Advertisement

Mandatory Workplace Mediation

  • Virginia Vilches Such
  • Alain Laurent VerbekeEmail author
  • Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Chapter
Part of the Industrial Relations & Conflict Management book series (IRCM)

Abstract

Mediation has found an entrance in the agenda of policy makers and dispute system designers for several reasons, including its claim to improve access to justice. Yet, there are still many questions regarding the type of conflicts that is really suited to be mediated, and how to design mediation systems capable of delivering the benefits claimed. In fact, the perfect recipe to design an effective and satisfactory mediation system has not been found yet. The challenge is big: how can mediation deliver fairness and justice? For a comprehensive response, we need insights and perspectives from multiple disciplines. Currently, Dispute System Design arises as a new research area that studies conflict from a variety of perspectives (psychology, sociology, law, economics, etc.).

Keywords

European Union Collective Bargaining Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution Mediation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. ACAS. (2015). Conciliation explained. Available at: http://www.ACAS.org.uk/media/pdf/o/g/Conciliation-Explained-ACAS.pdf. Last accessed on 9 Mar 2016.
  2. ACAS. (2016). Collective disputes. http://www.ACAS.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=2012. Last accessed on 9 Mar 2016.
  3. Arastey, M. L. (2014). La Mediación en las Relaciones Laborales: Reflexiones para un Futuro de Salud Laboral y Organizacional. In Mediación es Justicia. El impacto de la Ley 5/2012 de Mediación Civil y Mercantil. (1st ed., p. 463). Barcelona: Huygens Editorial.Google Scholar
  4. Barendrecht, M. (2010). Legal aid, accessible courts or legal information? Three access to justice strategies compared (November 10, 2010), 12. TISCO Working Paper Series on Civil Law and Conflict Resolution Systems No. 010/2010; Tilburg Law School Research Paper No. 24/2010; Global Jurist, Vol. 11, Issue 1, January 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1706825
  5. Barendrecht, M., Kamminga, P., & Verdonschot, J. H. (2008). Priorities for the justice system: Responding to the most urgent legal problems of individuals (March 2008), 37. TISCO Working Paper No. 001/2008; Tilburg University Legal Studies Working Paper No. 002/2008; TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2008–011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1090885 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1090885
  6. Barrett, J. (1995). The origin of mediation: The United States conciliation dervice in the U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from: http://mediationhistory.org/fmcs01/publication/the-origin-of-mediation-the-united-states-conciliation-service-inthe-u-s-department-of-labor/
  7. Barret, J. (2000). A brief history to the DOLs conciliation service. Retrieved from: http://mediationhistory.org/fmcs01/wpcontent/uploads/2015/02/BriefHistoryofDOL.pdf.Google Scholar
  8. Barrett, J. (2014). The future of alternative dispute resolution. Retrieved from: www.mediate.com/articles/BarrettFuture.cfm
  9. Blomgren et al. (2009). Dispute system design and justice in employment dispute resolution: Mediation at the workplace. Harvard Law Review, 14(1), 1–50.Google Scholar
  10. Bollen, K., & Euwema, M. (2013). Workplace mediation: An underdeveloped research area. Negotiation Journal, 29(3), 329–353. http://doi.org/  10.1111/nejo.12028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bollen, K., Ittner, H., & Euwema, M. C. (2012). Mediating hierarchical labor conflicts: Procedural justice makes a difference-for subordinates. Group Decision and Negotiation, 21(5), 621–636. http://doi.org/  10.1007/s10726-011-9230-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bond, C. A. (1997). Shattering the myth: Mediating sexual harassment disputes in the workplace. Fordham Law Review, 65(6), 2489–2533.Google Scholar
  13. Brett, J., Barsness, Z., & Goldberg, S. (1996). The effectiveness of mediation: An independent analysis of cases handled by four major service providers. Negotiation Journal, 12, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brim, R. (2001). Talks replacing torts in workplace conflict; more businesses relying on mediation. Lexington: Herald-Leader.Google Scholar
  15. Butt. T., Munduate, L., Barón, M., & Medina, F. J. (2005). Intervenciones en Mediación. En L. Munduate, y F.J. Medina (Coord.), Gestión del Conflicto, Negociación y Mediación (pp. 265–303).Google Scholar
  16. Canvas Martinez, F. (2007). Las Comisiones Paritarias y la solución de los conflictos laborales derivados de la interpretación y aplicación del convenio colectivo [Comisiones Paritarias and resolution of labor conflicts derived from the interpretation and application of the collective agreement]. Revista del Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, Sevilla, 115–135, 91.Google Scholar
  17. Cowl -v- Plymouth City Council. (2001). EWCA Civ 1935 (Eng.)Google Scholar
  18. Cruz Villalón, J. (2003). Por el ensanchamiento de la mediación y el arbitraje en los conflictos laborales [On the spread of mediation and arbitration in labour conflicts]. Revista Andaluza de Trabajo y Bienestar Social (12–19). Google Scholar
  19. Department of Business Innovation and Skills. (2011). Resolving workplace disputes: Government response to the consultation (United Kingdom). Retrieved from: http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/employment-matters/docs/r/11-1365-resolving-workplace-disputes-government-response.pdf
  20. De Palo, & Canessa. (2014). Sleeping? Comatose? Only mandatory consideration of mediation can awake the sleeping beauty in the European Union, Jed. D Melnik Annual Symposium. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, 16, 713–730.Google Scholar
  21. De Roo, A., & Jagtenberg, R. (1994). Settling labour disputes in Europe. Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. De Roo, A., & Jagtengbert, R. (2003). Settling labour disputes in Europe. Netherlands: The Society for Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  23. Dolder, C. (2004). The contribution of mediation to workplace justice. Industrial Law Journal, 33(4), 320–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. EC. (2002). Green paper on alternative dispute resolution in civil and commercial law /*COM/2002/0196 final*. Retrieved from: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52002DC0196:EN:HTML
  25. EP. (2014). Rebooting the mediation directive: Assessing the limited impact of its implementation and proposing measures to increase the number of mediations in the EU. Retrieved from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2014/493042/IPOL-JURI_ET(2014)493042_EN.pdf
  26. Equal Employment Opportunity Commissión. EECO at 50. www.fmcs.gov/aboutus/our-history/. Last accessed at: 3 Mar 2016.
  27. European Courts of Human Rights. (2013). Guide on article 6: Right to a fair trial. Acailable at: http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_6_ENG.pdf
  28. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. www.fmcs.gov/aboutus/our-history/. Last accessed on: 3 Mar 2016.
  29. Fox, S., & Stallworth, L. E. (2009). Building a framework for two internal organizational approaches to resolving and preventing workplace bullying: Alternative dispute resolution and training. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 61(3), 220–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fuller, L. (1954). American legal philosophy at mid-century. Journal of Legal Education, 6, 457–477.Google Scholar
  31. Fuller, L. (1971). Mediation. Its forms and functions. South California Law Review, 44, 305–309.Google Scholar
  32. Ginebra, E. & Tarabal, J. (2014). Mediación Obligatoria e Inducción a la Mediación. In Mediación es Justicia. El impacto de la Ley 5/2012 de Mediación Civil y Mercantil. (1o ed., p. 463). Barcelona: Huygens Editorial.Google Scholar
  33. ILO. (1998). Manual de Mediación, Ginebra. Retreived from, http://cemical.diba.cat/publicacions/fitxers/manual_mediacion_OIT.PDF.Google Scholar
  34. Kessler, G. & Finkelstein, L. J. (1988). The evolution of a multi-door courthouse. Catholic University Law Review, 37(3), 577–590.Google Scholar
  35. Kokott, J. (2009). Opinion of the advocate general Kokkot delivered on 10 November 2009. Cases C-317/18 to C-320/08. Retrieved from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:62008CC0317&from=EN
  36. Ley 36/2011 Reguladora de la jurisdicción social (Social Jurisdiction Act 36/2011) Spain, Boletín Oficial del Estado, 11.10.2011.Google Scholar
  37. Macho, C. (2014). Origen y Evolución de la Mediación: el Nacimiento del Movimiento ADR en EEUU y su expansión por Europa. ADC, tomo LXvII, fasc. III. 931–996.Google Scholar
  38. Marshall, T. F. (1998). Restorative justice: An overview. Minneapolis: Cent. Restorative Justice, Peacemaking.Google Scholar
  39. Martinez-Pecino, R., Munduate, L., & Medina, F., (2005). Effectiveness of mediation strategies in rights conflicts and conflicts of interests. IACM 18th annual conference. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=735086
  40. Marzocco, A. M., & Nino, M. (2012). The EU Directive on mediation in civil and commercial matters and the principle of effective judicial protection. Lex et Scientia, XIX(2), 105–127.Google Scholar
  41. McCabe. D., (1917). Federal intervention in labour disputes under the Erdman, Newlands and Adamsom Acts. In Proceedings of the Academy of Polítical Scienci in the City of New York (vol 7). N° 1 Labor Disputes and Puclic Services Corporation. (94–107). Academy of Political Science. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1171718
  42. McDermott, E. P., & Ervin, D. (2005). The influence of procedural and distributive variables on settlement rates in employment discrimination mediation. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 1, 45–60.Google Scholar
  43. Menkel-Meadow, C. (2002). When litigation is not the only way: Consensus building and mediation as public interest lawyering. Journal of Law & Policy, 10, 37–61.Google Scholar
  44. Menkel-Meadow, C. (2006). Peace and justice: Notes on the evolution and purposes of legal processes. Georgetown Law Journal, 94(2), 553–580.Google Scholar
  45. Menkel-Meadow, C. (2007). Restorative justice: What is it and does it work? Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 161–187.Google Scholar
  46. Menkel-Meadow, C. (2009). Empirical studies of ADR: The Baseline problem of what ADR is and what it is compared to. In (Peter Cane and Herbert Kritzer, editors, forthcoming) Oxford handbook of empirical legal studies. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228139673_Empirical_Studies_of_ADR_The_Baseline_Problem_of_What_ADR_is_and_What_it_is_Compared_to?enrichId=rgreq-bd5a15259a2385c24185ab32d3d3d4ec-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODEzOTY3MztBUzoyODk1NTc1NDQyMjY4MTlAMTQ0NjA0NzMwNjkxMQ%3D%3D&el=1_x_
  47. Menkel-Meadow, C. (2011). The NRLA’s legacy: Collective or individual dispute resolution or not? Journal of the ABA Section of Labor & Employment Law, 26(2), 249–266.Google Scholar
  48. Menkel-Meadow, C. (2015a). Variations in the uptake of and resistance to mediation outside of the United States. In Contemporary issues in international arbitration and mediation. The Fordham Papers 2014, Leiden, Brill, 2015, 189–221.Google Scholar
  49. Menkel-Meadow, C. (2015b). Process pluralism in transitional/restorative justice. International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, 3(1), 3–32.Google Scholar
  50. Mnookin, R., Peppet, S., & Tulumello, A. (2000). Beyond winning: Negotiating to create value in deals and disputes (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Nabatchi, T., & Bingham, L. B. (2000). Transformative mediation in the USPS Redress Program:Observations of ADR specialistst. Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal, 18, 399–427.Google Scholar
  52. Nolan-Haley, J. (2012). Is Europe heading down the primrose path with mandatory mediation? Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation, 37, 981–1011.Google Scholar
  53. Olea, M., & Rodríguez-Sañudo, F. (2010). Spain. En International encyclopaedia for labour law and industrial relations (47–112). The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International BV.Google Scholar
  54. Oser, J. (2004–2005). The unguided use of internal ADR programs to resolve sexual harassment controversies in the workplace. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6, 283–312.Google Scholar
  55. Real Decreto Legislativo 2/2015, de 23 de octubre, por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley del Estatuto de los Trabajadores. Boletín Oficial del Estado 255, sec 1; pag 100224–100308.Google Scholar
  56. Rodríguez-Piñero, M. (2003). Indisponibilidad de los Derechos y Conciliación en las Relaciones Laborales (Non-disposability of rights and conciliation in labor relations), Revista Andaluza de Trabajo y Bienestar Social, 25, 23–42.Google Scholar
  57. Rogers, N., & McEwen, C. (1997). Employing the law to increase the use of mediation and to encourage direct early negotiations. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 831–864. Google Scholar
  58. Rome, D. L. (2003). A guide to business-to-business mediation. Dispute Resolution Journal, 57(4), 51–59.Google Scholar
  59. Sander, F. (1979). Varieties of dispute processing. In A. Levin & R. Wheeler (Eds.), The pound conference: Perspectives on justice in the future. West Publisher Group, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  60. Shaw, W., Hong, Q.-N., Pransky, G., & Loisel, P. (2008). A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent work- place disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18(1), 2–15.Google Scholar
  61. Soleto, H. (2011). La Mediación Vinculada a los Tribunales. In Mediación y Resolución de Conflictos: Técnicas y Ámbitos. (245–267). Madrid: Tecnos.Google Scholar
  62. Schiavetta, S, (2004). The relationship between e-ADR and article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights pursuant to the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Journal of Information Law and Technology, 1. Retrieved from: https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2004_1/schiavetta/.
  63. Stallworth, L., & Kaspar, D. (2013). Employing the law to provide “early access” to integrated conflict management systems and ADR processes: The proposed national employment dispute resolution Act (NEDRA). Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution. http://cemical.diba.cat/publicacions/fitxers/manual_mediacion_OIT.PDF
  64. Tascón López, (2009). La solución extrajudicial de conflictos laborales en el modelo español: a medio camino entre el desiderándum legal y el ostracismo social (Extrajudicial conflict resolution for labor disputes in the Spanish Model). Revista universitaria de ciencias del trabajo, 209–226.Google Scholar
  65. Tyler, B. (2003). A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a “fair” process. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 747–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Valdés, F. (2003). Conciliación, Mediación y Arbitraje en los Países de la Unión Europea. (S. G. de P. M. de T. y A. Sociales, Ed.) (1o ed.). Madrid: Subdireccion General de Publicaciones Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales.Google Scholar
  67. Verbeke, A. (2009). Mediation. Faciliteren van onderhandelingen. In Reflectie op mediation (pp. 27–46). Maklu: Antwerp.Google Scholar
  68. Wissler, R. (1997). The effects of mandatory mediation: Empirical research on the experience of small claims and common please courts. Willmate Law Review, 576–577.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virginia Vilches Such
    • 1
  • Alain Laurent Verbeke
    • 2
    Email author
  • Carrie Menkel-Meadow
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.University of SevilleSevilleSpain
  2. 2.Faculty of LawUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.UC Irvine School of LawIrvineUSA
  4. 4.Georgetown LawWashington DCUSA

Personalised recommendations