Advertisement

It Takes Three to Tango: The Geometry of Workplace Mediation

  • Lourdes MunduateEmail author
  • Katalien Bollen
  • Martin Euwema
Chapter
Part of the Industrial Relations & Conflict Management book series (IRCM)

Abstract

During recent years, there has been a growing interest in the field of employment relations in the use of mediation as an important way to resolve disputes in the workplace. This interest reflects the changing nature of ‘the social contract’ between employer and employees which focuses more on individualised labor relations, or i-deals. This is in line with the shift from formal and confrontational dispute resolution to more ‘interest-based’ conflict management systems in organizations in which primary attention is paid to underlying interests, needs and wishes of parties instead of collective rules. In this discussion chapter, we address first the developments in the field of workplace mediation and its relation to the changing nature of employment relations. In doing so, we refer to social exchange theory. Second, in order to assess the effectiveness of mediation, we build further on the “geometry of workplace mediation’’ already introduced in the first chapter of this handbook. The geometry resulting from the combination of the 3 dimensions (regulations, roles and relations) as described by the 3R-model is well situated as a conflict management and resolution system for the promotion of efficiency, equity and voice standards, and provides a contingent approach to the design of optimal and effective workplace mediation systems depending on the specific society, industry and organization.

Keywords

Industrial Relation Dispute Resolution Conflict Management Employment Relation Dispute Resolution Alternative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, G. (2001). Labour’s labour law: Labour law reform in New Zealand under a labour government. London: Institute of Employment Rights.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, T. (2013). Workplace mediation and the empowerment of disputants: Rhetoric or reality? Industrial Relations Journal, 44(2), 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, T. (2014). The role of workplace mediation: A critical assessment. Personnel Review, 43(5), 764–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bingham, L. (2004). Employment dispute resolution: The case for mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 22(1–2), 145–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BIS. (2012). Regional-mediation-pilot-schemes-up-and-running. London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills. Available at: http://news.bis.gov.uk/Press-Releases/Regional-Mediation-Pilot-Schemes-up-and-running-67b90.aspx.Google Scholar
  6. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Bollen, K., & Euwema, M. (2013a). Workplace mediation: An underdeveloped research area. Negotiation Journal, 29(3), 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bollen, K., & Euwema, M. (2013b). The role of hierarchy in face-to-face and e-supported mediations: The use of an online intake to balance hierarchy. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 6(4), 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bollen, K., & Euwema, M. (2015). Angry at your boss: Who cares? Anger recognition and mediation effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 256–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bollen, K., Euwema, M., & Müller, P. (2010). Why are subordinates less satisfied with mediation? The role of uncertainty. Negotiation Journal, 26(4), 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bollen, K. N., Verbeke, A. L., & Euwema, M. C. (2014). Computers work for women: Gender differences in supported divorce mediation. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boxall, P. (2014). The future of employment relations from the perspective of human resource management. Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(4), 578–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Branch, S., Ramsay, S., & Barker, M. (2009). Workplace bullying. In T. Redman & A. Wilkinson (Eds.), Contemporary human resource management (3rd ed., pp. 517–541). Harlow: FT Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Brett, J., & Goldberg, S. (1983). Grievance mediation in the coal industry: A field experiment. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37(1), 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Budd, J. W. (2004). Employment with a human face: Balancing efficiency, equity, and voice. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Budd, J., & Colvin, A. (2008). Improved metrics for workplace dispute resolution procedures: Efficiency, equity, and voice. Industrial Relations, 47(3), 460–479.Google Scholar
  17. Budd, J. W., & Colvin, A. J. (2014). The goals and assumptions of conflict management in organizations. In The Oxford handbook of conflict management in organizations, 12.Google Scholar
  18. Conlon, D. E., & Ross, W. H. (1993). The effects of partisan third parties on negotiator behavior and outcome perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corby, S. (1999). Resolving employment rights through mediation: The New Zealand experience. London: Institute of Employment Rights.Google Scholar
  20. Costantino, C. (1996). Using interest-based techniques to design conflict management systems. Negotiation Journal, 12(3), 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Costantino, C., & Strickles Merchant, C. (1996). How to design conflict management systems. CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution, 14(4), 48–49.Google Scholar
  22. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., & Conway, N. (2004). The employment relationship through the lens of social exchange. In J. Coyle-Shapiro, L. M. Shore, S. Taylor, & L. Tetrick (Eds.), The employment relationship: Examining psychological and conceptual perspectives (pp. 5–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2005). Self-interest: Defining and understanding a human motive. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 985–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davey, B., & Dix, G. (2011). The dispute resolution regulations two years on: The ACAS experience (ACAS paper no. 7/11). London: ACAS Publication.Google Scholar
  25. De Palo, G., Feasley, A., & Orecchini, F. (2011). Quantifying the cost of not using mediation – a data analysis. Brussels: European Parliament, Directorate General For Internal Policies.Google Scholar
  26. Dhiaulhaq, A., Gritten, D., De Bruyn, T., Yasmi, Y., Zazali, A., & Silalahi, M. (2014). Transforming conflicts in plantations through mediation: Lessons and experiences from Sumatra, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 41, 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dolder, C. (2004). The contribution of mediation to workplace justice. Industrial Law Journal, 33(4), 320–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garcia, A., Pender, E., & Elgoibar, P. (2016). The state of art: Trust and conflict management in organizational industrial relations. In P. Elgoibar, M. Euwema, & L. Munduate (Eds.), Building trust and constructive conflict management in organizations. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. Gelfand, M. J., Leslie, L. M., Keller, K., & de Dreu, C. (2012). Conflict cultures in organizations: How leaders shape conflict cultures and their organizational-level consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1131–1147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldberg, S. (2005). How interest based grievance mediation performs in the long term. Dispute Resolution Journal, 60(4), 8–15.Google Scholar
  31. Goldman, B. M., Cropanzano, R., Stein, J. H., Shapiro, D. L., Thatcher, S., & Ko, J. (2008). The role of ideology in mediated disputes at work: A justice perspective. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(3), 210–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guest, D. E. (2004). The psychology of the employment relationship: An analysis based on the psychological contract. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guest, D. (2016). Trust and the role of the psychological contract in contemporary employment relations. In P. Elgoibar, M. Euwema, & L. Munduate (Eds.), Building trust and constructive conflict management in organizations. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. Hyman, R. (2001). Understanding European Trade Unionism: Between market, class and society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Karambayya, R., Brett, J., & Lytle, J. (1992). Effects of formal authority and experience on third-party roles, outcomes, and perceptions of fairness. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 426–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Keashly, L., & Nowell, B. (2011). Conflict, conflict resolution and bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Development in theory, research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 423–445). Bora Raton: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  37. Kolb, D. M. (1986). Who are organizational third parties and what do they do? In R. J. Latreille, P. L. (2010). Mediating workplace conflict of success, failure and fragility. ACAS Research Paper, 13/11.Google Scholar
  38. Kressel, K. (2014). The mediation of conflict: Context, cognition, and practice. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (3rd ed., pp. 817–848). San Francisco: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
  39. Lewicki, R. J., & Sheppard, B. H. (1985). Choosing how to intervene: Factors affecting the use of process and outcome control in third-party resolution. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 6, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lewicki, R., Elgoibar, P., & Euwema, M. (2016). The tree of trust: Building and repairing trust in organizations. In P. Elgoibar, M. Euwema, & L. Munduate (Eds.), Building trust and constructive conflict management in organizations. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  41. Macneil, J., & Bray, M. (2013). Third-party facilitators in interest-based negotiation: An Australian case study. Journal of Industrial Relations, 35, 699–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mareschal, P. M. (2005). What makes mediation work? Mediators’ perspectives on resolving disputes. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 44(3), 509–517.Google Scholar
  43. Munduate, L., Euwema, M., & Elgoibar, P. (Eds.). (2012). Ten steps for empowering employee representatives in the New European industrial relations: New European industrial relations NEIRE handbook. Aravaca: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  44. Munduate, L., Euwema, M., & Elgoibar, P. (2016). Constructive conflict management in organizations: Taking stock and looking forward. In P. Elgoibar, M. Euwema, & L. Munduate (Eds.), Building trust and constructive conflict management in organizations. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  45. Poitras, J., & Le Tareau, A. (2009). Quantifying the quality of mediation agreements. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 2(4), 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ridley-Duff, R., & Bennett, A. (2011). Towards mediation: Developing a theoretical framework to understand alternative dispute resolution. Industrial Relations Journal, 42(2), 106–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodríguez-Piñero, M., Del Rey, S., & Munduate, L. (1993). The intervention of third parties in the solution of labour conflicts. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 3(4), 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rousseau, D. M. (2005). I-deals, Ideosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  49. Sanders, A. (2009). Part one of the Employment Act 2008: ‘better’ dispute resolution? Industrial Law Journal, 38(1), 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shapiro, D. L., & Brett, J. M. (1993). Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1167–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shore, L. M., Tetrix, L. E., Lynch, P., & Barksdale, K. (2006). Social and economic exchange: Construct development and validation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 837–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ury, W. L., Brett, J. M., & Goldberg, S. B. (1993). Getting disputes resolved. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lourdes Munduate
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katalien Bollen
    • 2
  • Martin Euwema
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of SevilleSevilleSpain
  2. 2.Department of Educational Research and DevelopmentMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations