Skip to main content

Is the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score the Best Way to Evaluate Liver Transplant Patients Preoperatively?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
You’re Wrong, I’m Right
  • 123 Accesses

Abstract

A 52-year-old male with a past medical history of hepatitis C cirrhosis, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and a body mass index of 34 presents for deceased donor liver transplantation. He has been on the liver transplant list for 6 months. His international normalized ratio (INR) is 2.1, creatinine is 1.6, and total bilirubin is 8.4, and he has never undergone renal replacement therapy. As a result, his preoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is 27. In the holding area, he responds appropriately to most questions, although his wife reports that he has seemed more confused in the past 2 days. On physical exam, you note that the patient is diffusely jaundiced, has spider angiomas, and has marked ascites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kamath PS, Kim WR. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology. 2007;45(3):797–808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wagener G, editor. Liver anesthesiology and critical care medicine. New York, NY: Springer; 2013. p. 48–81.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hofer I, Spivak J, Yaport M, Zerillo J, Reich DL, Wax D, DeMaria S Jr. Association between anesthesiologist experience and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2015;21:89–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pugh RNH, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973;60(8):646–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cholongitas E, Marelli L, Shusang V, Senzolo M, Rolles K, Patch D, Burroughs AK. A systematic review of the performance of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) in the setting of liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:1049–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tandon P, Ney M, Irwin I, Ma MM, Gramlich L, Bain VG, et al. Severe muscle depletion in patients on the liver transplant wait list: its prevalence and independent prognostic value. Liver Transpl. 2012;18:1209–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Organ Procurement and Transplant Network. At-a-Glance: Proposal to Cap the HCC Exception Score at 34.: US Department of Health & Human Services. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/PublicComment/pubcommentPropSub_330.pdf. Published March 14, 2014. Accessed 3 Nov 2015.

  8. Watt K, Lyden E, McCashland T. Poor survival after liver retranplantation: is hepatitis C to blame? Liver Transpl. 2003;9:1019–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Coombes J, Trotter JF. Development of the allocation system for deceased donor liver transplantation. Clin Med Res. 2005;3:87–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeron Zerillo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heller, B., Zerillo, J. (2017). Is the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score the Best Way to Evaluate Liver Transplant Patients Preoperatively?. In: Scher, C., Clebone, A., Miller, S., Roccaforte, J., Capan, L. (eds) You’re Wrong, I’m Right. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43169-7_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43169-7_66

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43167-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43169-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics