Advertisement

Workplace Mediation: Searching for Underlying Motives and Interests

  • Elisabeth KalsEmail author
  • Kathrin Thiel
  • Susanne Freund
Chapter
Part of the Industrial Relations & Conflict Management book series (IRCM)

Abstract

This chapter argues and illustrates with a case study that an efficient mediation of a conflict between two or more conflict partners should be based on the analysis of the underlying structure of the conflict. This underlying deep structure of the conflict is formed of unfulfilled motives and wishes. One of these crucial hidden aspects is the experience of injustice. We assume that only by taking into account the underlying motives and practicing a communication of mutual understanding, the core (or “deep structure”) of the conflict can be fully understood and sustainably solved. This is essential both for economical and non-monetary issues. This chapter is based on a theoretical perspective of social conflicts, however it also offers practical support as well as references to methods for the practice of workplace mediation.

Keywords

Procedural Justice Leadership Style Social Conflict Conflict Situation Mediation Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1975). The structure of magic: A book about language and therapy. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, R. A. (1988). Attributions and organizational conflict: The mediating role of apparent sincerity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bless, H., Fiedler, K., & Strack, F. (2004). Social cognition. How individuals construct social reality. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bollen, K., & Euwema, M. (2013). Workplace mediation: An underdeveloped research area. Negotiation Journal, 29(3), 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bollen, K., Ittner, H., & Euwema, M. (2012). Mediating hierarchical labor conflicts: Procedural justice makes a difference – for subordinates. Group Decision & Negotiation, 21(5), 621–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bush, R. A. B., & Folger, J. P. (2005). The promise of mediation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Bush, R. A. B., & Pope, S. G. (2002). Changing the quality of conflict interaction: The principles and practice of transformative mediation. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 3(1), 67–96.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. The Economic Journal, 104(424), 648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CPP Inc. (2008). Workplace conflict and how businesses can harness it to thrive. Mountain View.Google Scholar
  10. De Dreu, C. K. W. (2008). The virtue and vice of workplace conflict: Food for (pessimistic) thought. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Dreu, C., & Van de Vliert, E. (Eds.). (1997). Using conflict for organization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Deutsch, M. (2006). Justice and conflict. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. C. Marcus (Eds.), Handbook of conflict resolution (pp. 43–68). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Euwema, M., Beetz, J., Driessen, S., & Menke, R. (2007). Wat kost een arbeidsconflict? Forum voor conflictmanagement, 30(6), 7–12.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Goldberg, S. B., Sander, F. E. A., Rogers, N. H., & Cole, S. R. (2007). Dispute resolution. New York: Aspen.Google Scholar
  16. Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 235–256). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hoskins, M. L., & Stoltz, J. M. (2003). Balancing on words: Human change processes in mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 20(3), 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jahn, M. (2014). Konfliktkosten im Rahmen von BGM und BGF. In S. Hahnzog (Ed.), Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung (pp. 75–82). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jandackova, V. K., & Jackowska, M. (2015). Low heart rate variability in unemployed men: The possible mediating effects of life satisfaction. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 20(5), 530–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kals, E., & Ittner, H. (2008). Wirtschaftsmediation. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  22. Kals, E., & Kärcher, J. (2001). Mythen in der Wirtschaftsmediation. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 2, 17–27.Google Scholar
  23. Kals, E., & Maes, J. (Eds.). (2012). Justice and conflicts. Theoretical and empirical contributions. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Kals, E., Müller, M., & Maes, J. (2002). Aufklärung hilft! – Mediation kommunalpolitischer Konflikte. Psychologie in Österreich, 5, 227–232.Google Scholar
  25. Kannheiser, W. (1992). Arbeit und Emotion. München: Quintessenz.Google Scholar
  26. KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft. (2009). Konfliktkostenstudie: Die Kosten von Reibungsverlusten in Industrieunternehmen. Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  27. Kressel, K., & Pruitt, D. G. (Eds.). (1989). Mediation research: The process and effectiveness of third-party intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Lazarus, R. S., Averill, J. R., & Opton, E. M., Jr. (1970). Toward a cognitive theory of emotion. In M. B. Arnold (Ed.), Feelings and emotions (pp. 207–232). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maes, J., & Schmitt, M. (2004). Gerechtigkeit und Gerechtigkeitspsychologie. In G. Sommer & A. Fuchs (Eds.), Krieg und Frieden. Handbuch der Konflikt- und Friedenspsychologie (pp. 182–194). Beltz: Weinheim.Google Scholar
  31. McKenzie, D. M. (2015). The role of mediation in resolving workplace relationship conflict. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 39, 52–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mikula, G., & Wenzel, M. (2000). Justice and social conflicts. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, D. T., & Ratner, R. K. (1996). The power of the myth of self-interest. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 25–48). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Montada, L. (1998). Justice: Just a rational choice? Social Justice Research, 11(2), 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Montada, L. (2003). Justice, equity, and fairness in human relations. In J. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 5 (Volume Editors: Th. Millon, & M. J. Lerner) (pp. 537–568). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Montada, L., & Kals, E. (2013). Mediation. Psychologische Grundlagen und Perspektiven. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  37. Müller-Wolf, H.-M. (1994). Mediation von Konflikten und kritischen Prozessen in der beruflichen Praxis. Gruppendynamik, 25(3), 253–272.Google Scholar
  38. Nabatchi, T., Bingham, L., & Good, D. H. (2007). Organizational justice and workplace mediation: A six factor model. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18(2), 148–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nebsit, B., Nabatchi, T., & Bingham, L. B. (2012). Employees, supervisors, and workplace mediation: Experiences of justice and settlement. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(3), 260–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ohbuchi, K. I., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1997). Multiple goals and tactical behaviors in social conflicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(24), 2177–2199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (2003). Negotiation in social conflict. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (2004). Social conflict. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  43. Rogers, C. R. (2003). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  44. Rooney, G. (2007). The use of intuition in mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 25(2), 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenberg, M. B. (2003). Nonviolent communication: A language of life. Encinitas: PuddleDancer.Google Scholar
  46. Schulz von Thun, T. (2008). Six tools for clear communication. Hamburg: Institut für Kommunikation.Google Scholar
  47. Wall, A., & Dunne, T. C. (2012). Mediation research: A current review. Negotiation Journal, 28(2), 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (2014). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  49. Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Winkelmann, R. (2009). Unemployment, social capital, and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zartman, I. W., Druckman, D., Jensen, L., Pruitt, D. G., & Young, P. (1996). Negotiation as a search for justice. International Negotiation, 1, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Catholic University of Eichstätt-IngolstadtEichstättGermany

Personalised recommendations