The Shackles of Practice: History of Psychology, Research Assessment, and the Curriculum

Part of the Annals of Theoretical Psychology book series (AOTP, volume 14)


The history of psychology is being increasingly marginalised in British universities. In this article we argue that this marginalisation has been brought about by a combination of material circumstances resulting from the marketisation of the UK Higher Education sector. One consequence of this, the statutory audit known as the Research Excellence Framework, has made it increasingly difficult to undertake historical work as it has traditionally been done in UK psychology departments. At best such a situation challenges the ambition for historical work to have an impact on psychology. At worst it potentially renders the history of psychology irrelevant. Yet the theoretical justification for history of psychology has never been stronger. Psychology’s subject matter is neither exclusively natural nor entirely socially constructed, but lies on that “somewhat suspect borderland between physiology and philosophy” as Wilhelm Wundt put it. The discipline’s ontological claims are therefore always made from within epistemological frameworks which are themselves products of particular historical contexts. Such arguments have persuaded us that history of psychology has a fundamental role to play within the wider discipline. Yet as historians we cannot ignore the constraining social and material circumstances in which our field operates. We conclude that although the constraints of practice suggest that its prospects for influencing its parent discipline are seriously challenged, there are nevertheless opportunities for the history of psychology in areas such as the undergraduate curriculum.


Marketisation Interactive kinds Neoliberalism Research assessment Psychology curriculum Marginalisation 


  1. Anderson, B. (2011). There is no such thing as attention. Frontiers in psychology, 2(246), 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. Arnaud, S. (2015). On hysteria: The invention of a medical category between 1670 and 1820. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baritz, L. (1960). The servants of power: A history of the use of social science in American industry. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes, B. (1977). Interests and the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Barrett, L. F. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(1), 28–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartlett, S. J. (1994). The psychology of faculty demoralization in the liberal arts: Burnout, acedia, and the disintegration of idealism. New Ideas in Psychology, 12(3), 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bence, V., & Oppenheim, C. (2005). The evolution of the UK’s Research Assessment Exercise: publications, performance and perceptions. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 37(2), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B. W. (2010). Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation. Higher Education, 59(5), 567–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berche, B., Holovatch, Y., Kenna, R., & Mryglod, O. (2015). Academic research groups: Evaluation of their quality and quality of their evaluation. arXiv:1511.08367.Google Scholar
  12. Billig, M. (1989). Psychology, rhetoric, and cognition. History of the Human Sciences, 2(3), 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Billig, M. (1990). Rhetoric of social psychology. In I. Parker & J. Shotter (Eds.), Deconstructing social psychology (pp. 47–60). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  14. Binkley, S. (2011a). Happiness, positive psychology and the program of neoliberal governmentality. Subjectivity, 4(4), 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Binkley, S. (2011b). Psychological life as enterprise: Social practice and the government of neo-liberal interiority. History of the Human Sciences, 24(3), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. BPS. (2015, October). Standards for the accreditation of undergraduate, conversion and integrated Masters programmes in psychology. Leicester: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  18. Brenninkmeijer, J. (2010). Taking care of one’s brain: How manipulating the brain changes people’s selves. History of the Human Sciences, 23(1), 107–126. doi: 10.1177/0952695109352824.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brinkmann, S. (2005). Human kinds and looping effects in psychology: Foucauldian and hermeneutic perspectives. Theory and Psychology, 15, 769–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brockmeier, J. (2015). Beyond the archive: memory, narrative, and the autobiographical process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brown, R., & Carasso, H. (2013). Everything for sale? The marketisation of UK higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Brysbaert, M., & Rastle, K. (2012). Historical and conceptual issues in psychology (2nd ed.). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  23. Bunn, G. C., Lovie, A. D., & Richards, G. D. (Eds.). (2001). Psychology in Britain: Historical essays and personal reflections. Leicester: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  24. Callon, M., Rip, A., & Law, J. (Eds.). (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Christopher, J. C., & Hickinbottom, S. (2008). Positive psychology, ethnocentrism and the disguised ideology of individualism. Theory and Psychology, 18(5), 563–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Collingwood, R. G. (1946). The idea of history. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  27. Collini, S. (2012). What are universities for? London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  28. Cornejo, C. (2015). From fantasy to imagination: A cultural history and a moral for cultural psychology. Niels Bohr Lecture, Aalborg University.Google Scholar
  29. Danziger, K. (1994). Does the history of psychology have a future? Theory and Psychology, 4(4), 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Daston, L. (2000). Biographies of scientific objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Dixon, T. (2003). From passions to emotions: The creation of a secular psychological category. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Foucault, M. (1973). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  35. Foucault, M. (1977). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  36. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin et al. (Eds.), Technologies of the self (pp. 16–49). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  37. Foucault, M. (1998). Philosophy and psychology. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault (Aesthetics, method, and epistemology, Vol. 2, pp. 249–259). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  38. Furnham, A., & Lester, D. (2012). The development of a short measure of character strength. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 95–101.Google Scholar
  39. Geekie, J., & Read, J. (2009). Making sense of madness: Contesting the meaning of schizophrenia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26(2), 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Giroux, H. A. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 425–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  43. Goertzen, J. R. (2008). On the possibility of unification: The reality and nature of the crisis in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 18, 829–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Goodey, C. F. (2011). A conceptual history of intelligence and “intellectual disability”: The shaping of psychology in early modern Europe. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  45. Green, C. D. (1992). Of immortal mythological beasts: Operationism in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 2, 291–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Green, C. D., & Feinerer, I. (2015). The evolution of The American Journal of Psychology 1, 1887–1903: A network investigation. American Journal of Psychology, 128(3), 387–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Green, C. D., Feinerer, I., & Burman, J. T. (2013). Beyond the schools of psychology 1: a digital analysis of Psychological Review, 1894–1903. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 49(2), 167–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hacking, I. (2007). Kinds of people: Moving targets. Proceedings of the British Academy, 151, 285–318.Google Scholar
  50. Hall, J., Pilgrim, D., & Turpin, G. (Eds.). (2015). Clinical psychology in Britain: Historical perspectives. Leicester: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  51. Harley, S. (2002). The impact of research selectivity on academic work and identity in UK Universities. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Herman, E. (1995). The romance of American psychology: Political culture in the age of experts. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 4(2), 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hug, S. E., Ochsner, M., & Daniel, H.-D. (2014). A framework to explore and develop criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities. International Journal for Education Law and Policy, 10(1), 55–64.Google Scholar
  55. Hyde, A., Clarke, M., & Drennan, J. (2012). The changing role of academics and the rise of managerialism. In B. M. Kehm & U. Teichler (Eds.), The academic profession in Europe: New tasks and new challenges (The changing academic profession in international comparative perspective). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Jones, D., & Elcock, J. (2001). History and theories of psychology: A critical perspective. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  57. Khalidi, M. (2010). Interactive kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61, 335–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Krampen, G. (2016). Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? Scientometrics, 106, 1217–1238.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lasalvia, A., Penta, E., Sartorius, N., & Henderson, S. (2015). Should the label “schizophrenia” be abandoned? Schizophrenia Research, 162, 276–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Law, J., & Hassard, J. (1999). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  62. Leary, D. E. (1994). Metaphors in the history of psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. LeDoux, J. (2002). Synaptic self: How our brains become who we are. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 95(7), 373–374.Google Scholar
  64. Lee, F. S. (2007). The Research Assessment Exercise, the state and the dominance of mainstream economics in British universities. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(2), 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lee, F. S., Pham, X., & Gu, G. (2013). The UK Research Assessment Exercise and the narrowing of UK economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(4), 693–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Legrenzi, P., & Umilta, C. (2011). Neuromania: On the limits of brain science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lorenz, C. (2012). If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry, 38, 599–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Martin, E. (2010). Self-making and the brain. Subjectivity, 3(4), 366–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Molesworth, M. (2010). The marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Moncrieff, J. (2006). Psychiatric drug promotion and the politics of neoliberalism. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188(4), 301–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Morawski, J. G. (1996). Principles of selves: The rhetoric of introductory textbooks in American psychology. In K. J. Gergen & C. F. Graumann (Eds.), Historical dimensions of psychological discourse (pp. 145–162). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Niemiec, R. M. (2013). Mindfulness and character strengths: A practical guide to flourishing. Boston: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  73. Noë, A. (2009). Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  74. Owens, B. (2013). Judgement day. Nature, 502(7471), 288–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Palfreyman, D., & Tapper, T. (2014). Reshaping the university: The rise of the regulated market in Higher Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Parker, I. (2014). Managing neoliberalism and the strong state in higher education: Psychology today. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(3), 250–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pumfrey, S., Rayson, P., & Mariani, J. (2012). Experiments in 17th century English: Manual versus automatic conceptual history. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 27, 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Quality Assurance Agency. (2010). Subject benchmark statement: psychology 2007. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency.Google Scholar
  79. Randall, W. L. (2007). From computer to compost: Rethinking our metaphors for memory. Theory and Psychology, 17(5), 611–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Richards, G. (1987). Of what is history of psychology a history? British Journal for the History of Science, 20(2), 201–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Richards, G. (1989). On psychological language and the physiomorphic basis of human nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Richards, G. (2002). The psychology of psychology: A historically grounded sketch. Theory and Psychology, 12(1), 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Richards, G. (2009). Putting psychology in its place: Critical historical perspectives (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  84. Roediger, H. L. (2008). Why the laws of memory vanished. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 225–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rogers, T. B. (1989). Operationism in psychology: A discussion of the contextual antecedents and an historical interpretation of its longevity. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 25, 139–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rose, N. (1985). The psychological complex. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  87. Rose, N. (1989). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Rose, N. (1996). Inventing ourselves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rose, N. (2003). Neurochemical selves. Society, November/December, 46–59.Google Scholar
  90. Rose, N., & Abi-Rachid, J. M. (2013). Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rose, H., & Rose, S. (1970). Science and society. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  92. Satel, S., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2013). Brainwashed: The seductive appeal of mindless neuroscience. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  93. Shorter, E. (2013). How everyone became depressed: The rise and fall of the nervous breakdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Smith, R. (2005). The history of psychological categories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 55–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Smith, R. (2007). Being human: Historical knowledge and the creation of human nature. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Smith, R. (2013). Between mind and nature: A history of psychology. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  97. Smyth, M. M. (2001). Fact making in psychology: The voice of the introductory textbook. Theory and Psychology, 11(5), 609–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Somerville, S. B. (2000). Queering the color line: Race and the invention of homosexuality in American culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Susman, W. (1984). Personality and the making of twentieth-century culture. In Culture as history: The transformation of American society in the twentieth century (pp. 271–285). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  100. Sussman, R. W. (2014). The myth of race: The troubling persistence of an unscientific idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tallis, R. (2011). Aping mankind: Neuromania, Darwinitis and the misrepresentation of humanity. Durham, UK: Acumen.Google Scholar
  102. Tate, C., & Audette, D. (2001). Theory and research on “race” as a natural kind variable in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 11, 495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Teigen, K. H. (1994). Yerkes-Dodson: A law for all seasons. Theory and Psychology, 4(4), 525–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Teigen, K. H. (2002). One hundred years of laws in psychology. American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Thomson, M. (2006). Psychological subjects: Identity, culture, and health in twentieth-century Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Timimi, S. (2005). Naughty boys: Anti-social behaviour, ADHD and the role of culture. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  107. Tsou, J. Y. (2007). Hacking on the looping effects of psychiatric classifications: What is an interactive and indifferent kind? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 21(3), 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Tyson, P. J., Jones, D., & Elcock, J. (2011). Psychology in social context: Issues and debates. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  109. University and College Union. (2013). The research excellence framework (REF): Survey report. Retrieved December 5, 2015, from
  110. Vidal, F. (2009). Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences, 22(1), 5–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Vinkers, C. H., Tijdink, J. K., & Otte, W. M. (2015). Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: Retrospective analysis. British Medical Journal, 351, h6467.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wetherell, M. (2011). The winds of change: Some challenges in reconfiguring social psychology for the future. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 399–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Williams, J. (2012). Consuming higher education: Why learning can’t be bought. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  114. Wittgenstein, L. (1953/1958). Philosophical investigations (2nd ed.) (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  115. Young, R. M. (1966). Scholarship and the history of the behavioural sciences. History of Science, 5(1), 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  2. 2.Manchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations