Abstract
This chapter explores the airport as a new space for the exhibition and performance of cultural heritage, drawing on Zygmunt Bauman’s discussion of liquid modernity and John Urry’s mobilities paradigm. Suvarnabhumi Airport in Bangkok and Incheon Airport in Seoul each offer “heritage on the go” to their domestic and international tourists in the form of selective displays of iconic elements of national heritage. Acts of “heritage on the go” are a response to globalization’s hypermobility. The territorialized countries (Thailand, South Korea) undertake an abbreviated heritage scripting of their airports that is readily consumed and easily transported into new territories, for by virtue of being travel venues there is inadequate time for the tourist to more deeply engage the subject matter. “Heritage on the go” opens a new critical inquiry into tourism and heritage. It recognizes two interacting domains of heritage production—institutional actors and the tourists themselves—as makers, not just consumers of heritage. The “heritage on the go” concept can be applied to other officially sanctioned, elementally distilled, intended-to-be-rapidly-consumed performances or installations of heritage. Of particular interest is where these rapid displays take place and who authorizes them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Even the color scheme of the official airport logo—gold and blue—was chosen in consideration of cultural ideas. Gold is the symbol of prosperity in Thailand, reiterating the “Golden Land” or Suvarnabhumi and the prosperity intended for its modern-day descendant, the airport. Blue is the symbol of prudence, carefulness, and friendship, representing the ethos of the airport organization itself. The official promotional video of the airport can be watched at this url:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_vk-XohISU&feature=relmfu (last accessed 9 July 2014).
- 2.
Suvarnabhumi is outstanding but Singapore’s Changi Airport was ranked first in 2014 and 2015 followed by Korea’s Incheon Airport in the second position according to Skytrax’s World Airport Awards, whose decision is based on the participation of airline customers in a survey. (http://www.worldairportawards.com/Awards/airport_award_winners_2014.html; http://www.worldairportawards.com/Awards/world_airport_rating.html).
- 3.
The video can be watched at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpZxaCdYq-w (last accessed 9 July 2015).
- 4.
For this and the other KCHF quotes which follow, see http://www.airport.kr/iiacms/pageWork.iia?_scode=C2605010200 (last accessed 15 May 2015).
- 5.
See http://english.seoul.go.kr/gtk/news/reports_view.php?idx=1275 (last accessed 1 May 2015).
- 6.
See http://english.seoul.go.kr/gtk/news/reports_view.php?idx=1275 (last accessed 1 May 2015).
References
Augé, M. (1995). Non-places. Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London: Verso.
Bagnall, G. (2003). Performance and performativity at heritage sites. Museum and Society, 1(2), 87–103.
Bale, M. T. (2008). Archaeological heritage management in South Korea: The Nam River dam project. In M. E. Byington (Ed.), Early Korea. Reconsidering early Korean history through archaeology (pp. 213–233). Cambridge: Early Korea Project, Korea Institute, Harvard University.
Bauman, Z. (1996). Tourists and vagabonds. Heroes and victims of postmodernity. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
Bauman, Z. (2003). The tourist syndrome. An interview with Zygmunt Bauman. Tourist Studies, 3(2), 205–217.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bruegmann, R. (1996). Airport city. In J. Zukowsky (Ed.), Building for air travel: Architecture and design for commercial aviation (pp. 195–211). Munich: Prestel.
Byrne, D. (2009). A critique of unfeeling heritage. In L. Smith & N. Akagawa (Eds.), Intangible heritage (pp. 229–252). London: Routledge.
Clark, O. (2011, May 12). Cultureport. Airport World. Retrieved June 29, 2013, from http://www.airport-world.com/home/item/580-cultureport.
Cwerner, S., Kesselring, S., & Urry, J. (Eds.). (2009). Aeromobilities. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias. Diacritics, 16, 22–27.
Gottdiener, M. (2000). Life in the air. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Halbertsma, M. (2011). Introduction. In M. Halbertsma, A. van Stipriaan, & P. van Ulzen (Eds.), The heritage theatre. Globalisation and cultural heritage (pp. 1–25). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (2013). The (de-)centering spaces of airports: Framing mobility and multilingualism. In S. Pietikäinen & H. Kelly-Holmes (Eds.), Multilingualism and the periphery (pp. 154–198). New York: Oxford University Press.
