Skip to main content

Integrating Energy Optimization and Production Scheduling in Energy-Intensive Industries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Energy Systems Engineering

Abstract

The share of volatile renewable energy generation is rapidly increasing in many countries around the world. As in electric power grids the supply always needs to equal the demand, the increasing volatility of energy supply imposes a major challenge to the stability of power grids. Demand response actions offer a very cost-efficient way to cope with this challenge. Especially energy-intensive industries such as metals, cement or pulp and paper offer a high potential to adjust their energy consumption towards the power grid in the form of large controllable loads. In this chapter we look into how this potential could be used without affecting the production volume. Advanced scheduling algorithms allow to efficiently plan the production at industrial sites. Enabling such scheduling algorithms for energy-aware production planning as well as the integration of scheduling and energy optimization solutions allows to leverage a high potential for shifting energy consumption from times with low to times with high renewable energy generation. In addition, this approach allows plant owners to significantly reduce their energy cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ait-Ali, A. (2015). Integration of production scheduling and energy management. Master’s thesis, KTH Stockholm. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-160136.

  • Baboli, P. T., Moghaddam, M. P., & Eghbal, M. (2011). Present status and future trends in enabling demand response programs. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldea, M., & Harjunkoski, I. (2014). Integrated production scheduling and process control: A systematic review. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 71, 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benders, J. F. (1962). Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Numerische Mathematik, 4, 238–252.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, P. M., Harjunkoski, I., & Grossmann, I. E. (2011). Optimal scheduling of continuous plants with energy constraints. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 35, 372–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, P., Sun, L., & Harjunkoski, I. (2013). Resource-task network formulations for industrial demand side management of a steel plant. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(36), 13046–13058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles River Associates. (2005). Primer on demand-side management with an emphasis on price-responsive programs. Prepared for The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Y., & You, F. (2012). Integration of scheduling and control with online closed-loop implementation: fast computational strategy and large-scale global optimization algorithm. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 47, 248–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti, J., & Holtberg, P. (2011). International energy outlook 2011. US Energy Information Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engell, S., & Harjunkoski, I. (2012). Optimal operation: scheduling, advanced control and their integration. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 47, 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2011). Energy 2020. A strategy for competitive sustainable and secure energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, I., Renedo, C. J., Pérez, S. F., Ortiz, A., & MaËœnana, M. (2012). A review: energy recovery inbatch processes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(4), 2260–2277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floudas, C. A., & Lin, X. (2004). Continuous-time versus discrete-time approaches for scheduling of chemical processes: a review. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 28, 2109–2129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gahm, C., Denz, F., Dirr, M., & Tuma, A. (2016). Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: A review and research framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(3), 744–757.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiadis, M. C., & Papageorgiou, L. G. (2001). Optimal scheduling of heat-integrated multipurpose plants under fouling conditions. Applied Thermal Engineering, 21(16), 1675–1697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadera, H., Harjunkoski, I., Sand, G., Grossmann, I. E., & Engell, S. (2015). Optimization of steel production scheduling with complex time-sensitive electricity cost. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 76, 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halim, I., & Srinivasan, R. (2009). Sequential methodology for scheduling of heat-integrated batch plants. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 48(18), 8551–8565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harjunkoski, I., Maravelias, C. T., Bongers, P., Castro, P. M., Engell, S., Grossmann, I. E., et al. (2014). Scope for industrial applications of production scheduling models and solution methods. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 62, 161–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, K. (1992). Linear mean value cross decomposition: A generalization of the Kornai-Liptak method. European Journal of Operational Research, 62, 55–73.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, K. (1994). A convergence proof for linear mean value cross decomposition. ZOR—Methods and Models of Operations Research, 39, 157–186.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, K., & Kiwiel, K. C. (2006). Mean value cross decomposition for nonlinear convex problems. Optimization Methods and Software, 21(3), 401–417.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kondili, E., Pantelides, C. C., & Sargent, W. H. (1993). A general algorithm for short-term scheduling of batch operations—IMILP formulation. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2, 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkert, L., Harjunkoski, I., Isaksson, A., Säynevirta, S., Saarela, A., & Sand, G. (2015). Scheduling and energy—industrial challenges and opportunities. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 72, 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, D., Goli, S., & McKane, A. (2012). Examining synergies between energy management and demand response: A case study at two California industrial facilities. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantelides, C. C. (1994). Unified frameworks for optimal process planning and scheduling. IN Foundations of computer-aided process operations (pp. 253–274). New York: CACHE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinedo, M., & Chao, X. (1999). Operations scheduling with applications in manufacturing and services. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-289779-1.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ribas, I., Leisten, R., & Framiñan, J. M. (2010). Review and classification of hybrid flowshop scheduling problems from a production system and a solutions procedure perspective. Computers and Operations Research, 37(8), 1439–1454.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, V. T. J. (1983). Cross decomposition for mixed integer programming. Mathematical Programming, 25, 46–63.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Seid, E. R., & Majozi, T. (2014). Optimization of energy and water use in multipurpose batch plants using an improved mathematical formulation. Chemical Engineering Science, 111, 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, D. (2011). Alcoa—dynamic demand response DOE workshop—10/25–10/26. In Presented at 2011 Department of Energy Load Participation in Ancillary Services Workshop, Washington, D.C. October 2011. https://www1.eere.energy.gov/analysis/pdfs/alcoa_dewayne_todd.pdf.

  • Wolfe, P., & Dantzig, G. B. (1960). Decomposition principle for linear programs. Operations Research, 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuge, J., & Ierapetritou, M. G. (2012). Integration of scheduling and control with closed loop implementation. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 51(25), 8550–8565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iiro Harjunkoski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Merkert, L., Harjunkoski, I. (2017). Integrating Energy Optimization and Production Scheduling in Energy-Intensive Industries. In: Kopanos, G., Liu, P., Georgiadis, M. (eds) Advances in Energy Systems Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42803-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42803-1_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42802-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42803-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics