Skip to main content

Information Sharing in Multinational Peacekeeping Operations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 746 Accesses

Abstract

Information sharing can be difficult in multinational coalitions because different cultures introduce different languages, norms, national interests, and even different leadership styles. One approach to bridging the cultural divide is creating a hybrid work culture formed from the cultures that compose the coalition. The big question is how this hybrid culture can be brought about. In this chapter, we argue, first, that pre-deployment training in foreign languages, soft skills, common meetings, and an overarching ideology facilitate a hybrid culture and thus effective information sharing. Second, we propose that one of the most important “soft skills” needed to bridge cultural difference is the willingness and the ability of individual members of different cultures to engage in negotiation. We support our contention with a case study of peacekeepers’ perceptions of the challenges with information sharing and collaboration in building a hybrid organizational culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A STANAG defines processes, procedures, terms, and conditions for common military or technical procedures or equipment between the member countries of the alliance. Each NATO state ratifies a STANAG and implements it within their own military.

References

  • Adair, W., Brett, J., Lempereur, A., Okumura, T., Tinsley, C., & Lytle, A. (1998a). Culture and negotiation strategy. Evanston, IL: Dispute Resolution Research Center, Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adair, W., Okumura, T., & Brett, J. M. (1998b). Culturally bound negotiation scripts and joint gains in US and Japanese intra and inter-cultural dyads. Evanston, IL: Dispute Resolution Research Center, Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adair, W. L., & Brett, J. M. (2005). The negotiation dance: Time, culture and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organization Science, 16(1), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adair, W. L., Okumura, T., & Brett, J. M. (2001). Negotiation behavior when cultures collide: The United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 317–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adair, W. L., Tinsley, C. H., & Taylor, M. S. (2006). Managing the intercultural interface: Third culture, antecedents, and consequences. In E. A. Mannix, M. A. Neale, & Y. R. Chen (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 205–232). UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., Axelrod, R., & Davis, R. (2007). Sacred barriers to conflict resolution. Science, 317, 1039–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayoko, B. O., Hartel, C. E., & Callan, V. J. (2002). Resolving the puzzle of productive and destructive conflict in culturally heterogeneous workgroups: A communication accommodation theory approach. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(2), 165–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baba, M. L., Gluesing, J., Ratner, H., & Wagner, K. H. (2004). The contexts of knowing: Natural history of a globally distributed team. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(5), 547–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonvillian, G., & Nowlin, W. A. (1994). Cultural awareness: An essential element of doing business abroad. Business Horizons, 37(6), 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. M. (2001). Negotiating globally: How to negotiate deals, resolve disputes, and make decisions across cultural boundaries. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. M., Adair, W., Lempereur, A., Okumura, T., Shikhirev, P., Tinsley, C., et al. (1998). Culture and joint gains in negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 14(1), 55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, M., & Gelfand, M. (2005). A cultural analysis of the underlying assumptions of negotiation theory. In L. L. Thompson (Ed.), Negotiation theory and research (pp. 173–201). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. M., & Okumura, T. (1998). Inter- and intra-cultural negotiation: US and Japanese negotiators. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 495–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A., & Johnson, E. J. (2004). When do fair beliefs influence bargaining behavior? Experimental bargaining in Japan and the United States. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, D. A., Wilson, S. R., & Drake, L. E. (2000). Culture in context of intercultural negotiation: Individualism-collectivism and paths to integrative agreements. Human Communication Research, 26(4), 591–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. L. (1999). The heuristic systematic model in its broader context. In S. L. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., & Li, S. (2005). Cross-national differences in cooperative decision-making in mixed-motive business contexts: The mediating effect of vertical and horizontal individualism. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 622–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. R., Mannix, E. A., & Okumura, T. (2003). The importance of who you meet: Effects of self versus other-concerns among negotiators in the United States, The People’s Republic of China, and Japan. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (1991). Negotiating across cultures: Communication obstacles in international diplomacy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L. W., Hayes, M. D., & Landon, J. J. (1996). Humanitarian and peace operations: NGOs and the military in the interagency process. USA: NDU Press Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drisko, M. A. (1977). An Analysis of professional military ethics: Their importance, development and inculcation. Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffey, T. (2000). Cultural issues in contemporary peacekeeping. International Peacekeeping, 7(1), 142–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. (2002). Multinational teams: A new perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elron, E. (2008). The interplay between the transnational and multinational: Intercultural integrating mechanisms in UN peace operations. In J. Soeters & Ph Manigart (Eds.), Military cooperation in multinational peace operations (pp. 28–49). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elron, E., Shamir, B., & Ben-Ari, E. (1999). Why don’t they fight each other? Cultural diversity and operational unity in multinational forces. Armed Forces & Society, 26, 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G. (1983). International negotiation: Cross-cultural perception. The Humanist, 43(6), 14–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw–Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., & Brett, J. M. (2004). The handbook of negotiation and culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford U. P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., & Christakopoulou, S. (1999). Culture and negotiator cognition: Judgment accuracy and negotiation processes in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(3), 248–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., & Dyer, N. (2000). A cultural perspective on negotiation: Progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Applied Psychology, 49(1), 62–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Higgins, M., Nishii, L. H., Raver, J. L., & Dominguez, A. (2002). Culture and egocentric biases of fairness in conflict and negotiation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 833–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Major, V. S., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L. H., & O’Brien, K. (2006). Negotiating relationally: The dynamics of the relational self in negotiations. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 427–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., & McCusker, C. (2002). Metaphor and the cultural construction of negotiation: A paradigm for theory and research. In M. Gannon & K. L. Newman (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural management (pp. 292–314). New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Nishii, L. H., Holcombe, K. M., Dyer, N., Ohbuchi, K. I., & Fukuno, M. (2001). Cultural influences on cognitive representations of conflict: Interpretations of conflict episodes in the United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1059–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., & Realo, A. (1999). Individualism-collectivism and accountability in intergroup negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 721–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M., Jones, G. R., & Gonzalez, J. A. (1998). The role of affect in cross-cultural negotiations. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(4), 749–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, W. (1971). Culture, language and society. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Modular Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendon, D. W., Roy, M. H., & Ahmed, Z. U. (2003). Negotiation concession patterns: A multicountry, multiperiod study. American Business Review, 21(1), 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocker, J.L., & Wilmot, W.W. (2009). Interpersonal conflict. Boston: McGraw–Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoftsede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikhleifat, F. (2006). Educators and cultural normalization. Furkan, 58(3), 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict—outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 187–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamins, M. A., Johnston, W. J., & Graham, J. L. (1998). A multi-method examination of buyer-seller interactions among Japanese and American businesspeople. Journal of International Marketing, 6(1), 8–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, F., & Strodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston IL: Row Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. (1999). A script theoretical analysis of international negotiating behavior. In R. J. Bies, R. J. Lewicki, & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research in negotiation in organizations (pp. 285–311). Greenwich, CT: Elsevier Sci/JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, J. D. (1998). By sea, by land: The Royal Marines, 1919–1997—An authorised history. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (1986). The manager as negotiator. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeds, C. A. (2001). Culture, conflict resolution, peacekeeper training and the d mediator. International Peacekeeping, 8(4), 92–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K. (1997). Negotiation and reward allocations across cultures. In P. C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial organizational psychology (pp. 640–675). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K. & Bond, M.H. (2004). Social axioms: A model of social beliefs in multi-cultural perspective. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 119–197). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Shaffer, M. A. (2005). An investigation of expatriate adjustment and performance: A social capital perspective. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 5(3), 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., Anderson, T., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Jaeger, A., & Saunders, D. (2002). Individual perception, bargaining behavior and negotiation outcomes: A comparison across two countries. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 2(2), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., Kitayama, S., & Heiman, R. (1997). Culture and basic psychological principles. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 857–913). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. W., & Fu, H. (2001). How does culture influence negotiation? Dynamic constructivist analysis. Social Cognition, 19(3), 324–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. W., Leung, K., & Iyengar, S. S. (2004). Person perception in the heat of conflict: negative trait attributions affect procedural preferences and account for situational and cultural differences. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamukoglu, O. (2004). Unutulanlar disinda yeni bir sey yok. Istanbul: Harmoni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, P. (2001). The cultural context of peacemaking. In D. Christie, R. Wagner, & D. Winter (Eds.), Peace conflict and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century (pp. 183–192). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, L. (2002). Barriers to adaptability in a multinational team. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 46(3), 225–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, L., & Pomranky, R. (2001). The chameleon project for adaptable commanders and teams. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 45(4), 513–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probst, T. M., Carnevale, P. J., & Triandis, H. C. (1999). Cultural values in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77(3), 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, R. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. (1991). The person and the situation. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, R. A. (2003). Cross-cultural considerations in complex peace operations. Negotiation Journal, 19(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweder, R. (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sesen, H. (2013). Orgut kulturu. In Ü. Sığrı & S. Gurbuz (Eds.), Orgutsel davranis (pp. 545–583). Istanbul: Beta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. L., Von Glinow, M., & Cheng, J. L. C. (2005). Managing multinational teams: Global perspectives. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeters, J., & Szvircsev Tresch, T. (2010). Towards cultural integration in multinational peace operations. Defence Studies, 10(1–2), 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. (2005). The mind and heart of the negotiator. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. L. (1991). Information exchange in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(2), 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, C. H. (1997). Culture’s in nuances on conflict management behaviors in the workplace (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, C. H. (1998). Models of conflict resolution in Japanese, German and American Cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 316–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, C. H. (2001). How negotiators get to yes: Predicting the constellation of conflict management strategies used across cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 583–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, C. H., & Brett, J. M. (2001). Managing work place conflict in the United States and Hong Kong. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(2), 360–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, C. H., & Brodt, S. E. (2004). Conflict management in Asia: A dynamic framework and future directions. In K. Leung & S. White (Eds.), Handbook of Asian management (pp. 439–458). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, C. H., & Pillutla, M. M. (1998). Negotiating in the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(4), 711–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranca, O., & Garon, R. (2007, March 25–30). Fight it or freeze it: Which generation of peacekeeping operations is more apt to solve conflicts? Paper presented at 49th ISA Annual Convention, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tressler, D. (2007). Negotiation in the new strategic environment: Lessons from Iraq. Carlisle PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989: Cross-cultural perspectives. Current theory and research in motivation (Vol. 37, pp. 41–133). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C., Carnevale, P., Gelfand, M. J., Robert, C., & Wasti, S. A. (2001). Culture and deception in business negotiations: A multilevel analysis. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 1(1), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1993). Riding the waves of culture. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F., & Turner, C. H. (1993). Riding the waves of culture. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2003). Handbook on United Nations multidimensional peacekeeping operations. New York: Peacekeeping Best Practices Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Army. (2006). Ranger handbook. Georgia: Fort Benning.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Army. (2014). Field manual 3–16: The army in multinational operations. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, A., Srivastava, J., & Lee, S. (2005). The role of cultural orientation in bargaining under incomplete information: Differences in causal attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(1), 72–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderstoep, S. W., & Johnston, D. D. (2009). Research methods for everyday life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkema, R. J. (2004). Demographic, cultural, and economic predictors of perceived ethicality of negotiation behavior: A nine-country analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57(1), 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Brett, J. M., Tenbrunsel, A. E., Okumura, T., Moore, D. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2002). Cognitions and behavior in asymmetric social dilemmas: A comparison of two cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ünsal Sığrı .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sığrı, Ü., Kadir Varoğlu, A., Başar, U., Varoğlu, D. (2017). Information Sharing in Multinational Peacekeeping Operations. In: Goldenberg, I., Soeters, J., Dean, W. (eds) Information Sharing in Military Operations. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42819-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics