Advertisement

Offering Multiple Entry-Points into STEM for Young People

  • Wilfried Lepuschitz
  • Gottfried Koppensteiner
  • Munir Merdan
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 457)

Abstract

Enrollment in the STEM fields (science, technology, engineering and math) is not keeping pace with the need. Recent reports indicate a decrease in the number of graduates from STEM fields and a shortage on the job market. Considering these issues, particular attention has been paid developing innovative methods and tools for improved teaching of STEM themes. This work presents an approach involving multiple entry points for young people to engage in the STEM fields. This approach is manifested in the non-profit association Practical Robotics Institute Austria (PRIA) with its activities designed to fill STEM gaps in the Austrian education system and to bring innovative engagement that cannot be found in the classrooms. Thus, STEM literacy is fostered as well as the development of systems thinking, problem solving, and teamwork skills.

Keywords

STEM After-school program Camps Workshops Non-profit association Research Education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 665972.

References

  1. 1.
    Bybee, R.W.: What is STEM education. Science 329, 996 (2010b). doi: 10.1126/science.1194998 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kennedy, T.J., Odell, M.R.L.: Engaging students In STEM education. Sci. Educ. Int. 25(3), 246–258 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lacey, T.A., Wright, B.: Occupational employment projections to 2018. Mon. Labor Rev. 82–109 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sahin, A., Ayar, M.C., Adiguzel, T.: STEM-related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Educ. Sci. Theor. Pract. 14(1), 13–26 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mataric, M.J., Koenig, N.P., Feil-Seifer, D.: Materials for enabling hands-on robotics and stem education. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Robots and Robot Venues: Resources for AI Education, Stanford, CA (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sjberg, S., Schreiner, C.: The next generation of citizens: attitudes to science among youngsters. In: Bauer, M., Allum, N., Shukla, R. (eds.) The Culture of Science How does the Public Relate to Science Across the Globe? Routledge, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    EUK, Science and Technology Report, Eurobarometer (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Industriellenvereinigung: ZAHLEN, DATEN & FAKTEN Arbeitsmarkt und Karrierechancen in Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaften und Technik (2013). http://www.iv-net.at/iv-all/publikationen/file_610.pdf, Accessed 19 Jan 2016
  9. 9.
    Wanek-Zajic, B.: Wohin nach der Ausbildung? Bildungsbezogenes Erwerbskarrierenmonitoring (bibEr), AMS info. No. 222 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Sawyer, R.K.: Optimising learning implications of learning sciences research. In: OECD (Ed.) Innovating to learn, learning to innovate, pp. 45–65. OECD Publishing (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Andres, S.H., Steffen, K., Ben, J.: TALIS 2008 technical report. OECD, Teaching and Learning International Survey, Paris (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Itzek-Greulich, H., Flunger, B., Vollmer, C., Nagengast, B., Rehm, M.: Trautwein U: effects of a science center outreach lab on school students’ achievement are student lab visits needed when they teach what students can learn at school? Learn. Inst. 38, 43–52 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schroeder, C.M., Scott, T.P., Tolson, H., Huang, T.-Y., Lee, Y.-H.: A metaanalysis of national research: effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 44, 1436–1460 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gerber, B., Edmund, M., Cavallo, A.ML.: Development of an informal learning opportunities assay. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 23(6), 569–583 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nite, S., Margaret, M., Capraro, R., Morgan, J., Peterson, C.: Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (stem) education: a longitudinal examination of secondary school intervention. IEEE Front. Educ. Conf. (FIE) (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Commission, European: Science Education Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. European Commission, DirectorateGeneral for Research, Brussels, Belgium (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hussar, K., Schwartz, S., Boiselle, E., Noam, G.G.: Toward a systematic evidence-base for science in out-of-school time: The role of assessment (2008). Accessed 11 Sept 2008Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bucknavage, L.B., Worrell, F.C.: A study of academically talented students in extracurricular activities. J. Second. Gift. Educ. 6(2/3), 74–86 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cardella, M.E., Wolsky, M., Paulsen, C.A., Jones, T.R.: Informal pathways to engineering: preliminary findings. Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana (2014). https://peer.asee.org/20638
  22. 22.
    Fisanick, L.M.: A descriptive study of the middle school science teacher behavior for required student participation in science fair competitions. Published Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania) (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McGee-Brown, M., Martin, C., Monsaas, J., Stombler, M.: What scientists do: Science Olympiad enhancing science inquiry through student collaboration, problem solving, and creativity. Paper presented at the annual National Science Teachers Association meeting, Philadelphia, PA (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kolb, David A., Learning, Experiential: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1984)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vandell, D.L., Shernoff, D., Piece, K., Bold, D., Dadisman, K., Brown, B.: Activities, engagement, and emotion in after-school programs (and elsewhere). New Dir. Youth Dev. 105, 121–129 (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mahoney, J.L., Cairns, B.D., Farmer, T.W.: Promoting interpersonal competence and educational success through extracurricular activity participation. J. Educ. Psychol. 95(2), 409–418 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Johnson, J.: Children, Robotics and Education. In: Artificial Life and Robotics, 16–21. Springer (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Braitenberg, V.: Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology. MIT Press (1986)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stapleton, W., Asiabanpour, B., Stern, H., Gourgey, H.: A Novel Engineering Outreach to High School Education, Imagining and Engineering Future CSET Education, 2009 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference. San Antonio, TX (2009)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stocklmayer, S.M., Rennie, L.J., Gilbert, J.K.: The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Stud. Sci. Educ. 46(1), 1–44 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rennie, L.J., Howitt, C.: Science has changed my life!: Evaluation of the scientists in schools project (A report prepared for CSIRO.). Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Canberra, Australia. Accessed 25 Nov 2009Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cohen, C., Patterson, D.G.: The emerging role of science teachers in facilitating STEM career awareness (2012). Retrieved from http://nwabr.org/sites/default/files/pagefiles/teaching-STEM-career-awarenessPRINT.pdf
  33. 33.
    Novotny, L.: Mensch-Maschine Schnittstelle im Bereich der mobilen Robotik; supervisors: M. G. Koppensteiner, PRIA, Tesar, FH Technikum Wien (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Krofitsch, C.: Remote Debugging Environment for Educational Robotics; supervisor: P. Vienna University of Technology, Puschner (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chua, D.: Entwicklung und Umsetzung von Augmented Reality im Bereich der Industrierobotik; supervisors: C. W. Lepuschitz, PRIA, Engelhardt-Nowitzki, Technikum Wien (2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Krofitsch, C., Hinger, C., Merdan, M., Koppensteiner, G.: Smartphone driven control of robots for education and research. In: IEEE 2013 International Conference on Robotics, Biomimetics, Intelligent Computational Systems, Yogyakarta, Indonesien (2013)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Krofitsch, C., Lepuschitz, W., Klein, M., Koppensteiner, G.: Flexible development environment for educational robotics. In: International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics, Singapore (2015)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Koza, C., Krofitsch, C., Lepuschitz, W., Koppensteiner, G.: Hedgehog: a smart phone driven controller for educational roboticspaper. In: 6th International Conference on Robotics in Education, Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland (2015)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lepuschitz, W., Lobato-Jimenez, A., Axinia, E., Merdan, M.: A survey on standards and ontologies for process automation. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Industrial Applications of Holonic and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 22–32 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wilfried Lepuschitz
    • 1
  • Gottfried Koppensteiner
    • 1
  • Munir Merdan
    • 1
  1. 1.Practical Robotics Institute AustriaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations