Skip to main content

IVF Data Management: From Clipboards to Smart Apps

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
In Vitro Fertilization

Abstract

It is estimated that doctors and other healthcare professionals spend close to 50% of their time shuffling through paper charts, forms, messages, and reports. Improved scrutiny and oversight through nongovernmental and governmental inspections and audits are clearly increasing this burden. This is especially true in assisted reproduction where laboratory staff may spend even more time on paperwork than other team members. It is estimated that only 50% of IVF clinics have implemented an electronic medical record (EMR) system, although this figure is difficult to confirm since no studies have been published on the topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. Administrative work consumes one-sixth of U.S. physicians’ working hours and lowers their career satisfaction. Int J Health Serv. 2014;44:635–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fahimi F, Abbasi Nazari M, Abrishami R, Sistanizad M, Mazidi T, Faghihi T, Soltani R, Baniasadi S. Transcription errors observed in teaching hospital. Arch Iran Med. 2009;12:173–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird NM. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:377–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L, Prgomet M, Reynolds S, Goeders L, Westbrook J, Tutty M, Blike G. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Intern Med. 2016;165:753–60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedberg MW, Chen PG, Van Busum KR, Aunon FM, Pham C, Caloyeras JP, Mattke S, Pitchforth E, Quigley DD, Brook RH, Crosson FJ, Tutty M. Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems, and health policy. The Rand Corporation and American Medical Association, Rand Health. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  7. IBM bringing big data to the enterprise. 2017. https://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/bigdata/what-is-big-data.html

  8. Westgard JO, Groth T, Aronsson T, Falk H, de Verdier CH. Performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control: probabilities for false rejection and error detection. Clin Chem. 1977;23:1857–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bayat H. Selecting multi-rule quality control procedures based on patient risk. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55(11):1702–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-1077.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques Cohen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Review Points

Review Points

  1. 1.

    There are enormous advantages to electronic recordkeeping in ART. Though limitations related to clinical and laboratory practice variation among users exist, requiring customization at high cost, new and innovative ways of coding could overcome these limitations.

  2. 2.

    Only one of the three areas (EMR, enterprise, and QM) of ART clinic data handling has been addressed by commercially available electronic practice management products.

  3. 3.

    A first app for QC tracking of instruments has been recently introduced, but the field is in great need of a recordkeeping overhaul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cohen, J., Fiser, S., Tomkin, G. (2019). IVF Data Management: From Clipboards to Smart Apps. In: Nagy, Z., Varghese, A., Agarwal, A. (eds) In Vitro Fertilization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43011-9_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43011-9_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43010-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43011-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics