A, Barone A (2008) Orthogeriatric care for the elderly with hip fractures: where are we? Aging Clin Exp Res 20:113–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giusti A, Barone A, Razzano M, Pizzonia M, Pioli G (2011) Optimal setting and care organization in the management of older adults with hip fracture. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 47:281–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pioli G, GIOG et al (2014) The management of hip fracture in the older population. Joint position statement by Gruppo Italiano Ortogeriatria (GIOG). Aging Clin Exp Res 26(5):547–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pioli G, Pellicciotti F, Davoli ML, Pignedoli P, Sabetta E, Ferrari A (2010) Hip fracture management and outcomes in Italy. Eur Geriatr Med 1:104–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fornia S, Pierallib F, Alessandro Sergia A et al (2016) Mortality after hip fracture in the elderly: the role of a multidisciplinary approach and time to surgery in a retrospective observational study on 23,973 patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 66:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Álvarez-Nebreda ML, Vidán MT, Serra JA (2010) Hip fracture management and outcomes in Spain. Eur Geriatr Med 1:108–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vidán M, Serra JA, Moreno C, Riquelme G, Ortiz J (2005) Efficacy of a comprehensive geriatric intervention in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:1476–1482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    González-Montalvo JI, Teresa Alarcón T, Mauleón JL, Gil-Garay E, Gotor P, Martín-Vega A (2010) The orthogeriatric unit for acute patients: a new model of care that improves efficiency in the management of patients with hip fracture. Hip Int 20(2):229–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kammerlander C, Gosch M, Blauth M, Lechleitner M, Luger TJ, Roth T (2011) The Tyrolean Geriatric Fracture Center. Z Gerontol Geriatr 44:363–367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kammerlander C, Roth T, Friedman SM et al (2010) Ortho-geriatric service – a literature review comparing different models. Osteoporos Int 21(Supp 4):S637–S646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Friess T, Hartwig E, Liener U, Sturm J, Hoffmann R (2016) Alterstraumazentren von der Idee bis zur Umsetzung. Was wurde erreicht? Unfallchirurg 119:7–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Watne LO, Torbergsen AC, Conroy S et al (2014) The effect of a pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric service on cognitive function in patients with hip fracture: randomized controlled trial (Oslo Orthogeriatric Trial). BMC Med 12:63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prestmo A, Hagen G, Sletvold O et al (2015) Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 385:1623–1633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prestmo A, Saltvedt I, Helbostad JL et al (2016) Who benefits from orthogeriatric treatment? Results from the Trondheim hip-fracture trial. BMC Geriatr 16:49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lundstrom M, Olofsson B, Stenvall M et al (2007) Postoperative delirium in old patients with femoral neck fracture: a randomized intervention study. Aging Clin Exp Res 19:178–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stenvall M, Berggren M, Lundström M, Gustafson Y (2012) A multidisciplinary intervention program improved the outcome after hip fracture for people with dementia: subgroup analyses of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 54:e284–e289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stenvall M, Olofsson B, Nyberg L, Lundström M, Gustafson Y (2007) Improved performance in activities of daily living and mobility after a multidisciplinary postoperative rehabilitation in older people with femoral neck fracture: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. J Rehabil Med 39:232–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pedersen SJ, Borgbjerg FM, Schousboe B et al (2008) A comprehensive hip fracture program reduces complication rates and mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc 56(10):1831–1838CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stenqvist C, Madsen CM, Riis T, Jørgensen HL, Duus BR, Lauritzen JB, van der Mark S (2016) Orthogeriatric service reduces mortality in patients with hip fracture. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 7(2):67–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ihmisen terveyden tähden (2014) The Seinäjoki orthogeriatrics symposium 30.10.2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.epshp.fi/files/6765/Symposium_programme_30.10.2014.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2016
  29. 29.
    Mahamdia R et al (2015) [Towards the development of the orthogeriatric care model]. Article in French. Soins Gerontol 114:22–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Deschodt M, Braes T, Broos P et al (2011) Effect of an inpatient geriatric consultation team on functional outcome, mortality, institutionalization, and readmission rate in older adults with hip fracture: a controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 59(7):1299–1308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Deschodt M, Braes T, Flamaing J et al (2012) Preventing delirium in older adults with recent hip fracture through multidisciplinary geriatric consultation. J Am Geriatr Soc 60(4):733–799CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    van den Berg P et al (2015) Meeting international standards of secondary fracture prevention: a survey on Fracture Liaison Services in the Netherlands. Osteoporos Int 26:2257–2263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    den Hartog YM, Mathijssen NMC, Vehmeijer SBW (2013) Reduced length of hospital stay after the introduction of a rapid recovery protocol for primary THA procedures. Acta Orthop 84(5):444–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    F. F. Network (2015) 4th FFN Global Congress – workshop 3–1 [Online]. Available: http://fragilityfracturenetwork.org/cug/resources-und-webinars/4th-ffn-global-congress-2015/. Accessed 18 June 2016
  35. 35.
    Cogan L, Martin AJ, Kelly LA, Duggan J, Hynes D, Power D (2010) An audit of hip fracture services in the Mater Hospital Dublin 2001 compared with 2006. Ir J Med Sci 179:51–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    The National Office of Clinical Audit (NOCA). Irish Hip Fracture Database [Online]. Available: https://www.noca.ie/irish-hip-fracture-database. Accessed 16 June 2016
  37. 37.
    Irish Hip Fracture Database. Irish Hip Fracture Database. National report 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.noca.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/IHFD-National-Report-2014-Online-Version.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2016
  38. 38.
    Henderson CY, Shanahan E, Butler A, Lenehan B, O’Connor M, Lyons D, Ryan JP (2016) Dedicated orthogeriatric service reduces hip fracture mortality. Ir J Med Sci. [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 27059996Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Irish Medical Journal. Dedicated orthogeriatric service saves the HSE a million euro [Online]. Available: http://imj.ie/1964-2/. Accessed 16 June 2016
  40. 40.
    Suhm N, Kaelin R, Studer P et al (2014) Orthogeriatric care pathway: a prospective survey of impact on length of stay, mortality and institutionalisation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:1261–1269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, McCann RM (2008) Geriatric co-management of proximal femur fractures: total quality management and protocol-driven care result in better outcomes for a frail patient population. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:1349–1356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Friedman SM, Mendelson DA (eds) (2014) Fragility fractures. Clin Geriatr Med 30(2):175–394Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    International Geriatric Fracture Society. Homepage [Online]. Available: http://www.geriatricfracture.org/. Accessed 20 June 2016
  44. 44.
    Grigoryan KV, Javedan H, Rudolph JL (2014) Orthogeriatric care models and outcomes in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 28(3):e49–e55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Swart E, Vasudeva E, Makhni EC, Macaulay W, Bozic KJ (2016) Dedicated perioperative hip fracture comanagement programs are cost-effective in high-volume centers: an economic analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(1):222–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    McGilton KS et al (2013) Evaluation of patient-centered rehabilitation model targeting older persons with a hip fracture, including those with cognitive impairment. BMC Geriatr 13:136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    The canadian collaborative study of hip fractures. Evaluating the 48-hour benchmark for surgery [Online]. Available: http://c2e2.ca/research/health-services-and-outcomes-research-program/evaluating-48-hour-benchmark-surgery-canadian. Accessed 20 June 2016
  48. 48.
    Sheehan KJ, Sobolev B, Guy P et al (2016) Constructing an episode of care from acute hospitalization records for studying effects of timing of hip fracture surgery. J Orthop Res 34(2):197–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Garcez-Leme LE, Leme MD, Espino DV (2005) Geriatrics in Brazil: a big country with big opportunities. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(11):2018–2022CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wagner P et al (2012) Comparison of complications and length of hospital stay between orthopedic and orthogeriatric treatment in elderly patients with a hip fracture. Geriatr Orthop Surg 3(2):55–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Suarez S et al (2016) Impact on hip fracture mortality after the establishment of an orthogeriatric care program in a Colombian hospital. J Aging Health. epub before print. doi: 10.1177/0898264316636839
  52. 52.
    Wang H et al (2015) The influence of inpatient comprehensive geriatric care on elderly patients with hip fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(11):19815–19830PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tian M, Gong X, Rath S et al (2016) Management of hip fractures in older people in Beijing: a retrospective audit and comparison with evidence-based guidelines and practice in the UK. Osteoporos Int 27(2):677–681CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chen YT et al (2011) Orthogeriatrics in Taiwan: overview and experiences. J Clin Gerontol Geriatr 2:66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    F. Japan (2016) FFNJ (Fragility Fracture Network Japan) [Online]. Available: http://ffn-japanmeeting2012.kenkyuukai.jp/special/index.asp?id=8238. Accessed 20 June 2016
  56. 56.
    Shigemoto K et al (2015) Effect of ortho-geriatric co-management on hip fractures [Online]. Available: http://fragilityfracturenetwork.org/files/207_1100_shigemoto_vwe_sat_37.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2016
  57. 57.
