Skip to main content

Minimally Invasive Esophageal Resection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Principles of Minimally Invasive Procedures

Abstract

In 1991, Dallemagne introduced the right thoracoscopic approach for oesophageal cancer with total lung block, thereby mimicking the conventional approach.. Initial reports showed a high conversion rate to thoracotomy and a high respiratory morbidity. Searching for reduction of the conversion rate and the respiratory infection rate, Cuschieri et al. designed the thoracoscopic approach in prone decubitus position so that a total collapse of the lung was no longer necessary for dissecting the oesophagus and thereby possibly reducing the rate of respiratory infections. After a feasibility period, the Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE) approach in prone or lateral position is widely implemented and increasingly performed all over the world for patients with resectable esophageal cancer to reduce postoperative respiratory complications and enhance the quality of life by avoiding a right thoracotomy and laparotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C. Thoracoscopic esophageal resection. In: Cuesta MA, Nagy AG, editors. Minimally invasive surgery in gastrointestinal cancer. Edingburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1993. p. 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cuschieri A. thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994;2:21–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003;238:486–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position-experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;2006:7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scheepers JJ, Veenhof XA, van der Peet DL, et al. Laparoscopic transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus: outcome of the first 50 resected patients. Surgery. 2008;143:278–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Hagen P, Huslhof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cuesta MA, Weijs TJ, Bleys RL, et al. A new concept of the anatomy of the thoracic esophagus: the meso-esophagus. Observational study during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2576–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weijs TJ, Ruurda JP, Luyer MDP, et al. Preserving the pulmonary vagus nerve branches during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016.30(9):3816–22. (Epub ahead of print).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hulscher JBF, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Ono Y, et al. Background of lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. In: Sato T, Lizukan T, editors. In color atlas of surgical anatomy for esophageal cancer. Springer-Verlag; 1992, p. 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Carcinoma of the cardia: carcinoma of the Gastroesophageal junction. classification, pathology and extent of resection. Dis Esophagus. 1996;9:173–82.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Biere SS, Cuesta MA, Van der Peet DL. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir. 2009;64:121–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Biere SS, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg. 2011;28:29–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: a multicentre, open –label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Quality of life and late complications after Minimally Invasive compared to open esophagectomy: results of a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2015;39:1986–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL, Biere SSAY, Scheepers JJG, Heijnen BHM. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. In: Puntambeker S, Cuesta MA, editors. Atlas of minimally invasive surgery in esophageal carcinoma. Springer; 2010. p. 171–89.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cuesta MA, Scheepers JJG, Oosterhuis W, Biere SSAY, Van der Peet DL, Heijnen BHM. Thoracoscopic esophageal resection for cancer in prone decubitus position: operative technique. In: Puntambeker S, Cuesta MA, editors. Atlas of minimally invasive surgery in esophageal carcinoma. Springer; 2010. p. 149–69.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maas KW, Biere SS, Scheepers JJG, et al. Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for cancer. A review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1795–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Puntambekar S, Patil AM, Rayate NV, Joshi S N. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy with two field nodal clearance. In: Puntambeker S, Cuesta MA, editors. Atlas of minimally invasive surgery in esophageal carcinoma. Springer; 2010. p. 33–109.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weijs TJ, Berkelmans GHK, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, et al. Routes for early enteral nutrition following esophagectomy. A systematic review. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(1):1–6. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 1. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Blom RLGM, van der Peet DL, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Chapter 8. Prevention and treatment of major complications after esophageal surgery. In: Cuesta MA, Bonjer HJ, editors. Treatment of postoperative complications after digestive surgery. Springer; 2014. p. 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Straatman J, Joosten PJ, Terwee CB, Cuesta MA, Jansma EP, van der Peet DL. Systematic review of patient-reported-outcomes-measures in the surgical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2015. doi:10.1111/dote.12405. (Epub ahead of print)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald L. van der Peet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Peet, D.L., Cuesta, M.A. (2017). Minimally Invasive Esophageal Resection. In: Bonjer, H. (eds) Surgical Principles of Minimally Invasive Procedures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43196-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43196-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43194-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43196-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics