Advertisement

Industrial Internet of Things and Cyber Manufacturing Systems

  • Sabina Jeschke
  • Christian Brecher
  • Tobias Meisen
  • Denis ÖzdemirEmail author
  • Tim Eschert
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Wireless Technology book series (SSWT)

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is an information network of physical objects (sensors, machines, cars, buildings, and other items) that allows interaction and cooperation of these objects to reach common goals [2]. While the IoT affects among others transportation, healthcare, or smart homes, the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) refers in particular to industrial environments. In this context Cyber Manufacturing Systems (CMS) evolved as a significant term. This opening chapter gives a brief introduction of the development of IIoT introducing also the Digital Factory and cyber-physical systems. Furthermore, the challenges and requirements of IIoT and CMS are discussed as well as potentials regarding the application in Industry 4.0 are identified. In this process aspects as economic impact, architectural pattern and infrastructures are taken into account. Besides, also major research initiatives are presented. In addition to that, an orientation to the reader is given in this chapter by providing brief summaries of the chapters published in this book. Hereby, the following research areas are addressed: “Modeling for CPS and CPS”, “Architectural Design Patterns for CMS and IIoT”, “Communication and Networking”, “Artificial Intelligence and Analytics”, and “Evolution of Workforce and Human-Machine-Interaction”. The chapter closes with a discussion about future trends of IIoT and CMS within Industry 4.0.

Keywords

Product Lifecycle Management Product Data Management Innovation Ecosystem Transaction Level Modeling Supervisory Controller 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work for this chapter and for the editing of the book has been partly funded within the Cluster of Excellence “Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries”. The authors would therefor like to thank the German Research Foundation DFG for the kind support.

References

  1. 1.
    Acatech (2011) National Academy of Science and Engineering. Cyber-physical systems: driving force for innovation in mobility, health, energy and production, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The internet of things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bledowski K (2015) The internet of things: industrie 4.0 vs. the industrial internet. https://www.mapi.net/forecasts-data/internet-things-industrie-40-vs-industrial-internet. Accessed 14 June 2016
  4. 4.
    CIA (2016) The world factbook: Germany. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/gm.html. Accessed 29 June 2016
  5. 5.
    Colombo AW, Bangemann T, Karnouskos S, Delsing J, Stluka P, Harrison R, Jammes F, Lastra JL (2014) Industrial cloud-based cyber-physical systems: the IMC-AESOP approach. Springer, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    CyPhERS (2013) Characteristics, capabilities, potential applications of cyber-physical systems: a preliminary analysis. http://www.cyphers.eu/sites/default/files/D2.1.pdf. Accessed 17 Mar 2016
  7. 7.
    Economist (2015) Germany’s industry: does Deutschland do digital? http://www.economist.com/news/business/21678774-europes-biggest-economy-rightly-worried-digitisation-threat-its-industrial. Accessed 19 June 2016
  8. 8.
    Eigner M, Stelzer R (2013) Product lifecycle management: Ein Leitfaden für product development und life cycle management, 2, neu, bearb edn. VDI Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fortino G, Di Fatta G, Ochoa SF (2015) Future generation computer systems: special issue on “Cyber-physical systems (CPS), internet of things (IoT) and big data”. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/future-generation-computer-systems/call-for-papers/special-issue-on-cyber-physical-systems-cps-internet-of-thin/. Accessed 27 June 2016
  10. 10.
    Gamble C, Larsen PG, Pierce K, Woodcock J (2015) cyber-physical systems design: formal foundations, methods and integrated tool chains. In: 3rd FME workshop on formal methods in software engineering (FormaliSE), pp 40–46Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gartner (2015) Gartner’s 2015 hype cycle for emerging technologies identifies the computing innovations that organizations should monitor. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3114217. Accessed 14 June 2016
  12. 12.
    GE (2016) Industrial internet insights: bring together brilliant machines, advanced analytics and people at work. https://www.ge.com/digital/industrial-internet. Accessed 14 June 2016
  13. 13.
    Geissbauer R, Vedso J, Schrauf S (2016) Industry 4.0: building the digital enterprise: 2016 global industry 4.0 survey. PwC, MunichGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gordon RJ (2016) The rise and fall of american growth: the US standard of living since the civil war. Princeton University Press, New JerseyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoang DD, Paik H, Kim C (2012) Service-oriented middleware architectures for cyber-physical systems. Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur 12(1):79–87Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kagermann H, Wahlster W, Helbig J (2013) Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0. Abschlussbericht des Arbeitskreises Industrie 4:5Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kühn W (2006) Digital factory: simulation enhancing the product and production engineering process. In: Winter simulation conference, pp 1899–1906Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee EA (2008) Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. In: 11th IEEE international symposium on object oriented real-time distributed computing (ISORC), pp 363–369Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee J, Bagheri B, Jin C (2016) Introduction to cyber manufacturing. Manuf Lett 8:12–15Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin K, Panahi M (2010) A real-time service-oriented framework to support sustainable cyber-physical systems. In: 8th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN), pp 15–21Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Münchrath J (2016) Falsche Versprechen. Handelsblatt 70(110):44–45Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    NASA (2012) Cyber-physical systems modeling and analysis (CPSMA) initiative. http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/cct/office/studies/cyber-physical_systems.html. Accessed 24 June 2016
  23. 23.
    Song H, Rawat D, Jeschke S, Brecher C (eds) (2016) Cyber-physical systems: foundations, principles and applications. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Törngren M, Asplund F, Bensalem S, McDermid J, Passerone R, Pfeifer H, Sangiovanni-Vincentelli A, Schätz B (2016) Characterization, analysis, and recommendations for exploiting the opportunities of cyber-physical systems. In: Song H, Rawat D, Jeschke S, Brecher C (eds) Cyber-physical systems: foundations, principles and applications. Academic Press, London, pp 3–14Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    VDI (2008) Richtlinie 2206—Digitale Fabrik Grundlagen. VDI-Verlag, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    VDI/VDE-Gesellschaft (2013) Cyber-Physical Systems: Chancen und Nutzen aus Sicht der Automation, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vogel-Heuser B, Kegel G, Bender K, Wucherer K (2009) Global information architecture for industrial automation. Automatisierungstechnische Praxis (atp) 51(1):108–115Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Whitmore A, Agarwal A, Da Xu L (2015) The internet of things—a survey of topics and trends. Inf Syst Front 17(2):261–274. doi: 10.1007/s10796-014-9489-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabina Jeschke
    • 1
  • Christian Brecher
    • 2
  • Tobias Meisen
    • 1
  • Denis Özdemir
    • 2
    Email author
  • Tim Eschert
    • 2
  1. 1.IMA/ZLW & IfURWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering (WZL)RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations