Values in Danish Early Childhood Education and Care

Part of the International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development book series (CHILD, volume 15)


Based on video observations, interviews and joint pedagogue/researcher analyses carried out in three Danish child cares, this chapter presents three common values: democracy, care and discipline, which were communicated, expressed and negotiated through interactions between pedagogues (In this paper, we use the term ‘pedagogues’ for professionals working in child cares.) and children. The study is part of a larger Nordic project (The research project, Values Education in Nordic Preschools: Basis of education for tomorrow, and Project No. 53381 were carried out together with Nordic research colleagues.) that aims to generate new knowledge on institutionalised fostering of values in Nordic child cares.

Democratic values deal with children’s autonomy and possibilities of participation. Caring values are linked to a special relationship that targets and supports the child’s needs. Disciplinary values are defined as the system of underlying rules, norms and existing order, which regulate children. The three values are presented one after another, but it is also shown how they overlap one another and are expressed simultaneously in everyday practice. In the end of the chapter, we sketch some pedagogical implications for values education.


Values in child care Education Democracy Care Discipline 


  1. Bae, B. (2009). Children’s right to participate – Challenges in everyday interactions. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 17(3), 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biesta, G. J. J. (1997). Education, not initiation. In F. Margonis (Ed.), Philosophy of education 1996 (pp. 90–98). Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.Google Scholar
  3. Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). God uddannelse i målingens tidsalder: Etik, politik, demokrati. Aarhus: Klim.Google Scholar
  4. Broström, S. (2006). Care and education: Towards a new paradigm in early childhood education. Child & Youth Care Forum, 35(5–6), 391–409.,%20p.%20391-409.pdf
  5. Dahlberg, G., & Moss, P. (2005). Ethics and politics in early childhood education. New York: Routledge/FalmerGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewey, J. (2005). Demokrati og uddannelse [Democracy and education]. Århus: Klim.Google Scholar
  7. Diderichsen, S. T. A. (2005). Omsorg og udvikling [Care and development]. Copenhagen: Danmarks Pædagiske Universitets Forlag.Google Scholar
  8. Durkheim, E. (1973). Moral education: A study in the theory and application of the sociology of education. New York: The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  9. Ehn, B. (1983). Ska vi leka tiger? [Shall we play tiger?]. Lund: Liber förlag.Google Scholar
  10. Einarsdottir, J., Purola, A-M., Johansson, E. M., Broström, S., & Emilson, A. (2014). Democracy, caring and competence: Values perspectives in ECEC curricula in the Nordic countries. International Journal of Early Years Education. Published online: 04 Nov 2014.
  11. Emilson, A. (2008). Det önskvärda barnet, Fostran uttryckt i vardagliga kommunikationshandlingar mellan lärare och barn i förskolan [The desirable child in preschool. Fostering expressed in everyday interactions between teachers and children in preschool]. Göteborg: ACTA Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  12. Emilson, A., & Johansson, E. (2009a). Communicated values in teacher and toddler interactions in preschool. In D. Berthelsen, J. Brownlee, & E. Johansson (Eds.), Participatory learning and the early years. Research and pedagogy (pp. 61–77). New York/London: Routledge, Taylor & Frances Group.Google Scholar
  13. Emilson, A., & Johansson, E. (2009b). The desirable toddler in preschool: Values communicated in teacher and child interactions. In E. Johansson & J. Brownlee (Eds.), Participatory learning in early years: Research and pedagogy (pp. 61–77). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Gannerud, E. (1999). Genusperspektiv på lärargärning: om kvinnliga klasslärares liv och arbete [Gender perspectives on teaching: Female teachers’ life and work]. (Göteborg studies in educational sciences, 137). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. (1987). Theory of communicative action volume two: Liveworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason (Book) (Thomas A. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston.: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Halstead, J. M., & Taylor, M. J. (2000). Research review. Learning and teaching about values: A review of recent research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 170–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen, O. H. (2013). Voices in the community. Copenhagen: Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  18. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2006). Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire. London [u.a.]: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Henckel, B. (1990). Förskollärare i tanke och handling: en studie kring begreppen arbete, lek och inlärning [Pre-school teachers in thought and actions]. Umeå: Umeå universitet, Pedagogiska institutionen.Google Scholar
  20. Herbart, J. F. (1841). Umriss pädagogischer Vorlesungen, 2. oplag Göttingen 1841.Google Scholar
  21. Honneth, A. (2006). Kamp om anerkendelse. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  22. Kant, I. (2009). An answer to the question: “What is enlightenment?”. London/New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  23. Klafki, W. (1996). Core problems of the modern world and the tasks of education. A vision of international education. Education, 53, 7–18.Google Scholar
  24. Klafki, W. (1998). Characteristics of critical-constructive Didaktik. In B. B. Gundem, & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum. An international dialogue. New York: American University Studies, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  25. Künzli, R. (2000). German Didaktik: Models of re-presentation, of intercourse and of experience. In Teaching as a reflexive practice, edited by Stefan Hopmann, Kurt Riquarts, and Ian Westbury, Kindle edition., 2000.Google Scholar
  26. Levinas, E. (1989). Ethics as first philosophy. In S. Hand (Ed.), The Levinas reader. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  27. Locke, J. (1689). Two treatises of government. London.Google Scholar
  28. Løgstrup, K. E. (1972). Norm og Spontaneitet [Norm and spontaneity]. Købehavn: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  29. Løgstrup, K. E. (1997). The ethical demand (F. Hans, Ed.). Paris: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Makarenko, A. S. (1969). Werke. Band 4. Berlin: Volk und Wissen.Google Scholar
  31. Noddings, N. (1986). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Nordin-Hultman, E. (2004). Pedagogiska miljöer och barns subjektsskapande [Educational contexts and children’s identities and subjectivity]. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  33. Peters, R. S. (1965). Education as initiation. In R. D. Archambault (Ed.), Philosophical analysis and education (pp. 87–111). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  34. Peters, R. S. (1966). Ethics and education. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  35. Polanyi, M. (1976). The Tacit Dimension.Google Scholar
  36. Sheridan, S., Samuelsson, I. P., & Johansson, E. (2009). Barns Tidiga Lärande [The child’s early education]. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
  37. Thyssen, S. (1995). Caring and toddlers development in day care. Aarhus: SystimeGoogle Scholar
  38. Tomasello, M., Dweck, C., Silk, J., Skyrms, B., & Spelke, E. (2009). Why we coorperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Danish School of EducationUniversity of AarhusAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations