Advertisement

How to Track the Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer Patients?

  • Maura Campitelli
  • Loredana Dinapoli
Chapter

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second commonest cause of cancer-related deaths in the developed world [1]. Surgical resection provides the best hope of cure, and a modest additional survival benefit can be gained from adjuvant chemotherapy [1, 2], especially for colon cancer. The use of preoperative radio-chemotherapy in rectal cancer (RC) is now widely accepted as standard practice as it is associated with remarkable improvements in loco-regional control and with slight improvements in survival rates [3–5]. Over the past decade, together with the analysis of toxicity, surgical-related morbidity, local recurrence rates, disease free survival and overall survival, there had been an increased attention on the evaluation of patients reported outcomes and quality of life (QoL). Due to the growing number of RC survivors, together with the increased life expectancy, long-term treatment-related morbidity and its effects on QoL have become an important issue. On the other side there is still a 30% of patients at high risk of local and distant failure. In this case an intensified loco-regional and systemic treatment is proposed, which is related with an increased acute and late toxicity. Understanding the consequences of treatment is fundamental to optimize patient support and minimize impact on daily life. In recent years the role the patient plays in reporting significant events related to treatment has become crucial especially after the introduction of patient-reported outcomes [6, 7]. As an “expert of himself” the patient is becoming an “active partner” of health care professionals (HCP) during treatments and follow-up. This partnership can be established only by using effective strategies for communicating with HCP about medications and side effects during and after treatment, and can facilitate the preservation and improvement of patients’ QoL.

References

  1. 1.
    Whistance RN, Conroy T, Chie W, Costantini A, Sezer O, Koller M, Johnson CD, Pilkington SA, Arraras J, Ben-Josef E, Pullyblank AM, Fayers P, Blazeby JM (2009) European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group. Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45:3017–3026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sargent DJ, Goldberg RM, Jacobson SD, Macdonald JS, Labianca R, Haller DG, Shepherd LE, Seitz JF, Francini G (2001) A pooled analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer in elderly patients. N Engl J Med 345:1091–1097CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Putter H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, van Krieken JH, Leer JW, van de Velde CJ (2001) Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guckenberger M, Wulf J, Thalheimer A, Wehner D, Thiede A, Müller G, Sailer M, Flentje M (2009) Prospective phase II study of preoperative short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer with twice daily fractions of 2.9 Gy to a total dose of 29 Gy – long-term results. Radiat Oncol 4:67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Kranenbarg EM, Putter H, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, Påhlman L, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJ (2011) Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol 12:575–582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Basch E, Artz D, Dulko D, Scher K, Sabbatini P, Hensley M, Mitra N, Speakman J, McCabe M, Schrag D (2005) Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:3552–3561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Judson TJ, Bennett AV, Rogak LJ, Sit L, Barz A, Kris MG, Hudis CA, Scher HI, Sabattini P, Schrag D, Basch E (2013) Feasibility of long-term patient self-reporting of toxicities from home via the internet during routine chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 31:2580–2585CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, van den Brink M, Maas CP, Martijn H, Rutten HJ, Wiggers T, Kranenbarg EK, Leer JW, Stiggelbout AM (2005) Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 23:1847–1858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lange MM, Den Dulk M, Bossema ER, Maas CP, Peeters KC, Rutten HJ, Klein Kranenbarg E, Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ (2007) Cooperative clinical investigators of the Dutch Total mesorectal excision trial. Risk factors for faecal incontinence after rectal cancer treatment. Br J Surg 94:1278–1284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Incrocci L, Jensen PT (2013) Pelvic radiotherapy and sexual function in men and women. J Sex Med 10(Suppl 1):53–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Addis ME, Mahalik JR (2003) Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. Am Psychol 58:5–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ekwall E, Ternestedt BM, Sorbe B (2003) Important aspects of health care for women with gynecologic cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 30:313–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Averyt JC, Nishimoto PW (2014) Addressing sexual dysfunction in colorectal cancer survivorship care. J Gastrointest Oncol 5:388–394PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guren MG, Dueland S, Skovlund E, Fosså SD, Poulsen JP, Tveit KM (2003) Quality of life during radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 39:587–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G et al (1993) The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11:570–579CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, Cohen PD, Essink-Bot ML, Fekkes M, Sanderman R, Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Verrips E (1998) Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 health survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1055–1068CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sprangers MAG, te Velde A, Aaronson NK (1999) The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). Eur J Cancer 35:238–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Eckel R, Sauer H, Holzel D (2003) Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study. Ann Surg 238:203–213PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gujral S, Conroy T, Fleissner C, Sezer O, King PM, Avery KN, Sylvester P, Koller M, Sprangers MA, Blazeby JM (2007) European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group. Assessing quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: an update of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Cancer 43:1564–1573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG, Gottesman L, Paty PB, Weiser MR, Guillem JG, Minsky BD, Kalman M, Thaler HT, Schrag D, Wong WD (2005) The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1353–1365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jensen PT (2004) Validation of a questionnaire for self-assessment of sexual function and vaginal changes after gynaecological cancer. Psychooncology 13:577–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH (1999) Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the international index of erectile function. Urology 54:346–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wiltink LM, Chen TY, Nout RA, Kranenbarg EM, Fiocco M, Laurberg S, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA (2014) Health-related quality of life 14 years after preoperative short-term radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomised trial. Eur J Cancer 50:2390–2398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thong MS, Mols F, Lemmens VE, Rutten HJ, Roukema JA, Martijn H, van de Poll-Franse LV (2011) Impact of preoperative radiotherapy on general and disease-specific health status of rectal cancer survivors: a population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:e49–e58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bruheim K, Tveit KM, Skovlund E, Balteskard L, Carlsen E, Fosså SD, Guren MG (2010) Sexual function in females after radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Acta Oncol 49:826–832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bruheim K, Tveit KM, Skovlund E, Balteskard L, Carlsen E, Fosså SD, Guren MG (2010) Sexual function in males after radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:1012–1017CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nicolaije KA, Husson O, Ezendam NP, Vos MC, Kruitwagen RF, Lybeert ML, van de Poll-Franse LV (2012) Endometrial cancer survivors are unsatisfied with received information about diagnosis, treatment and follow-up: a study from the population-based profiles registry. Patient Educ Couns 88:427–435CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kunneman M, Marijnen CA, Rozema T, Ceha HM, Grootenboers DA, Neelis KJ, Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH (2015) Decision consultations on preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: large variation in benefits and harms that are addressed. Br J Cancer 112:39–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kunneman M, Pieterse AH, Stiggelbout AM, Marijnen CA (2015) Which benefits and harms of preoperative radiotherapy should be addressed? A Delphi consensus study among rectal cancer patients and radiation oncologists. Radiother Oncol 114:212–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H (2006) Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 53:205–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Catholic University of the Sacred HeartRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations