What Is the Correct Procedure for Handling the Surgical Specimen

  • N. Scott


In spite of recent developments in the pre-operative imaging of rectal cancer, pathological examination of the operative specimen remains a key part of the management of rectal cancer. The pathologist’s report allows the patient to be placed in a prognostic category, indicates the likelihood of tumour recurrence and determines the need for post-operative adjuvant therapy. A good macroscopic description, especially when supplemented with high-quality digital images, facilitates audit of the quality of radiology and surgery. Accurate recording of a minimum standardised pathological dataset is vital to stratification and interpretation of clinical trials, comparison of outcomes between different centres and health care systems and evaluating the impact of population-based interventions such as bowel cancer screening and the conduct of epidemiological studies.


  1. 1.
    Abdulkader M, Abdulla K, Rakha E, Kaye P (2006) Routine elastic staining assists detection of vascular invasion in colorectal cancer. Histopathology 49:487–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F et al (1996) Manual dissection of adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum specimens for detection of lymph node metastases smaller than 5mm. Cancer 77:607–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Branston LK, Greening S, Newcombe RG et al (2002) The implementation of guidelines and computerised forms improves the completeness of cancer pathology reporting. The CROPS project: a randomised controlled trial in pathology. Eur J Cancer 38:743–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Engelen SME, Beets-Tan RGH, Lahaye MJ, Kessels AGH, Beets GL (2008) Location of involved mesorectal and extramesorectal lymph nodes in patients with primary rectal cancer: preoperative assessment with MR imaging. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:776–781CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldstein NS, Turner JR (2000) Pericolonic tumor deposits in patients with T3N+M0 Colon adenocarcinomas. Cancer 88:2228–2238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamilton SR, Bosman FT, Boffetta P et al (2010) Carcinoma of the colon and rectum. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. IARC, LyonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lewin MR, Fenton H, Burkart AL et al (2007) Poorly differentiated colorectal carcinoma with invasion restricted to lamina propria (intramucosal carcinoma): a follow-up study of 15 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 31:1882–1886CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loughrey MB, Quirke P, Shepherd NA (2014) Standards and datasets for reporting cancers. Dataset for colorectal cancer histopathology reports July 2014. Accessed 1/12/2015
  9. 9.
    Mercury Study Group (2007) Extramural depth of tumour invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: results of the MERCURY study. Radiology 243:132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Merkel S, Mansmann U, Siassi M, Papadopoulos T, Hohenberger W, Hermanek P (2001) The prognostic inhomogeneity in pT3 rectal carcinomas. Int J Color Dis 16:298–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitchard JR, Love SB, Baxter KJ, Shepherd NA (2010) How important is peritoneal involvement in rectal cancer? A prospective study of 331 cases. Histopathology 57:671–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CAM et al (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimetre but two millimetres is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26:350–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nagtegaal ID, Tot T, Jayne DG et al (2011) Lymph nodes, tumor deposits and TNM: are we getting better ? J Clin Oncol 29:2487–2492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagtegaal ID, Van de Velde CJH, Marijnen CAM, Van Krieken JHJM, Quirke P (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23:9257–9264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nagtegaal ID, Van de Velde CJH, Van der Worp E et al (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20:1729–1734CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2(8514):996–998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quirke P, Morris E (2007) Reporting colorectal cancer. Histopathology 50:103–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J et al (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373:821–828CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ratto C, Ricci R, Rossi C, Morelli U, Vecchio FM, Doglietto GB (2002) Mesorectal microfoci adversely affect the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum 45:733–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rickles AS, Dietz DW, Chang GJ et al (2015) High rate of circumferential resection margins following rectal cancer surgery: a call to action. Ann Surg 262:891–898CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shia J, Stadler Z, Weiser MR et al (2011) Immunohistochemical staining for DNA mismatch repair proteins in intestinal tract carcinoma: how reliable are biopsy samples? Am J Surg Pathol 35:447–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shihab OC, Quirke P, Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Brown G (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging detected lymph nodes close to the mesorectal fascia are rarely a cause of margin involvement after total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 97:1431–1436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shirouzu K, Isomoto H, Kakegawa T (1995) Distal spread of rectal cancer and optimal distal margin of resection for sphincter-preserving surgery. Cancer 76:388–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (1997) International Union Against Cancer TNM classification of malignant tumors, 5th edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (2002) International Union Against Cancer TNM classification of malignant tumors, 6th edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (eds) (2009) International Union Against Cancer TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Hoboken, WileyGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sternberg A, Mizrahi A, Amar M, Groisman G (2006) Detection of venous invasion in surgical specimens of colorectal carcinoma: the efficacy of various types of tissue blocks. J Clin Pathol 59:207–210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Talbot IC, Ritchie S, Leighton MH, Hughes AO, Bussey HJR, Morson BC (1980) The clinical significance of invasion of veins by rectal cancer. Br J Surg 67:439–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Taylor FGM, Quirke P, Heald RJ et al (2011) Preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can identify good prognosis stage I, II and III rectal cancer best managed by surgery alone. Ann Surg 2011(253):711–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tekkis PP, Heriot AG, Smith J, Thompson R, Finan P, Stamatakis JD (2005) Comparison of circumferential margin involvement between restorative and nonrestorative resections for rectal cancer. Color Dis 7:369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJE, Holm T, Quirke P (2010) Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:588–599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wong NACS, Gonzalez D, Salto-Tellez M et al (2014) RAS testing of colorectal carcinoma: a guidance document from the Association of Clinical Pathologists molecular pathology and diagnostics group. J Clin Pathol 67:751–757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistopathologyLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations