Abstract
The share of volatile renewable energy generation is rapidly increasing in many countries around the world. As in electric power grids the supply always needs to equal the demand, the increasing volatility of energy supply imposes a major challenge to the stability of power grids. Demand response actions offer a very cost-efficient way to cope with this challenge. Especially energy-intensive industries such as metals, cement or pulp and paper offer a high potential to adjust their energy consumption towards the power grid in the form of large controllable loads. In this chapter we look into how this potential could be used without affecting the production volume. Advanced scheduling algorithms allow to efficiently plan the production at industrial sites. Enabling such scheduling algorithms for energy-aware production planning as well as the integration of scheduling and energy optimization solutions allows to leverage a high potential for shifting energy consumption from times with low to times with high renewable energy generation. In addition, this approach allows plant owners to significantly reduce their energy cost.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ait-Ali, A. (2015). Integration of production scheduling and energy management. Master’s thesis, KTH Stockholm. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-160136.
Baboli, P. T., Moghaddam, M. P., & Eghbal, M. (2011). Present status and future trends in enabling demand response programs. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 1–6.
Baldea, M., & Harjunkoski, I. (2014). Integrated production scheduling and process control: A systematic review. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 71, 377–390.
Benders, J. F. (1962). Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Numerische Mathematik, 4, 238–252.
Castro, P. M., Harjunkoski, I., & Grossmann, I. E. (2011). Optimal scheduling of continuous plants with energy constraints. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 35, 372–387.
Castro, P., Sun, L., & Harjunkoski, I. (2013). Resource-task network formulations for industrial demand side management of a steel plant. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(36), 13046–13058.
Charles River Associates. (2005). Primer on demand-side management with an emphasis on price-responsive programs. Prepared for The World Bank.
Chu, Y., & You, F. (2012). Integration of scheduling and control with online closed-loop implementation: fast computational strategy and large-scale global optimization algorithm. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 47, 248–268.
Conti, J., & Holtberg, P. (2011). International energy outlook 2011. US Energy Information Administration.
Engell, S., & Harjunkoski, I. (2012). Optimal operation: scheduling, advanced control and their integration. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 47, 121–133.
European Union. (2011). Energy 2020. A strategy for competitive sustainable and secure energy.
Fernández, I., Renedo, C. J., Pérez, S. F., Ortiz, A., & Ma˜nana, M. (2012). A review: energy recovery inbatch processes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(4), 2260–2277.
Floudas, C. A., & Lin, X. (2004). Continuous-time versus discrete-time approaches for scheduling of chemical processes: a review. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 28, 2109–2129.
Gahm, C., Denz, F., Dirr, M., & Tuma, A. (2016). Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: A review and research framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(3), 744–757.
Georgiadis, M. C., & Papageorgiou, L. G. (2001). Optimal scheduling of heat-integrated multipurpose plants under fouling conditions. Applied Thermal Engineering, 21(16), 1675–1697.
Hadera, H., Harjunkoski, I., Sand, G., Grossmann, I. E., & Engell, S. (2015). Optimization of steel production scheduling with complex time-sensitive electricity cost. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 76, 117–136.
Halim, I., & Srinivasan, R. (2009). Sequential methodology for scheduling of heat-integrated batch plants. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 48(18), 8551–8565.
Harjunkoski, I., Maravelias, C. T., Bongers, P., Castro, P. M., Engell, S., Grossmann, I. E., et al. (2014). Scope for industrial applications of production scheduling models and solution methods. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 62, 161–193.
Holmberg, K. (1992). Linear mean value cross decomposition: A generalization of the Kornai-Liptak method. European Journal of Operational Research, 62, 55–73.
Holmberg, K. (1994). A convergence proof for linear mean value cross decomposition. ZOR—Methods and Models of Operations Research, 39, 157–186.
Holmberg, K., & Kiwiel, K. C. (2006). Mean value cross decomposition for nonlinear convex problems. Optimization Methods and Software, 21(3), 401–417.
Kondili, E., Pantelides, C. C., & Sargent, W. H. (1993). A general algorithm for short-term scheduling of batch operations—IMILP formulation. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2, 211–227.
Merkert, L., Harjunkoski, I., Isaksson, A., Säynevirta, S., Saarela, A., & Sand, G. (2015). Scheduling and energy—industrial challenges and opportunities. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 72, 183–198.
Olsen, D., Goli, S., & McKane, A. (2012). Examining synergies between energy management and demand response: A case study at two California industrial facilities. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Pantelides, C. C. (1994). Unified frameworks for optimal process planning and scheduling. IN Foundations of computer-aided process operations (pp. 253–274). New York: CACHE Publications.
Pinedo, M., & Chao, X. (1999). Operations scheduling with applications in manufacturing and services. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-289779-1.
Ribas, I., Leisten, R., & Framiñan, J. M. (2010). Review and classification of hybrid flowshop scheduling problems from a production system and a solutions procedure perspective. Computers and Operations Research, 37(8), 1439–1454.
Roy, V. T. J. (1983). Cross decomposition for mixed integer programming. Mathematical Programming, 25, 46–63.
Seid, E. R., & Majozi, T. (2014). Optimization of energy and water use in multipurpose batch plants using an improved mathematical formulation. Chemical Engineering Science, 111, 335–349.
Todd, D. (2011). Alcoa—dynamic demand response DOE workshop—10/25–10/26. In Presented at 2011 Department of Energy Load Participation in Ancillary Services Workshop, Washington, D.C. October 2011. https://www1.eere.energy.gov/analysis/pdfs/alcoa_dewayne_todd.pdf.
Wolfe, P., & Dantzig, G. B. (1960). Decomposition principle for linear programs. Operations Research, 101–111.
Zhuge, J., & Ierapetritou, M. G. (2012). Integration of scheduling and control with closed loop implementation. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 51(25), 8550–8565.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Merkert, L., Harjunkoski, I. (2017). Integrating Energy Optimization and Production Scheduling in Energy-Intensive Industries. In: Kopanos, G., Liu, P., Georgiadis, M. (eds) Advances in Energy Systems Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42803-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42803-1_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42802-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42803-1
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)