Individual Differences and Motivational Effects
Why do some people improve on untrained tasks following cognitive training while others do not? One possibility is that there are individual difference factors that play a key role in cognitive training outcomes. The present chapter examines a range of these factors, including baseline performance, age, personality, and motivation. Some of these factors, such as baseline performance and age, have long been examined in the context of cognitive training, and extant research provides evidence that they contribute to the outcome of both training-related improvements as well as transfer gains. Other factors, including personality and motivation, remain largely unexamined in the context of cognitive training, but preliminary research indicates that they may play a substantial role in the success of these interventions. We suggest that researchers ignore these factors at their peril and that future cognitive training studies should incorporate measures of individual differences in studies well powered enough to examine them. Furthermore, it is possible that for training interventions to be broadly successful for large populations, they must be personalized to take these factors into account.
KeywordsWorking memory Motivation Age Personality Baseline performance Transfer
- Gruszka, A., Matthews, G., & Szymura, B. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control (pp. 295–320). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1210-7.
- Jackson, J. J., Hill, P. L., Payne, B. R., Roberts, B. W., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. (2012). Can an old dog learn (and want to experience) new tricks? Cognitive training increases openness to experience in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 27(2), 286–292. doi: 10.1037/a0025918.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(19), 6829–6833. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801268105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Katz, B., Jaeggi, S., Buschkuehl, M., Shah, P., & Jonides, J. (submitted for publication). The effect of monetary compensation on cognitive training.Google Scholar
- Klingberg, T., Fernell, E., Olesen, P. J., Johnson, M., Gustafsson, P., Dahlström, K., et al. (2005). Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD—A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(2), 177–186. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200502000-00010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Fried, D. E., Hambrick, D. Z., et al. (2013). No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 359–379. doi: 10.1037/a0029082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Urbánek, T., & Marček, V. (2015). Investigating the effectiveness of working memory training in the context of Personality Systems Interaction theory. Psychological Research, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0687-4.
- Willis, S. L. (1989). Improvement with cognitive training: Which old dogs learn what tricks? In Poon, L. W., Rubin, D. C., & Wilson, B. A. (Eds.), Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life (pp. 545–569). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; xii, 708 pp. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511759390.
- Verhaeghen, P., Marcoen, A., & Goossens, L. (1992). Improving memory performance in the aged through mnemonic training: a meta-analytic study. Psychology and aging, 7(2), 242.doi: 10.1037/0882-79184.108.40.206.
- Wass, S. V., Scerif, G., & Johnson, M. H. (2012). Training attentional control and working memory–Is younger, better?. Developmental Review, 32(4), 360-387.doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2012.07.001.