Predicting Embryo Implantation Potential Using Video Monitoring by the EmbryoScope Time-Lapse System

  • Lucía Alegre Ferri
  • Carmela Albert Rodríguez
  • Sonia Pérez Albalá
  • Marcos Meseguer EscriváEmail author


Noninvasive markers of embryo quality are being sought to improve IVF success. Using traditional incubators, inspection is limited to snapshots at a few discrete points in time, reducing the amount of information that could potentially be obtained. Time-lapse monitoring overcomes this limitation without exposing the embryos to environmental changes. Moreover, several recent studies suggest that time-lapse monitoring may introduce new dynamic markers of embryo competence as well as a flexible embryo evaluation and provides extra information regarding embryo development (cell divisions and timing between divisions by recording the dynamic behavior of embryos). This chapter surveys available knowledge on time-lapse using the EmbryoScope® time-lapse system, which allowed us to design a model to predict embryo implantation ability based on the timing and characteristics of cleavage events.


  1. 1.
    Ottosen LDM, Hindkjær J, Ingerslev J. Light exposure of the ovum and preimplantation embryo during ART procedures. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24(2):99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Takenaka M, Horiuchi T, Yanagimachi R. Effects of light on development of mammalian zygotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104(36):14289–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsøe KM, Ramsing NB, Remohí J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(10):2658–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cruz M, Gadea B, Garrido N, Pedersen KS, Martínez M, Pérez-Cano I, et al. Embryo quality, blastocyst and ongoing pregnancy rates in oocyte donation patients whose embryos were monitored by time-lapse imaging. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(7):569–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirkegaard K, Hindkjaer JJ, Grøndahl ML, Kesmodel US, Ingerslev HJ. A randomized clinical trial comparing embryo culture in a conventional incubator with a time-lapse incubator. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(6):565–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rubio I, Kuhlmann R, Agerholm I, Kirk J, Herrero J, Escriba MJ, et al. Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: a time-lapse study. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(6):1458–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Basile N, Morbeck D, García-Velasco J, Bronet F, Meseguer M. Type of culture media does not affect embryo kinetics: a time-lapse analysis of sibling oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(3):634–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meseguer M, Rubio I, Cruz M, Basile N, Marcos J, Requena A. Embryo incubation and selection in a time-lapse monitoring system improves pregnancy outcome compared with a standard incubator: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(6):1481–9.e10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rubio I, Galán A, Larreategui Z, Ayerdi F, Bellver J, Herrero J, Meseguer M. Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1287–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Basile N, Vime P, Florensa M, AparicioRuiz B, García Velasco JA, Remohí J, Meseguer M. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(2):276–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cruz M, Garrido N, Herrero J, Perez-Cano I, Munoz M, Meseguer M. Timing of cell division in human cleavage-stage embryos is linked with blastocyst formation and quality. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25(4):371–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dal Canto M, Coticchio G, Mignini Renzini M, De Ponti E, Novara PV, Brambillasca F, et al. Cleavage kinetics analysis of human embryos predicts development to blastocyst and implantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25(5):474–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Motato Y, De los Santos MJ, Escribá MJ, AparicioRuiz B, Remohí J, Meseguer M. Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(2):376–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Desai N, Ploskonka S, Goodman LR, Austin C, Goldberg J, Falcone T. Analysis of embryo morphokinetics, multinucleation and cleavage anomalies using continuous time-lapse monitoring in blastocyst transfer cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Milewski R, Kuc P, Kuczynska A, Stankiewicz B, Lukaszuk K, Kuczynski W. A predictive model for blastocyst formation based on morphokinetic parameters in time-lapse monitoring of embryo development. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(4):571–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mizobe Y, Oya N, Iwakiri R, Yoshida N, Sato Y, Miyoshi K, Tokunaga M, Ezono Y. Effects of early cleavage patterns of human embryos on subsequent in vitro development and implantation. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(2):348–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aguilar J, Rubio I, Muñoz E, Pellicer A, Meseguer M. Study of nucleation status in the second cell cycle of human embryo and its impact on implantation rate. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(2):291–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Balakier H, Sojecki A, Motamedi G, Librach C. Impact of multinucleated blastomeres on embryo developmental competence, morphokinetics, and aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):608–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kirkegaard K, Hindkjaer JJ, Ingerslev HJ. Human embryonic development after blastomere removal: a time-lapse analysis. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(1):97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, Duffy S, Sedler M, Hickman CFL. Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(5):477–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, Duffy S, Sedler M, Thornton S. Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27(2):140–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chawla M, Fakih M, Shunnar A, Bayram A, Hellani A, Perumal V, Divakaran J, Budak E. Morphokinetic analysis of cleavage stage embryos and its relationship to aneuploidy in a retrospective time-lapse imaging study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(1):69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Basile N, Nogales MC, Bronet F, Florensa M, Riqueiros M, Rodrigo L, García-Velasco J, Meseguer M. Increasing the probability of selecting chromosomally normal embryos by time-lapse morphokinetics analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):699–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Patel DV, Shah PB, Kotdawala AP, Herrero J, Rubio I, Banker MR. Morphokinetic behavior of euploid and aneuploid embryos analyzed by time-lapse in embryoscope. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016;9(2):112–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang Z, Zhang J, Salem SA, Liu X, Kuang Y, Salem RD, Liu J. Selection of competent blastocysts for transfer by combining time-lapse monitoring and array CGH testing for patients undergoing preimplantation genetic screening: a prospective study with sibling oocytes. BMC Med Genomics. 2014;7:38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brodi D, Sugimoto T, Serna JY, Kawachiya S, Kato R, Matsumoto T. Blastocyst collapse is not an independent predictor of reduced live birth: a time-lapse study. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(6):1476–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Galán A, Coello A, Cobo A, Nohales M, Alegre L, Meseguer M. Morphology dynamics of warmed blastocyst are strong predictors of clinical outcome. 32nd Annual ESHRE Congress 2016; O-237.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dominguez F, Meseguer M, Aparicio-Ruiz B, Piqueras P, Quiñonero A, Simón C. New strategy for diagnosing embryo implantation potential by combining proteomics and time-lapse technologies. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(4):908–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucía Alegre Ferri
    • 1
  • Carmela Albert Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Sonia Pérez Albalá
    • 1
  • Marcos Meseguer Escrivá
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.IVF LaboratoryIVI ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations