Changing Currents: A Case Study in the Evolution of Water Law in Western Canada

  • Oliver M. BrandesEmail author
  • Deborah Curran
Part of the Global Issues in Water Policy book series (GLOB, volume 17)


New social, economic and environmental priorities are challengeing the Canadian water law regime. Water law in western Canada, a direct product of the colonial legal system and European settlement, illustrates many of the emerging tensions associated with a modern water management regime in flux. In an age of increasing hydrologic uncertainty with drier summers followed by more extreme storm events, lawmakers are seeking to increase resilience both for the environment and also for the institutions and the laws that govern freshwater resources. In Canada evidence of an evolving water law and management regime is already apparent—from developments in Aboriginal law that are changing how and who governs water, retreat by the federal government as an active participant in water resource management, to increased provincial efforts to fill that void.This chapter explains the structure and foundations of Canada’s approach to water law, in particular in western Canada; and explores how water law is changing, and what this reveals about the potential of a twenty-first century approach to water management and governance. It will explicitly review the primary allocation regimes that exist across Canada: modified common law riparian rights in the Maritime provinces and Ontario; Quebec’s civil law tradition; the authority management approach in the North; and the prior allocation system that underpins the prairie provinces and British Columbia. Through this discussion the chapter will set out the foundational principles that characterize the current approach to western water law. Investigation into the recent law reform in British Columbia provides the focus to better understand Canadian western water law and to identify characteristics of an emerging regime based on partnership and with an explicit emphasis on protecting water for nature. This case study explores how modern water governance requires a more collaborative approach where all governments, rights holders, and stakeholders have roles and responsibilities, with creative integration of top-down and bottom-up planning and decision-making. The example of British Columbia demonstrates how this water law regime is “changing the current”—evolving gradually toward a more collaborative and adaptable system with the promise of its new Water Sustainability Act.


Water Allocation Provincial Government Water Sustainability Legal Regime Foundational Principle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Acton v. Blundell. (1843). 12 M. W. 324.Google Scholar
  2. Alberta Environment. (2003). Water for life strategy. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.
  3. Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP). (2016). Water for life. Accessed 25 Mar 2016.
  4. Bailey, A. (2008). Federalism: Water law: The interjurisdictional context. Centre for Constitutional Studies, University of Alberta. Accessed 24 Mar 2016.
  5. BC Ministry of Environment (BC MoE). (2008). Living water smart: British Columbia’s water plan. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.
  6. BC Ministry of Environment (BC MoE). (2016). Modernization process. Development of living water smart and the water act modernization process. Accessed 24 Mar 2016.
  7. BC Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations (BC FLNRO). (2015). Fishing closures announced for south coast. BC Government News, 20 July. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.
  8. Borrows, J. (2002). Recovering Canada: The resurgence of indigenous law. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brandes, O. M. (2005). At a Watershed: Ecological governance and sustainable water management in Canada. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 16(1), 79–97.Google Scholar
  10. Brandes, O. M. (2014, May 5). New BC water act generally gets things right. The Province. Google Scholar
  11. Brandes, O. M., & Nowlan, L. (2009). Wading into uncertain waters: Using markets to transfer water rights in Canada—Possibilities and pitfalls. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 19(3), 267–287.Google Scholar
  12. Brandes, O. M., & O’Riordan, J. (2014). Decision-makers brief: A blueprint for watershed governance in British Columbia. Victoria: POLIS Project on Ecological Governance, University of Victoria. Accessed 18 Mar 2016.Google Scholar
  13. Brandes, O. M., O’Riordan, J., O’Riordan, T., & Brandes, L. (2014). A blueprint for watershed governance in British Columbia. Canada: POLIS Project on Ecological Governance, University of Victoria. Accessed 23 Mar 2016.
  14. Brandes, O. M., Carr-Wilson, S., Curran, D., & Simms, R. (2015). Awash with opportunity: Ensuring the sustainability of British Columbia’s new water law. POLIS Project on Ecological Governance, University of Victoria, Canada. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.
  15. Brandes, O. M., Morris, T., Archer, J. L., Brandes, L., Moore, M. L., O’Riordan, J., et al. (2016). Illumination: Insights and perspectives for building effective watershed governance in B.C. Victoria: POLIS Project on Ecological Governance, University of Victoria. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.Google Scholar
  16. Brooks, N. (2005). Indian reserved water rights: An overview. CRS Report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research ServiceGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell River Mirror. (2015, June 23). Record low flow forces down dam discharge. Campbell River Mirror. Accessed 22 Mar 2016.
  18. CBC News. (2015, July 3). Vancouver Island fishing banned as drought hits level 4. CBC News British Columbia. Accessed 25 Mar 2016.
  19. Chasemore v. Richards (1859) 7 HLC 349.Google Scholar
  20. Chief Gale and the Fort Nelson First Nation v. Assistant Regional Water Manager. (2015, September 3). BC EAB Decision, 2012-WAT-013(c).Google Scholar
  21. Christensen, R., & Brandes, O. M. (2015) California’s Oranges and B.C.’s Apples? Lessons for B.C. from California groundwater reform. POLIS Project on Ecological Governance, University of Victoria, Canada. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.
  22. Constitution Act (1867) (U.K.) 30 & 31 Vict., c. 3, s. 91 and 92, reprinted in RSC 1985, App. II, No. 5Google Scholar
  23. Cook, C., & Bakker, K. (2011). Water governance in Canada: Innovation and fragmentation. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 27(2), 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Council of Canadian Academies. (2009). The sustainable management of groundwater in CanadaExpert Panel on Groundwater. Ottawa: Council of Canadian Academies.Google Scholar
  25. Curran, D. (2014a). Can BC’s New Water Sustainability Act Plug the Leaks? Seminar for University of Calgary Faculty of Law, Calgary, Canada.Google Scholar
  26. Curran, D. (2014b). British Columbia’s Water Sustainability ActA new approach to adaptive management and no compensation regulation. The University of Calgary Faculty of Law Blog on Developments in Alberta Law. Accessed 28 May 2014.
  27. Curran, D. (2014c). British Columbia’s New Water Sustainability ActWaiting for the details. Environmental Law Centre, University of Victoria. Accessed 21 Mar 2016.
  28. Curran, D. (2015). Water law as watershed endeavour: Federal inactivity as an opportunity for local initiative. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 28(1), 53–88.Google Scholar
  29. Curran, D., & Brandes, O. M. (2012). When the water dries up: Lessons from the failure of water entitlements in Canada, the U.S. and Australia—Workshop Discussion Paper. University of Victoria, Canada. Accessed 25 Mar 2016.
  30. Curran, D., & Mascher, S. (2016). Adaptation in water law: Evaluating Australian (New South Wales) and Canadian (British Columbia) law reform initiatives. McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 12(1), Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  31. de Loë, R., Varghese, J., Ferreyra, C., & Kreutzwiser, R. (2007). Water allocation and water security in Canada: Initiating a policy dialogue for the 21st Century. Guelph: Guelph Water Management Group, University of Guelph.Google Scholar
  32. Fumano, D. (2015, June 10). Water experts urge B.C. to take a lesson from California drought. The Province. Accessed 22 Mar 2016.
  33. Furubotn, E., & Pejovich, S. (1972). Property rights and economic theory: A survey of recent literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 10(4), 1137–1162.Google Scholar
  34. Gage, A. (2014). The strengths and weaknesses of the new Water Sustainability Act. Accessed 23 Mar 2016.
  35. Government of Northwest Territories (GNWT). (2016). Strategy development timeline for northern voices northern peoples initiative. NWT Water Stewardship. Accessed 21 Mar 2016.
  36. Government of the Northwest Territories and Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada. (2010). Northern voices, northern waters: NWT Water Stewardship Strategy. Accessed 23 Mar 2016.
  37. Harris, E. (2013). The evolution of water rights in the nineteenth century: The role of climate and asset type. Natural Resources Journal, 53, 217–263.Google Scholar
  38. Hogg, P. (2007). Constitutional Law of Canada, student edition. Thomson Carswell, Scarborough Interprovincial Co-operatives Ltd. v. Manitoba (1975) [1976] 1 SCR 477.Google Scholar
  39. Hutchins, W. A., Ellis, H. H., & DeBraal, J. P. (1971). Water rights laws in the nineteen western states. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson, N. K., & DuMars, C. T. (1989). A survey of the evolution of western water law in response to changing economic and public interest demands. Natural Resources Journal, 29, 348–387.Google Scholar
  41. Leighton, B. (2015, July 4). Heat wave forces burning ban, fishing closures as BC copes with drought. The Province. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.
  42. Lucas, A. R. (1990). Security of title in Canadian water rights. Calgary: Canadian Institute of Resources Law.Google Scholar
  43. Matsui, K. (2009). Native peoples and water rights: Irrigation, dams and the law in western Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Matthews, N., & Schmidt, J. J. (2014). False promises: The contours, contexts and contestation of good water governance in Lao PDR and Alberta, Canada. International Journal of Water Governance, 2(2–3), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mattison, J. (2016, February 1–2). Understanding the context: Environmental flow needs in British Columbia. Paper presented at the forum on environmental flow needs in British Columbia, WWF-Canada and POLIS Project on Ecological Governance, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  46. Metro Vancouver. (2015). Reservoir levels and daily consumption. Accessed 22 Mar 2016.
  47. Muldoon, P. R., Lucas, A. R., Gibson, R. B., Pickfield, P., & Williams, J. (2015). An introduction to environmental law and policy in Canada (2nd ed.). Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publications.Google Scholar
  48. Napoleon, V. (2007). Thinking about indigenous legal orders. National Centre for First Nations Governance. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.
  49. National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy. (2010). Changing currents: Water sustainability and the future of Canada’s natural resource sectors. Ottawa, Canada. Accessed 21 Mar 2016.
  50. Nowlan, L. (2005). Buried treasure: Groundwater permitting and pricing in Canada. Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation. Accessed 22 Mar 2016.
  51. Nowlan, L. (2012). CPR for Canadian rivers—Law to conserve, protect, and restore environmental flows in Canada. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 23, 203–252.Google Scholar
  52. Nowlan, L, & Bakker, K. (2010). Practising shared water governance in Canada: A primer. UBC Program on Water Governance, Vancouver, Canada. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.
  53. Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (OMECC). (2016). Source protection. Development of Ontario’s comprehensive source protection program. Accessed 21 Mar 2016.
  54. Outdoor Recreation Council of British Columbia and Ducks Unlimited Canada. (2014, March 12). New water act will make BC leader in environmental stewardship: Environment Minister. CTV News Vancouver. Accessed 25 Mar 2016.
  55. Pearse, P. H., & Quinn, F. (1996). Recent developments in federal water policy: One step forward, two steps back. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 21(4), 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Percy, D. R. (1988). The framework of water rights legislation in Canada. Calgary: Canadian Institute of Resources Law.Google Scholar
  57. Percy, D. R. (2004). The limits of western Canadian water allocation law. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 14, 313–327.Google Scholar
  58. Phare, M. S. (2009). Denying the source: The crisis of first nations water rights. Victoria: Rocky Mountain Books.Google Scholar
  59. Pynn, L. (2015, September 17). Competition for precious water in drought-stricken Nicola Valley. The Vancouver Sun. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.
  60. Quebec Government. (2009). An act to affirm the collective nature of water resources and provide for increased water resource protection, CQLR c C-6.2.
  61. R. v. Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd. (1988). 1 SCR 401Google Scholar
  62. R. v. Hydro-Québec. (1997). 3 SCR 213Google Scholar
  63. Rivera, A. (2005). How well do we understand groundwater in Canada? A science case study. In: Nowlan, L. (Ed.), Buried treasure: Groundwater permitting and pricing in Canada. Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation (pp. 4–12). Accessed 20 Mar 2016.
  64. Rogers, P., & Hall, A. W. (2003). Effective water governance. TEC Background Papers, No. 7. Global Water Partnership Secretariat, Stockholm, Sweden. Accessed 21 Mar 2016.
  65. Saskatchewan Water Security Agency (SWSA). (2012). Area 1.3: Water allocation system. In: 25 year Saskatchewan water security plan action (pp. 8–9). Accessed 22 Mar 2016.
  66. Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shrubsole, D. (Ed.). (2004). Canadian perspectives on integrated water resources management. Cambridge: Canadian Water Resource Association.Google Scholar
  68. Sieniuc, K. (2015, July 29). First Nations Tribal Council suspends Okanagan sockeye salmon fishery. The Globe and Mail. 29 July. Accessed 22 Mar 2016.
  69. Thayer v. California Dev. Co. (1912). 164 Cal. 117, 128 Pac. 21Google Scholar
  70. Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia. (2014). SCC 44Google Scholar
  71. van der Valk, M. R., & Keenan, P. (2011). Principles of good governance at different water governance levels. Papers presented at a workshop held on 22 March 2011 in Delft, The Netherlands. UNESCO, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  72. Water Act, RSBC. (1996). c 483, s. 2.
  73. Water Act, RSA. (2000). c W-3, s. 30.
  74. Water Rights Act, CCSM. (2015). c W-80, ss. 8-9.
  75. Water Sustainability Act, SBC. (2014). c 15.
  76. Weir v. British Columbia. (Deputy Comptroller of Water Rights). (2014). BC EAB Decision, 2013-WAT-013(b), 015(c), 016(b), 017(c), 018(c), & 019(c). 14–17 April 2014 and 3–5 June 2014.Google Scholar
  77. Walker, B. H., & Salt, D. A. (2006). Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  78. Wilkinson, C. F. (1992). Crossing the next meridian: Land, water, and the future of the west. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  79. Wilson-Raybould, J. (2013). Re: Water sustainability act legislative proposal. Submission to Minister Mary Polak on the Water Sustainability Act, BC Assembly of First Nations, 2 December 2013.
  80. Wood, C., & Pentland, R. (2013). Down the drain: How we are failing to protect our water resources. Vancouver: Greystone Publishing.Google Scholar
  81. WWF Canada. (2014). This year you rewrote history: A bold new BC water act protects water for nature and people. WWF-Canada Annual Report 2014. Accessed 22 Mar 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.POLIS Project on Ecological Governance and Centre for Global StudiesUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Law and School of Environmental StudiesUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations