Abstract
Around 150 patients per 100,000 inhabitants in the western world live with a stoma for various reasons. Half of these patients will have a reversal of their stoma. In patients having a stoma for lifetime, the quality of life can be reduced by having the stoma per se, or get even worse, when having an associate complication like a parastomal hernia.
A parastomal hernia is commonly seen in stoma patients varying in frequency due to type of stoma and the position of it in the abdominal wall. Operative factors and the patient’s own risk factors can affect the outcome. The techniques lounged for the repair of a parastomal hernia are several and the results are not too encouraging with several associated problems. It can though be concluded that a simple suture repair will not do. The development of techniques used for mesh placement (open and laparoscopic), various positions of the mesh in the abdominal wall as well as the types of meshes (material, coatings, fixation and specially designed) are factors that are difficult to study for outcome in this huge mass of factors that could influence the outcome.
Prophylactic mesh reinforcement has been launched with the aim to reduce the risk for the development of a parastomal hernia. The results seem favourable, but the optimal indications and results for specific stoma types are still under debate.
There is still a lot of work to be done for the stoma patients. The golden opportunity will be when crating the stoma.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Herrle F, Sandra-Petrescu F, Weiss C, Post S, Runkel N, Kienle P. Quality of life and timing of stoma closure in patients with rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection with diverting stoma: a multicenter longitudinal observational study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(4):281–90. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000545.
Halabi WJ, Jafari MD, Carmichael JC, Nguyen VQ, Mills S, Phelan M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open repair of parastomal hernias: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4067–72.
Arnison WC. Remarks on colotomy. Br Med J. 1889;1(1467):295–6.
Śmietański M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA, Berger D, Bury K, Conze J, et al. European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias. Hernia. 2014;18(1):1–6. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1162-z.
Jänes A, Weisby L, Israelsson LA. Parastomal hernia: clinical and radiological definitions. Hernia. 2011;15(2):189–92. doi:10.1007/s10029-010-0769-6.
Näsvall P, Wikner F, Gunnarsson U, Rutegård J, Strigård K. A comparison between intrastomal 3D ultrasonography, CT scanning and findings at surgery in patients with stomal complaints. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29(10):1263–6. doi:10.1007/s00384-014-1944-.
Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. 2003;90(7):784–93.
Hong SY, Oh SY, Lee JH, Kim DY, Suh KW. Risk factors for parastomal hernia: based on radiological definition. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;84(1):43–7. doi:10.4174/jkss.2013.84.1.43.
Pilgrim CH, McIntyre R, Bailey M. Prospective audit of parastomal hernia: prevalence and associated comorbidities. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(1):71–6. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181bdee8c.
Marinez AC, González E, Holm K, Bock D, Prytz M, Haglind E, et al. Stoma-related symptoms in patients operated for rectal cancer with abdominoperineal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31(3):635–41. doi:10.1007/s00384-015-2491-4.
Aquina CT, Iannuzzi JC, Probst CP, Kelly KN, Noyes K, Fleming FJ, et al. Parastomal hernia: a growing problem with new solutions. Dig Surg. 2014;31(4-5):366–76. doi:10.1159/000369279.
Hotouras A, Bhan C, Murphy J, Chan CL, Williams NS. Parastomal hernia prevention: is it all about mesh reinforcement? Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(12):e443–4. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000255.
Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Jorgensen LN, Wara P, Bisgaard T. Risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrence after parastomal hernia repair: a nationwide study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(11):1265–72. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a0e6e2.
Kald A, Juul KN, Hjortsvang H, Sjödahl R. Quality of life is impaired in patients with peristomal bulging of a sigmoid colostomy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(5):627–33. doi:10.1080/00365520701858470.
Köhler G, Mayer F, Wundsam H, Schrittwieser R, Emmanuel K, Lechner M. Changes in the surgical management of parastomal hernias over 15 years: results of 135 cases. World J Surg. 2015;39(11):2795–804. doi:10.1007/s00268-015-3187-1.
Hardt J, Meerpohl JJ, Metzendorf MI, Kienle P, Post S, Herrle F. Lateral pararectal versus transrectal stoma placement for prevention of parastomal herniation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11, CD009487. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD00948.
Donahue TF, Bochner BH, Sfakianos JP, Kent M, Bernstein M, Hilton WM, et al. Risk factors for the development of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2014;191(6):1708–13. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.12.041.
Al Shakarchi J, Williams JG. Systematic review of open techniques for parastomal hernia repair. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(5):427–32. doi:10.1007/s10151-013-1110-z.
Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS, Groenewoud HM, Buyne OR, de Hingh IH, et al. Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg. 2012;255:685–95.
Rosin JD, Bonardi RA. Paracolostomy hernia repair with Marlex mesh: a new technique. Dis Colon Rectum. 1977;20(4):299–302.
Sugarbaker PH. Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of paraostomy hernias. Ann Surg. 1985;201(3):344.
DeAsis FJ, Lapin B, Gitelis ME, Ujiki MB. Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(28):8670–7. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8670.
Berger D, Bientzle M. Polyvinylidene Xuoride: a suitable mesh material for laparoscopicincisional and parastomal hernia repair! A prospective, observational study with 344 patients. Hernia. 2009;13:167–72. doi:10.1007/s10029-008-0435-4.
Chen J, Zhang Y, Jiang C, Yu H, Zhang K, Zhang M, et al. Temporary ileostomy versus colostomy for colorectal anastomosis: evidence from 12 studies. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(5):556–62. doi:10.3109/00365521.2013.779019.
Gillern S, Bleier JI. Parastomal hernia repair and reinforcement: the role of biologic and synthetic materials. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014;27(4):162–71. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1394090.
Berger D. Prevention of parastomal hernias by prophylactic use of a specially designed intraperitoneal onlay mesh (Dynamesh IPST). Hernia. 2008;12(3):243–6.
Shabbir J, Chaudhary BN, Dawson R. A systematic review on the use of prophylactic mesh during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia formation. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(8):931–6. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02835.x.
Lee L, Saleem A, Landry T, Latimer E, Chaudhury P, Feldman LS. Cost effectiveness of mesh prophylaxis to prevent parastomal hernia in patients undergoing permanent colostomy for rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(1):82–91. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.01.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Montgomery, A. (2017). Parastomal Hernia. In: Hope, W., Cobb, W., Adrales, G. (eds) Textbook of Hernia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43045-4_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43045-4_44
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43043-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43045-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)