Abstract
Paraphilias and what we now call paraphilic disorders have been puzzling, curiosity-arousing, attention attracting, famous and infamous (take masochism and sadism), maligned, and misunderstood for centuries. Our full understanding of paraphilic behaviors is still lacking. The lack of understanding probably starts with the lack of consensus about the definition, its use, and, at times, its, unfortunately, pejorative use.
The term paraphilia is about 100 years old (the introduction of the term is credited to Friedrich Salomon Krauss in 1903, but it was more generally suggested/introduced by Wilhelm Stekel in German in 1908 and later in 1930). Its meaning and definition vary. The word paraphilia is a construction of two Greek words. The first is para, the meaning of which could vary from “beside, side by side” to “beyond, past, by” to “abnormal or defective” (e.g., in paranoia) to “irregular, altered.” The other term -philia means love, friendship, brotherly love, affection. In “modern” language it could mean a whole spectrum from a friendly feeling toward something or someone, to an abnormal feeling, depending on the context. Thus, paraphilia in a general sense means love beyond the usual (less derogative term) to abnormal love or sexuality (whatever the term normal sexuality means). Some may also define paraphilia as “love for other/marginal object.” The term paraphilia was, in a way, meant to replace terms such as sexual deviation, sodomy, or perversion. It seems that this well-meant semantic change has not been really successful. The definition of paraphilic or sexually “deviant” behavior is also problematic from a fuzzy border between the so-called “normal” or acceptable sexual behavior and abnormal sexual behavior. Take the example of occasional mild spanking of one’s sexual partner during sexual activity enjoyed and asked for by the partner vs. binding, whipping, and even kicking the sexual partner during sexual activity. Where is the border between acceptable (or normal) behavior and abnormal behavior here?
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
Fedoroff JP. Forensic and diagnostic concerns arising from the proposed DSM-5 criteria for paraphilic disorder. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39:238–41.
Downing L. Heteronormality and repronormality in sexological “perversion theory” and the DSM-5’s “paraphilic disorder” diagnoses. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44:1139–45.
Shindel AW, Moser CA. Why are the paraphilias mental disorders? J Sex Med. 2011;8:927–9.
Blanchard R. A brief history of field trials of the DSM diagnostic criteria for paraphilias. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40:861–2.
Moser C. Yet another paraphilia definition fails. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40:483–5.
Wakefield JC. DSM-5 proposed diagnostic criteria for sexual paraphilias: tensions between diagnostic validity and forensic utility. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011;34:195–209.
Fedoroff P. Paraphilic worlds. In: Levine SB, Risen CB, Althof SE, editors. Handbook of clinical sexuality for mental health professionals. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group); 2010. p. 401–24.
Milner JS, Dopke CA, Crouch JL. Paraphilias not otherwise specified. Psychopathology and theory. In: Laws DR, O’Donohue WT, editors. Sexual deviance. Theory, assessment, and treatment. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford; 2008. p. 394–418.
Balon R. Controversies in the diagnosis and treatment of paraphilias. J Sex Marital Ther. 2013;39:7–20.
Garcia FD, Thibault F. Current concepts in the pharmacotherapy of paraphilias. Drugs. 2011;71:771–90.
Laws DR. The public health approach. A way forward? In: Laws DR, O’Donohue WT, editors. Sexual deviance. Theory, assessment, and treatment. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford; 2008. p. 611–28.
Borneman J. Cruel attachments. The ritual rehab of child molesters in Germany. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2015. p. 58.
Cantor JM. Is homosexuality a paraphilia? The evidence for and against it. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41:237–47.
Jahnke S, Schmidt AF, Geradt M, Hoyer J. Stigma-related stress and its correlates among men with pedophilic sexual interest. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44:2173–87.
Davey M. Freedom eludes sex offenders after prison. Int NY Times. 2015:1 + 4.
Cruwys T, Gunaseelan S. “Depression is who I am”: mental illness identity, stigma and wellbeing. J Affect Disord. 2016;189:36–42.
Recommended Reading
Laws DR, O’Donohue WT, editors. Sexual deviance. Theory, assessment, and treatment. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford; 2008.
Hicky EW, editor. Sex crimes and paraphilia. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall Publisher; 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balon, R. (2016). Introduction to the Realm of Paraphilias. In: Balon, R. (eds) Practical Guide to Paraphilia and Paraphilic Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42650-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42650-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42648-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42650-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)