    Mak J, Wong E, Cameron I (2011) Australian and New Zealand society for geriatric medicine. Position statement – orthogeriatric care. Australas J Ageing 30(3):162–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    NICE (2014) Hip fracture: management. [CG124] [Online]. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg124. Accessed 20 June 2016
  59. 59.
    Close JC (2013) Hip fracture in Australia: missed opportunities and a chance to improve care. Intern Med J 43(12):1262–1264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Chong C et al (2008) Description of an orthopedic–geriatric model of care in Australia with 3 years data. Geriatr Gerontol Int 8:86–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    ANZHFR. Australian & New Zealand hip fracture registry. Homepage [Online]. Available: http://www.hipfracture.org.au/. Accessed 20 June 2016
  62. 62.
    Lynch G, Tower M, Venturato L (2015) Identifying outcomes associated with co-managed care models for patients who have sustained a hip fracture: an integrative literature review. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs 19:140–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Leung AHC et al (2011) An orthogeriatric collaborative intervention program for fragility fractures: a retrospective cohort study. J Trauma 71:1390–1394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Doshi HK et al (2014) Orthogeriatric model for hip fracture patients in Singapore: our early experience and initial outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:351–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Adunsky A et al (2005) Five-year experience with the ‘Sheba’ model of comprehensive orthogeriatric care for elderly hip fracture patients. Disabil Rehabil 27:1123–1127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ginsberg G, Adunsky A, Rasooly I (2013) A cost-utility analysis of a comprehensive orthogeriatric care for hip fracture patients, compared with standard of care treatment. Hip Int 23(6):570–575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gilchrist WJ, Newman RJ, Hamblen DL, Williams BO (1988) Prospective randomised study of an orthopaedic geriatric inpatient service. BMJ 297:1116–1118CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Johansen A (1996) Collaborative hip-fracture rehabilitation: defining current strategies in Wales. Age Ageing 25(S2):12Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Heyburn G, Beringer T, Elliott J, Marsh D (2004) Orthogeriatric care in patients with fractures of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop 425:35–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    British Orthopaedic Association (2007) The care of patients with fragility fracture [Online]. Available: http://www.fractures.com/pdf/BOA-BGS-Blue-Book.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2016
  71. 71.
    National Clinical Guideline Centre (2011) The management of hip fracture in adults [Online]. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG124. Accessed 12 June 2016
  72. 72.
    NICE quality standard [QS 16] (2012) Hip fracture in adults [Online]. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs16. Accessed 12 June 2016
  73. 73.
    RIKSHÖFT. About Rikshöft [Online]. Available: http://rikshoft.se/about-rikshoft/. Accessed 12 June 2016
  74. 74.
    RCP – Falls and Fragility Fractures Audit Program (2016) National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) annual report 2015 [Online]. Available: http://www.nhfd.co.uk/nhfd/nhfd2015reportPR1.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2016
  75. 75.
    Boulton C, Wakeman R (2016) Lessons from the national hip fracture database. Orthop Trauma 30(2):123–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Neuburger J, Currie C, Wakeman R et al (2015) The impact of a national clinician-led audit initiative on care and mortality after hip fracture in England: an external evaluation using time trends in non-audit data. Med Care 53:686–691CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    International Society for Fracture Repair. Osteoporotic fracture campaign [Online]. Available: http://www.fractures.com/about_ofc.html. Accessed 13 June 2016
  78. 78.
    Fragility Fracture Network (2014) FFN Hip Fracture Audit Database (HFAD) [Online]. Available: http://web1.crownaudit.org/FFN/info.nsf/vwcontent/MCDv1.6. Accessed 13 June 2016
  79. 79.
    Fragility Fracture Network (2015) REPORT of the pilot phase [Online]. Available: http://fragilityfracturenetwork.org/files/ffn-hfad_pilot_phase_2nd_report.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2016
  80. 80.
    DePuy Synthes (2016) Synthes geriatric fracture program [Online]. Available: http://www.synthes.com/sites/NA/MedicalCommunity/geriatric-fracture-program/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 13 June 2016
  81. 81.
    AOTrauma (2016) Courses: orthogeriatrics [Online]. Available: https://aotrauma.aofoundation.org/Structure/education/educational-programs/orthogeriatrics/Pages/courses.aspx. Accessed 13 June 2016
  82. 82.
    Liem IS, Kammerlander C, Suhm N et al (2013) Identifying a standard set of outcome parameters for the evaluation of orthogeriatric co-management for hip fractures. Injury 44:1403–1412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Roth T, Beck S, Cunningham M, Gosch M (2016) Development and initial evaluation of a point-of-care educational app on medical topics in orthogeriatrics. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(1):65–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations