Beyond Euroscepticism. A Multidimensional Perspective

  • Danilo Di Mauro
  • Vincenzo Memoli
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the definition of attitudes toward Europe, showing the limits of the concept of Euroscepticism. This concept was recently challenged by theoretical approaches, showing that attitudes toward the EU have multiple dimensions. By providing theoretical arguments and reviewing empirical tests, the authors claim that: (1) people distinguish between diffuse support and specific support; (2) European identity could be considered empirically a different dimension of support for Europe; (3) European citizens distinguish between support (diffuse and specific) for the EU and for the process of European integration. The authors conclude that Easton’s concept of support is a better descriptor for attitudes toward Europe than Euroscepticism, both in theoretical and empirical terms.

Keywords

Euroscepticism Support for Europe Attitudes toward Europe European identity EU democracy Trust Responsibility European Union Easton Consensus 

References

  1. Beaudonnet, L., & Di Mauro, D. (2012). Support for Europe: Assessing the complexity of individual attitudes. In Laurie Beaudonnet and Danilo Di Mauro (Eds.), Beyond Euro-skepticism, understanding attitudes towards the EU. European Integration online Papers, special issue, 16(2).Google Scholar
  2. Bellucci, P., Sanders, D., & Serricchio, F. (2012). Explaining European identity. In D. Sanders, P. Bellucci, G. Tòka, & M. Torcal (Eds.), The Europeanisation of national politics? Citizenship and support in a post-enlarged Union (pp. 61–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boomgaarden, H. G., Achuck, A. R. T., Elenbaas, M., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of euroscepticism and EU support. European Union Politics, 12(2): 241–266, first published online 26 April 2011.Google Scholar
  4. Dahl, R. A. (2001). Democracy. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 3405–3408). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Mauro, D., & Fraile, M. (2011). Resilience of EU support and of ‘Feeling European’ in the face of economic crisis. Spotlight Report N.3, http://www.eui.eu/Projects/EUDOPublicOpinion/EUDOSpotlight.aspx
  6. Down, I., & Wilson, C. J. (2008). From ‘permissive consensus’ to ‘constraining dissensus’: A polarizing union? Acta Politica, 43, 26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(October), 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eichenberg, R. C., & Dalton, R. J. (1993). Europeans and the European community: The dynamics of public support for European integration. International Organization, 47(4), 507–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fossum, J. E., & Menendez, A. J. (2011). Constitution’s gift: A constitutional theory for the European Union. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Fuchs, D., Magni-Berton, R., & Roger, A. (2009). Eurosceptisism. Images of Europe among mass publics and political elites. Opladen & Farmington Hills, MI: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Gabel, M. J. (1998). Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. Journal of Politics, 60(2), 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibson, J. (1989). Understandings of justice: Institutional legitimacy, procedural justice, and political tolerance. Law & Society Review, 23, 469–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hobolt, S. B., & Brouard, S. (2010). Contesting the European Union? Why the Dutch and the French rejected the European Constitution. Political Research Quarterly, 64(2), 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobolt, S. B., & Tilley, J. (2014). Blaming Europe? Responsibility without accountability in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European Integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Inglehart, R. (1970). Cognitive mobilization and European Identity. Comparative Politics, 3, 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Inglehart, R., Rabier, J., & Reif, K. (1991). The evolution of public attitudes toward European Integration: 1970–86. In K. Reif & R. Inglehart (Eds.), Eurobarometer: The dynamics of European public opinion, (pp. 111–131). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Karp, J. A., Banducci, S. A., & Bowler, S. (2003). To know it is to love it? Satisfaction with democracy in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 36(3), 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kopecky, P., & Mudde, C. (2002). The two sides of Euroscepticism: Party positions on European integration in East Central Europe. European Union Politics, 3(3), 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindberg, L. N., & Scheingold, S. A. (1970). Europe’s would-be polity: Patterns of change in the European community. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Lubbers, M., & Scheepers, P. (2005). Political versus instrumental Euro-scepticism. Mapping scepticism in European countries and regions. European Union Politics, 6(2), 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moravcsik, A. (1991). Negotiating the single European Act: National interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community. International Organization, 45(1), 19–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Niedermayer, O., & Westle, B. (1995). A typology of orientations. In O. Niedermayer & R. Sinnott (Eds.), Public opinion and internationalized governance (pp. 33–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rohrschneider, R. (2002). The democratic deficit and mass support for an EU-wide government. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanders, D., Bellucci, P., Tòka, G., & Torcal, M. (2012). The Europeanisation of national politics? Citizenship and support in a post-enlarged union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Saris, W. E., & Sniderman, P. M. (2004). Studies in public opinion: attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  28. Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing in Europe. Effective and democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Taggart, P. (1998). A touchstone of dissent: Euroscepticism in contemporary Western European party systems. European Journal of Political Research, 33, 363–388.Google Scholar
  30. Taggart, P., & Szczerbiak, A. (2002). The party politics of euroscepticism in EU member and candidate states. SEI Working Paper No. 51 (Opposing Europe Research Network Working Paper No. 6), Sussex European Institute, Sussex.Google Scholar
  31. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people follow the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Usherwood, S., & Startin, N. (2013). Euroscepticism as a persistent phenomenon. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van der Eijk, C. (2007). Multiple-item measurement: Why factor analysis is often inappropriate for mapping latent structure and what to do instead. Presentation prepared for IWHO Seminar, 16 May 2007.Google Scholar
  34. van Schuur, W. H. (2003). Mokken scale analysis: Between the Guttman scale and parametric item response theory. Political Analysis, 11(2), 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danilo Di Mauro
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vincenzo Memoli
    • 3
  1. 1.European University Institute (EUI) San Domenico di FiesoleFiesoleItaly
  2. 2.Unitelma Sapienza, University of RomeRomeItaly
  3. 3.Università degli Studi di CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations