Advertisement

Performance Evaluation of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks for Rapid Response Traffic Information Delivery

  • Isaac J. Cushman
  • Danda B. Rawat
  • Lei Chen
  • Qing Yang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9798)

Abstract

Vehicular transportation has received rapid growth in many areas thanks to the increase in population density and massive city expansion. Such advancement however leads to the loss of time, money and human lives due to many reasons including driver distraction and serious roadway conditions. Recent trends have shown improvement of vehicular safety on account of design and manufacturing innovations such as additional airbags and pre-collision detection and warning using sensors. Nonetheless, the national averages of fatality, injuries, and property damages due to roadway vehicular crashes still remain at high levels. For the purpose of saving lives, reducing fuel costs and travel time on road, it is demanded to have a vehicular communication system that rapidly learns about the environment and promptly respond and notify drivers for decision making. Our research in this paper aims to design a system that utilizes the communications among vehicles in a Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET) and roadside infrastructure-based devices. Our design and analysis indicate that such system can be applied to assist drivers in adjusting their driving for better safety and making route decisions to save time and fuel costs.

Keywords

Relative Speed Vehicle Density Road Side Unit Vehicular Communication Dedicate Short Range Communication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Traffic Safety Facts, 1st edn. NHTSA’s National Center for Statistics and Analysis, Washington (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lomax, T., Schrank, D., Eisele, B.: Urban Mobility Scorecard, 1st edn. The Texas A&M Transportation Institute and INRIX, Kirkland (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Azogu, I., Ferreira, M., Larcom, J., Liu, H.: A new anti-jamming strategy for VANET metrics-directed security defense. IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Das, D., Misra, R.: Efficient vehicle to vehicle communication protocol for VANET. Recent Advances in Engineering and Computational Sciences (RAECS) (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, L., Tang, H., Wang, J.: Analysis of VANET security based on routing protocol information. In: Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Control and Information Processing (ICICIP) (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Monteiro, R., Sargento, S., Viriyasitavat, W., Tonguz, O.: Improving VANET protocols via network science. In: IEEE Vehicular Network Conference (VNC) (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shao, C., Leng, S., Zhang, Y., Vinel, A., Jonsson, M.: Analysis of connectivity probability in platoon-based vehicular Ad Hoc networks. In: International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isaac J. Cushman
    • 1
  • Danda B. Rawat
    • 1
  • Lei Chen
    • 1
  • Qing Yang
    • 2
  1. 1.Georgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA
  2. 2.Montana State UniversityBozemanUSA

Personalised recommendations