Advertisement

Essential Instruments and Disposable Supplies for an IVF Laboratory

  • Leslie Weikert
  • Christa Mackenzie
  • Klaus E. WiemerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is intended to serve as a guide in selecting the necessary equipment and disposable supplies required to start an in vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratory. For a new lab, it is very important to select the major pieces of equipment at the outset of the design phase so that the floor plan can accommodate them in an efficient and well-thought-out manner. The type of equipment selected should be a process that involves both the physician and the laboratory director so that the center can maximize usage of the equipment and space. The new space should be designed to handle anticipated growth as well as changes in the complexity of lab procedures performed. The selection of disposables is almost an arbitrary selection that should be based upon the needs of the director and staff. An efficient inventory system and quality control program will insure that the proper quantity and quality of materials are on hand at all times.

Keywords

IVF laboratory instruments Instruments for the IVF laboratory Microscopes Incubators Cryopreservation and storage equipment 

References

  1. 1.
    Barnes FL. Equipment and general technical aspects of micromanipulation of gametes and embryos. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, editors. Textbook of assisted reproductive techniques: laboratory and clinical perspectives. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd; 2001. p. 139–46.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lane M, Mitchell M, Cashman KS, Feil D, Wakefield S, Zander-Fox DL. To QC or not to QC: the key to a consistent laboratory? Reprod Fertil Dev. 2008;20:23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swain JE. Optimal human embryo culture. Semin Reprod Med. 2015;33(2):103–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Swain JE. Decisions for the IVF laboratory: comparative analysis of embryo culture incubators. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(5):535–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swain JE. Could time-lapse embryo imaging reduce the need for biopsy and PGS? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(8):1081–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davidson A, Vermesh M, Lobo R, Paulson R. Mouse embryo culture as quality control for human in vitro fertilization: the one-cell versus the two-cell model. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:516–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tucker KE, Jansen C. The mouse embryo bioassay: is it the “gold standard” for quality control in the laboratory. In: Allahbadia GN, Das BR, editors. The art and science of assisted reproductive techniques. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd; 2002. p. 249–53.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    George MA, Braude PR, Johnson MH, Sweetnam DG. Quality control in the IVF laboratory: in vitro and in vivo development of mouse embryos is unaffected by the quality of water used in culture media. Hum Reprod. 1989;4:826–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen J, Gilligan A, Willadsen S. Culture and quality control of embryos. Hum Reprod. 1998;3(Suppl 3):137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gilligan A, Schimmel T, Esposito B Jr, Cohen J. O-105. Release of volatile organic compounds such as styrene from sterile petri dishes and flasks used for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(1):S52–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holyoak GR, Wang S, Liu Y, Bunch TD. Toxic effects of ethylene oxide residues on bovine embryos in vitro. Toxicology. 1996;108:33–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie Weikert
    • 1
  • Christa Mackenzie
    • 2
  • Klaus E. Wiemer
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.A.R.T. Institute of Washington, Inc.RockvilleUSA
  2. 2.Reproductive Science Center of the San Francisco Bay AreaSan RamonUSA
  3. 3.Poma FertilityKirklandUSA

Personalised recommendations