Keyes, C. F. (1967). Isan: Regionalism in northeastern Thailand (Thailand Project, Interim Reports Series, Vol. 10). Ithaca: Cornell University, Department of Asian Studies, Southeast Asia Program.
Korea Cultural Heritage Foundation (KCHF). (2009). Request from an NGO for accreditation. Form ICH-09-2008-EN-ver-01.
Lai, C.-L. (2004). Art exhibitions travel the world. In M. Sheller & J. Urry (Eds.), Tourism mobilities: Places to play, places in play (pp. 90–102). London: Routledge.
Lloyd, J. (2003). Dwelltime. Airport technology, travel and consumption. Space and Culture, 6(2), 93–109.
Lury, C. (1997). The objects of travel. In C. Rojek & J. Urry (Eds.), Touring cultures. Transformations of travel and theory (pp. 75–95). London: Routledge.
Miksic, J. (2010). The A to Z of ancient southeast Asia. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
Pai, H. I. (2000). Constructing “Korean” origins: A critical review of archaeology, historiography and racial myth in Korean state-formation theories. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.
Pascoe, D. (2004). Airspaces. London: Reaktion.
Peleggi, M. (2007). Thailand. The worldly kingdom. London: Reaktion.
Picard, D. (2012). Tourism, awe and inner journeys. In D. Picard & M. Robinson (Eds.), Emotion in motion. Tourism, affect and transformation (pp. 1–20). Farnham: Ashgate.
Picard, D., & Robinson, M. (Eds.). (2012). Emotion in motion. Tourism, affect and transformation. Farnham: Ashgate.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.
Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). London: Sage.
Schwarzer, M. (2001, May/June). Now boarding: Airport museums and the global audience. Museum News. Retrieved November 8, 2013, from http://museumplanner.org/now-boarding-airport-museums-and-the-global-audience/.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2004a). Places to play, places in play. In M. Sheller & J. Urry (Eds.), Tourism mobilities. Places to play, places in play (pp. 1–10). London: Routledge.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (Eds.). (2004b). Tourism mobilities. Places to play, places in play. London: Routledge.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38, 207–226.
Silverman, H. (2011). Border wars: The ongoing temple dispute between Thailand and Cambodia and UNESCO’s World Heritage List. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 17(1), 1–21.
Smith, J. Z. (1987). To take place. Toward theory in ritual. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. London: Routledge.
Smith, L. (2011). Affect and registers of engagement. Navigating emotional responses to dissonant heritages. In L. Smith, G. Cubitt, R. Wilson, & K. Fouseki (Eds.), Representing enslavement and abolition in museums: Ambiguous engagements (pp. 260–303). London: Routledge.
Steiner, C. J., & Reisinger, Y. (2006). Understanding existential authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(2), 299–318.
Streckfuss, D. (2011). Truth on trial in Thailand. London: Routledge.
Turner, V. (1967). Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites de passage. In The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
Van Ulzen, P. (2011). International airports as stages for national cultural heritage: The case of Schiphol Airport, The Netherlands. In M. Halbertsma, A. van Stipriaan, & P. van Ulzen (Eds.), The heritage theatre: Globalisation and cultural heritage (pp. 93–12). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Watson, S., Waterton, E., & Smith, L. (2012). Moments, instances and experiences. In L. Smith, E. Waterton, & S. Watson (Eds.), The cultural moment in tourism (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.
Acknowledgments
As always, I am indebted to the generosity of my colleague, Alexandra Denes, in all matters pertaining to Thailand. I also thank Robyn Bushell, William Logan, Russell Staiff, and Emma Waterton for their suggestions on an early version of this chapter. I am solely responsible for its final form.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Silverman, H. (2017). Heritage on the Go: Abbreviated Heritage in a Mobile World. In: Silverman, H., Waterton, E., Watson, S. (eds) Heritage in Action. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42870-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42870-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42868-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42870-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)