Supporting Knowledge Work by Speech-Act Based Templates for Micro Processes

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 256)

Abstract

Speech acts have been proposed to improve the design of interactive systems for decades. Nevertheless, they have not yet made their way to common practice in software engineering or even process modeling. Various types of workflow management systems have been successful to support or even automate mostly predictable schema based process patterns without the explicit use of speech acts as design primitives. Yet, todays work is increasingly characterized by unpredictable collaborative processes, called knowledge work. Some types of knowledge work are supported by case management tools which typically provide regulated access to case-related information. But communicative acts are not supported sufficiently. Since knowledge workers are well aware of the pragmatic dimension of their communicative acts, we believe that bringing this awareness of the nature of a speech act to a case management tool will allow for better support of unregulated knowledge intensive processes. In this paper we propose a speech-act-based approach to improve the effectivity of knowledge work. We thereby enhance case management systems by making them aware of speech acts. Speech act related micro processes can then be used to prevent misunderstandings, increase process transparency and make useful inferences.

Keywords

Adaptive case management Speech Act Theory Knowledge-intensive business process Process template 

References

  1. 1.
    Auramäki, E., Lehtinen, E., Lyytinen, K.: A speech-act-based office modeling approach. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 6(2), 126–152 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Austin, J.L.: How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bider, I., Perjons, E.: Reviving language/action perspective in the era of social software: research in progress. In: Short Paper Proceedings of the 5th IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bisson, P., Stephenson, E., Viguerie, S.P.: The productivity imperative. McKinsey Q., June 2010Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davenport, T.H.: Rethinking knowledge work: a strategic approach. McKinsey Q. 1(11), 88–99 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: The deep structure of business processes. Commun. ACM 49(5), 58–64 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drucker, P.F.: Knowledge-worker productivity: the biggest challenge. Calif. Manag. Rev. 41(2), 79–94 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hisarciklilar, O., Boujut, J.F.: A speech act theory-based information model to support design communication through annotations. Comput. Ind. 60(7), 510–519 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kimbrough, S.O., Moore, S.A.: On automated message processing in electronic commerce and work support systems: speech act theory and expressive felicity. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 15(4), 321–367 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liskov, B.H., Wing, J.M.: A behavioral notion of subtyping. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 16(6), 1811–1841 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neumann, C.P., Lenz, R.: The alpha-flow approach to inter-institutional process support in healthcare. Int. J. Knowl. Based Organ. (IJKBO) 2(4), 52–68 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Object management group: case management model and notation (CMMN) (2014). http://www.omg.org/spec/CMMN/1.0
  14. 14.
    Schoop, M.: Habermas and searle in hospital: a description language for cooperative documentation systems in healthcare. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Communication Modeling - The Language/Action Perspective (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Searle, J.R.: A classification of illocutionary acts. Lang. Soc. 5, 1–23 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Swenson, K.D.: Workflow for the information worker. In: Fischer, F. (ed.) Workflow Handbook, pp. 39–49. Future Strategies, Lighthouse Point (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Swenson, K.D.: The nature of knowledge work. In: Swenson, K.D. (ed.) Mastering the Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize the Way that Knowledge Workers Get Things Done. Meghan-Kiffer Press, Tampa (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Swenson, K.D.: Robots don’t innovate - innovation vs automation in BPM, May 2015Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Der Aalst, W.M., Barthelmess, P., Ellis, C.A., Wainer, J.: Proclets: a framework for lightweight interacting workflow processes. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 10(04), 443–481 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Computer Science 6University of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations